PROCEEDINGS VOLUME 4686
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002 | 23-28 FEBRUARY 2002
Medical Imaging 2002: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002
23-28 February 2002
San Diego, California, United States
Observer Models
Proc. SPIE 4686, Estimation of three-class ideal observer decision functions with a Bayesian artificial neural network, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462662
Proc. SPIE 4686, Effect of image compression for model and human observers in signal-known-statistically tasks, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462673
Proc. SPIE 4686, Human-observer templates for detection of a simulated lesion in mammographic images, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462683
Proc. SPIE 4686, Matching statistical object models to real images, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462690
Proc. SPIE 4686, Effect of Toto circle and mammographic background size on detection performance, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462698
Keynote/Observer Performance Studies I
Proc. SPIE 4686, Identification of superior discriminations during ROC studies, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462699
Proc. SPIE 4686, Identification of superior discriminators during non-ROC studies, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462700
Proc. SPIE 4686, Using BIRADS categories in ROC experiments, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462701
Perceptual Factors in Image Interpretation
Proc. SPIE 4686, Interobserver variations on interpretation of multislice CT lung cancer screening studies, and the implications for computer-aided diagnosis, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462663
Proc. SPIE 4686, Relating image-based features to mammogram interpretation, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462664
Proc. SPIE 4686, Detecting abnormalities in noncued areas of digitized mammograms: an observer experience, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462665
Proc. SPIE 4686, Evaluating a CCD film digitizer: comparing interpretation accuracy with original film readings, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462666
Proc. SPIE 4686, Relationship of image quality to decision accuracy for ARVD in MRI, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462667
Observer Performance Studies II
Proc. SPIE 4686, Observer performance and radiographic technique factors in digital mammography, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462668
Proc. SPIE 4686, Discrepancies between film and digital mammography interpretations, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462669
Proc. SPIE 4686, Comparison of analog and digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy image sequences, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462670
Proc. SPIE 4686, Evaluation of displays for medical x-ray applications using observer performance, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462671
Proc. SPIE 4686, Performance visualization for image compression in telepathology, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462672
ROC Studies/CRT Psychophysics
Proc. SPIE 4686, Reader strategies: variability and error- methodology, findings, and health policy implications from a study of the U.S. population of mammographers, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462674
Proc. SPIE 4686, Reconsidering bit depth for medial images: Is eight enough?, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462675
Proc. SPIE 4686, Human visual system intrascene luminance dynamic range, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462676
Proc. SPIE 4686, Interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462677
ROC Methodology
Proc. SPIE 4686, Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462678
Proc. SPIE 4686, Comparison of student's t-test and the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM) method for the statistical comparison of competing diagnostic modalities, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462679
Proc. SPIE 4686, Comparison of free-response and ROC analyses in modality comparison studies involving lesion localization, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462680
Proc. SPIE 4686, Development of a test object for an objective assessment of image quality in conventional or digital mammography, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462681
Proc. SPIE 4686, New StatPhantom software for assessment of digital image quality, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462682
Vision Models
Proc. SPIE 4686, Visual discrimination modeling of lesion detectability, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462684
Proc. SPIE 4686, Perceptually optimized compression of mammograms, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462685
Proc. SPIE 4686, Observer performance evaluation of a method of simulating abnormalities in mammograms, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462686
Poster Session
Proc. SPIE 4686, System-oriented optimization of CAD for mass detection in digital mammography, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462687
Proc. SPIE 4686, Visual evoked potential study of attention, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462688
Proc. SPIE 4686, Quantifying the effect of colorization enhancement on mammogram images, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462689
Proc. SPIE 4686, Lesion conspicuity and AFROC performance in pulmonary nodule detection, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462691
Proc. SPIE 4686, Screen film versus digital mammography: a perceptual analysis of postprocessed hard copy images, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462692
Proc. SPIE 4686, Clinical effectiveness of improved temporal subtraction for digital chest radiographs, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462693
Proc. SPIE 4686, Optimizing soft copy mammography displays using a human visual system model: influence of display phosphor, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462694
Proc. SPIE 4686, What is worse: decreased spatial resolution or increased noise?, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462695
Proc. SPIE 4686, Verification of clinical test objects for diagnostic quality-guaranteed CRT monitor based on the visual evaluation, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462696
ROC Methodology
Proc. SPIE 4686, Two-stage ROC curve regression model when sampling a population of diagnosticians, 0000 (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462697
Back to Top