To achieve the ultimate resolution and process control from an optical (193i 1.35NA) scanner system, it is desirable to be able to exploit both source and mask degrees of freedom to create the imaging conditions for any given set of patterns that comprise a photomask. For the source it has been possible to create an illumination system that allows for almost no restrictions in the location and intensity of source points in the illumination plane . For the mask, it has been harder to approach the ideal continuous phase and transmission mask that theoretically would have the best imaging performance. Mask blanks and processing requirements have limited us to binary (1 and 0 amplitude, or 1 and -0.25 amplitude (6% attenuated PSM)) or Alternating PSM (1, 0 and -1 amplitude) solutions. Furthermore, mask writing (and OPC algorithms) have limited us to Manhattan layouts for full chip logic solutions. Recent developments in the areas of mask design and newly developed Multi-Beam Mask Writers (MBMW) have removed the mask limitation to Manhattan geometries . In this paper we consider some of the manufacturing challenges for these curvilinear masks.
Chris Spence, Quan Zhang, Vincent Shu, Been-Der Chen, Stanislas Baron, Yasuko Saito, Masakazu Hamaji, Yasuaki Horima, and Shuichiro Ohara, "Manufacturing challenges for curvilinear masks," Proc. SPIE 10451, Photomask Technology, 1045104 (Presented at SPIE Photomask Technology and EUV Lithography: September 11, 2017; Published: 16 October 2017); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2280470.
Conference Presentations are recordings of oral presentations given at SPIE conferences and published as part of the conference proceedings. They include the speaker's narration along with a video recording of the presentation slides and animations. Many conference presentations also include full-text papers. Search and browse our growing collection of more than 14,000 conference presentations, including many plenary and keynote presentations.