Image quality of the computer-generated holograms are usually evaluated subjectively. For example, the reconstructed image from the hologram is compared with other holograms, or evaluated by the double-stimulus impairment scale method to compare with the original image. In previous research, we proposed image quality evaluation by peak signal-to-noise ratio and diffraction efficiency. Theory and numerical experimental results are shown on Fourier transform transmission hologram of both amplitude and phase modulation. In this paper, we compare objective evaluation method and subjective evaluation and verify validity. Subjective evaluation is performed by optical and numerical reconstructions, and objective evaluation is performed by the structural similarity index and diffraction efficiency.
Hiroshi Yoshikawa, Takeshi Yamaguchi, and Hiroki Uetake, "Validation of objective image quality evaluation for computer-generated hologram," Proc. SPIE 10558, Practical Holography XXXII: Displays, Materials, and Applications, 105580F (Presented at SPIE OPTO: January 30, 2018; Published: 19 February 2018); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2287619.
Conference Presentations are recordings of oral presentations given at SPIE conferences and published as part of the proceedings. They include the speaker's narration with video of the slides and animations. Most include full-text papers. Interactive, searchable transcripts and closed captioning are now available for 2018 presentations, with transcripts for prior recordings added daily.
Search our growing collection of more than 16,000 conference presentations, including many plenaries and keynotes.