PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
This PDF file contains the front matter associated with SPIE Proceedings Volume 6917, including the Title Page, Copyright information, Table of Contents, Introduction (if any), and the Conference Committee listing.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
In a previously reported study we demonstrated that expert performance can decline following perceptual feedback of
eye movements in the relatively simple radiological task of wrist fracture detection. This study was carried out to
determine if the same effect could be observed using a more complicated radiological task of identifying lung nodules on
chest radiographs. Four groups (n=10 in each group) of observers with different levels of expertise were tested. The
groups were naïve observers, level 1 radiography students, level 2 radiography students and experts. Feedback was
presented to the observers in the form of their scan paths and fixations. Half the observers had feedback and half had no
perceptual feedback. JAFROC analysis was used to measure observer performance. A repeated measures ANOVA was
carried out. There was no significant effect between the pre and post "no feedback" condition. There was a significant
difference between the pre and post "feedback" condition with a significant improvement following feedback
(F(1,16)=6.6,p = 0.021). Overall the mean percentage improvement was small of 3.3%, with most of the improvement
due to the level 1 group where the percentage increase in the figure of merit (FOM) was 8.4% and this was significant
(p<0.05).
Eye tracking metrics indicate that the expert and naïve observers were less affected by feedback or a second look
whereas there were mixed results between the level 1 and level 2 students possibly reflecting the different search
strategies used. Perceptual feedback may be beneficial for those early in their training.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Previously we have shown that the eyes of expert breast imagers are attracted to the location
of a malignant mass in a mammogram in less than 2 seconds after image onset. Moreover, the longer
they take to visually fixate the location of the mass, the less likely it is that they will report it. We
conjectured that this behavior was due to the formation of the initial hypothesis about the image (i.e.,
'normal' - no lesions to report, or 'abnormal' - possible lesions to report). This initial hypothesis is
formed as a result of a difference template between the experts' expectations of the image and the
actual image. Hence, when the image is displayed, the expert detects the areas that do not correspond
to their 'a priori expectation', and these areas get assigned weights according to the magnitude of the
perturbation. The radiologist then uses eye movements to guide the high resolution fovea to each of
these locations, in order to resolve each perturbation. To accomplish this task successfully the
radiologist uses not only the local features in the area but also lateral comparisons with selected
background locations, and this comprises the radiologist's visual search strategy. Eye-position
tracking studies seem to suggest that no two radiologists search the breast parenchyma alike, which
makes one wonder whether successful search models can be developed. In this study we show that
there is more to the experts' search strategy than meets the eye.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Comprehensive quantitative evaluation of tumor segmentation technique on large scale clinical data sets is crucial
for routine clinical use of CT based tumor volumetry for cancer diagnosis and treatment response evaluation.
In this paper, we present a systematic validation study of a semi-automatic image segmentation technique for
measuring tumor volume from CT images. The segmentation algorithm was tested using clinical data of 200
tumors in 107 patients with liver, lung, lymphoma and other types of cancer. The performance was evaluated
using both accuracy and reproducibility. The accuracy was assessed using 7 commonly used metrics that can
provide complementary information regarding the quality of the segmentation results. The reproducibility was
measured by the variation of the volume measurements from 10 independent segmentations. The effect of
disease type, lesion size and slice thickness of image data on the accuracy measures were also analyzed. Our
results demonstrate that the tumor segmentation algorithm showed good correlation with ground truth for all
four lesion types (r = 0.97, 0.99, 0.97, 0.98, p < 0.0001 for liver, lung, lymphoma and other respectively). The
segmentation algorithm can produce relatively reproducible volume measurements on all lesion types (coefficient
of variation in the range of 10-20%). Our results show that the algorithm is insensitive to lesion size (coefficient
of determination close to 0) and slice thickness of image data(p > 0.90). The validation framework used in this
study has the potential to facilitate the development of new tumor segmentation algorithms and assist large scale
evaluation of segmentation techniques for other clinical applications.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
A real-time matching algorithm for follow-up chest CT scans can significantly reduce the workload on radiologists by
automatically finding the corresponding location in the first or second scan, respectively. The objective of this study was
to assess the accuracy of a fast and versatile single-point registration algorithm for thoracic CT scans.
The matching algorithm is based on automatic lung segmentations in both CT scans, individually for left and right lung.
Whenever the user clicks on an arbitrary structure in the lung, the coarse position of the corresponding point in the other
scan is identified by comparing the volume percentiles of the lungs. Then the position is refined by optimizing the gray
value cross-correlation of a local volume of interest. The algorithm is able to register any structure in or near the lungs,
but is of clinical interest in particular with respect to lung nodules and airways.
For validation, CT scan pairs were used in which the patients were scanned twice in one session, using low-dose non-contrast-enhanced chest CT scans (0.75 mm collimation). Between these scans, patients got off and on the table to
simulate a follow-up scan. 291 nodules were evaluated. Average nodule diameter was 9.5 mm (range 2.9 - 74.1 mm).
Automatic registration succeeded in 95.2% of all cases (277 / 291). In successful registered nodules, average registration
consistency was 1.1 mm. The real-time matching proved to be an accurate and useful tool for radiologists evaluating
follow-up chest CT scans to assess possible nodule growth.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) together are a powerful diagnostic tool, but
imperfect image quality allows false positive and false negative diagnoses to be made by any observer despite experience
and training. This work investigates PET acquisition mode, reconstruction method and a standard uptake value (SUV)
correction scheme on the classification of lesions as benign or malignant in PET/CT images, in an anthropomorphic
phantom. The scheme accounts for partial volume effect (PVE) and PET resolution. The observer draws a region of
interest (ROI) around the lesion using the CT dataset. A simulated homogenous PET lesion of the same shape as the
drawn ROI is blurred with the point spread function (PSF) of the PET scanner to estimate the PVE, providing a scaling
factor to produce a corrected SUV. Computer simulations showed that the accuracy of the corrected PET values depends
on variations in the CT-drawn boundary and the position of the lesion with respect to the PET image matrix, especially
for smaller lesions. Correction accuracy was affected slightly by mismatch of the simulation PSF and the actual scanner
PSF. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study resulted in several observations. Using observer drawn ROIs,
scaled tumor-background ratios (TBRs) more accurately represented actual TBRs than unscaled TBRs. For the PET
images, 3D OSEM outperformed 2D OSEM, 3D OSEM outperformed 3D FBP, and 2D OSEM outperformed 2D FBP.
The correction scheme significantly increased sensitivity and slightly increased accuracy for all acquisition and
reconstruction modes at the cost of a small decrease in specificity.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
We are investigating the potential for differences in study conclusions when assessing the estimated impact of a
computer-aided detection (CAD) system on readers' performance using a signal-based performance analysis derived
from Free-response Receiver Operating Characteristics (FROC) versus a case-based performance analysis derived from
Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis. To consider this question, we utilized reader data from a CAD
assessment study based on 100 mammographic background images to which fixed-size and fixed-intensity Gaussian
signals were added, generating a low- and high-intensity set. The study thus allowed CAD assessment in two situations:
when CAD sensitivity was 1) superior or 2) equivalent or lower than the average reader. Seven readers were asked to
review each set using CAD in both second-reader and concurrent modes. Signal-based detection results were analyzed
using the area under the FROC curve below 0.5 false positives per image. Case-based decision results were analyzed
using the area under the parametric ROC curve. The results were consistent between the signal-based and case-based
analyses for the low-intensity set, suggesting that CAD in both reading modes can increase reader signal-based
detection and case-based decision accuracies. For the high-intensity set, the signal-based and case-based analysis
suggested different conclusions regarding the utility of CAD, although neither analysis resulted in statistical
significance.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the performance of different image processing algorithms in terms of
representation of microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms.
Clusters were simulated in clinical raw ("for processing") images. The entire dataset of images consisted of 200 normal
mammograms, selected out of our clinical routine cases and acquired with a Siemens Novation DR system. In 100 of the
normal images a total of 142 clusters were simulated; the remaining 100 normal mammograms served as true negative
input cases. Both abnormal and normal images were processed with 5 commercially available processing algorithms:
Siemens OpView1 and Siemens OpView2, Agfa Musica1, Sectra Mamea AB Sigmoid and IMS Raffaello Mammo 1.2.
Five observers were asked to locate and score the cluster(s) in each image, by means of dedicated software tool.
Observer performance was assessed using the JAFROC Figure of Merit. FROC curves, fitted using the IDCA method,
have also been calculated.
JAFROC analysis revealed significant differences among the image processing algorithms in the detection of
microcalcifications clusters (p=0.0000369). Calculated average Figures of Merit are: 0.758 for Siemens OpView2, 0.747
for IMS Processing 1.2, 0.736 for Agfa Musica1 processing, 0.706 for Sectra Mamea AB Sigmoid processing and 0.703
for Siemens OpView1.
This study is a first step towards a quantitative assessment of image processing in terms of cluster detection in clinical
mammograms. Although we showed a significant difference among the image processing algorithms, this method does
not on its own allow for a global performance ranking of the investigated algorithms.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Appropriate validation of the segmentation algorithms is important for clinical acceptance of those methods. Receiver
operating characteristic (ROC) analysis provides the most comprehensive description of the accuracy performance of
image segmentation. Total area under an ROC curve (AUC) is widely used as an index of ROC analysis of performance
test. However, a large part of the ROC curve is in the clinically irrelevant range. The total area can be misleading in
some clinical situation. In this paper, we proposed a partial area index of ROC curves, which measures the segmentation
performance in a clinically relevant range decided by learning from subjective ratings. The boundary of the range is
defined by a linear cost function of false positive fraction (FPF) and true positive fraction (TPF). The cost factors of FPF
and TPF are learned by maximizing the Kendall's coefficient of concordance (KCC) between the partial areas and the
subjective ratings. Experiment results show that our method gives a large cost factor on FPF and a small cost factor on
TPF on a tumor data set. This is consistent with the fact that a large FPF is generally more difficult to be accepted in
tumor segmentation. Our method is able to determine the optimal range for partial area index of ROC analysis, and this
partial area index is more appropriate than AUC for evaluating segmentation performance.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
We examined the statistical powers of three methods for analyzing FROC mark-rating data, namely ROC, JAFROC and
IDCA. Two classes of observers were simulated: a designer-level CAD algorithm and a human observer. A search-model
based simulator was used with the average numbers of false positives per image ranging from 0.21 for the human
observer to 10 for CAD. Model parameters were chosen to yield 80% and 85% areas under the predicted ROC curves
for both classes of observers and inter-image and inter-modality correlations of 0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 were investigated. The
area under the FROC curve up to abscissa α (ranging from 0.18 to 6.7) was used as the IDCA figure-of-merit; the other
methods used their well-known figures of merit. For IDCA power increased with α so it should be chosen as large as
possible consistent with the need for overlap of the two FROC curves in the x-direction. For CAD the IDCA method
yielded the highest statistical power. Surprisingly, JAFROC yielded the highest statistical power for human observers,
even greater than IDCA which, unlike JAFROC, uses all the marks. The largest difference occurred for conservative
reporting styles and high data correlation: e.g., 0.3453 for JAFROC vs. 0.2672 for IDCA. One reason is that unlike
IDCA, the JAFROC figure of merit is sensitive to unmarked normal images and unmarked lesions. In all cases the ROC
method yielded the least statistical power and entailed a substantial statistical power penalty (e.g., 24% for ROC vs. 41%
for JAFROC). For human observers JAFROC should be used and for designer-level CAD data IDCA should be used and
use of the ROC method for localization studies is discouraged.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Agreement is estimated by comparing correlated/paired scores (e.g. the scores from two doctors reading the same set
of images), such as the correlation coefficient and measures of concordance. Some variance estimation techniques for
these measures are also available in the literature. In this work, we compared four agreement measures: the widely used
Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient, Kendall's tau, and two measures that are generalizations of AUC, the
area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The generalization allows for ordinal truth that is
polytomous (multi-state) or even continuous instead of just binary, and thus AUC is a special case.
We investigate how these measures behave in a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) simulation experiment as we change
the intrinsic correlation and number of rating levels. We also investigate a few variance estimation techniques for these
measures that are available in the literature. These agreement measures will help investigators developing model
observers to compare their models against a human on a case-by-case basis instead of with a summary figure of merit
that requires and is limited by binary truth, like AUC. The model observer AUC can equal the human observer AUC,
while making very different decisions on a case-by-case basis.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Previously we have developed a decision model for three-class ROC analysis where classification
is made three simultaneously, i.e., with a single decision. In this paper, an alternative sequential decision model was
developed for the specific three-class diagnostic procedure of rest-stress myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS)
imaging. This sequential decision model was developed based on the fact that sometimes this diagnostic task is
performed using a two-step process. First, the stress (99m
Tc) image is read to determine whether a patient is normal
or abnormal based on the presence of a defect in the stress image. If a defect is found, the rest (201Tl) image is then
read to determine whether this is a reversible defect or a fixed defect based on the presence of defect on the rest
image. In fact, in some MPS protocols where sequential stress/rest imaging is performed, the rest imaging is not
performed if there is no defect in the stress image. Therefore, the three-class task is decomposed to a sequence of
two two-class tasks. For this task we determined, by maximizing the expected utility of both steps of the decision
process, that log likelihood ratios were the optimal decision variables and provide the optimal ROC surface under
the assumption that incorrect decisions have equal utilities under the same hypothesis. The properties of the
sequential decision model were then studied. We found that the sequential decision model shares most of the
features of a 2-class ROC curve. While this model was developed in the context of rest-stress MPS, it may have
applications to other two-step diagnostic tasks.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
We previously introduced a utility-based ROC performance metric, the "surface-averaged expected cost" (SAEC),
to address difficulties which arise in generalizing the well-known area under the ROC curve (AUC) to classification
tasks with more than two classes. In a two-class classification task, the SAEC can be shown explicitly to be
twice the area above the conventional ROC curve (1-AUC) divided by the arclength along the ROC curve. In
the present work, we show that for a variety of two-class tasks under the binormal model, the SAEC obtained
for the proper decision variable (the likelihood ratio of the latent decision variable) is less than that obtained for
the conventional decision variable (i.e., using the latent decision variable directly). We also justify this result
using a readily derived property of the arclength along the ROC curve under a given data model. Numerical
studies as well as theoretical analysis suggest that the behavior of the SAEC is consistent with that of the AUC
performance metric, in the sense that the optimal value of this quantity is achieved by the ideal observer.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Computer-based tools are increasingly used for training and the continuing professional development of radiologists. We
propose an adaptive training system to support individualised learning in mammography, based on a set of real cases,
which are annotated with educational content by experienced breast radiologists. The system has knowledge of the
strengths and weakness of each radiologist's performance: each radiologist is assessed to compute a profile showing how
they perform on different sets of cases, classified by type of abnormality, breast density, and perceptual difficulty. We
also assess variability in cognitive aspects of image perception, classifying errors made by radiologists as errors of
search, recognition or decision. This is a novel element in our approach. The profile is used to select cases to present to
the radiologist. The intelligent and flexible presentation of these cases distinguishes our system from existing training
tools. The training cases are organised and indexed by an ontology we have developed for breast radiologist training,
which is consistent with the radiologists' profile. Hence, the training system is able to select appropriate cases to
compose an individualised training path, addressing the variability of the radiologists' performance. A substantial part of
the system, the ontology has been evaluated on a large number of cases, and the training system is under implementation
for further evaluation.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
In this study, image quality was based on required clinical criteria, in order to investigate to what degree entrance dose
could be lowered and what kind of added filtration can be used without impinging on radiologist confidence levels in
diagnosing.
Images were taken of extremities from a cadaver using stepwise decreasing dose levels and variation of added filtration
(no filtration, aluminum, aluminum/copper) under digital projection radiography (Kodak DirectView DR7500). The
starting point dose level for all body parts imaged was the current x-ray technique. Two experienced and two resident
radiologists were presented the images in a blinded fashion and rated each with an image quality score from 1 to 9
indicated very satisfied and 1 as very unsatisfied indicating loss of diagnostic value. The readers were not aware of
which dose level and added filtration corresponded to which image. Dose levels considered were 100%, 75%, 50% and
25% of the normal and customary x-ray techniques used for the particular body part and projection. Images were
reviewed on a clinical diagnostic workstation with no time limits imposed. Readers were also able to change the image
presentation by adjusting the window width and level.
Without added filtration image quality mean score was rated with 6.3 (dose level 100%), 6.2 (dose level 75%), 5.3
(dose level 50%) and with 4.4 (dose level 25%). An added aluminum filtration induced an image quality mean score of
6.3 (dose level 100%), 6.0 (dose level 75%), 5.1 (dose level 50%) and of 4.2 (dose level 25%). Using aluminum/copper
filtration image quality mean score was rated with 6.0 (dose level 100%), 6.1 (dose level 75%), 5.0 (dose level 50%)
and with 3.8 (dose level 25%). Regardless of the added filtration a differentiation between dose levels 100% and 75%
was possible in 38.9%, between dose levels 75% and 50% in 66.7%, and between dose levels 50% and 25% in 70.0%
of the cases.
It is possible, in the case of extremities, to lower entrance doses up to 75 % of the normal value, a reduction of 25% in
dose, under simultaneous use of added aluminum or aluminum/copper filtration, without comprising the diagnostic
value required.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Development of a fully automated system retrieving visually similar images is a task that could be
helpful as the basis of a computer-assisted diagnostic (CADx) tool in mammography. Our study aims at
a better understanding of the concept of visual similarity as it pertains to mammographic masses. Such
understanding is a necessary step for building effective perceptually-driven image retrieval systems. In
our study we deconstruct the concept of visual mass similarity into three components: similarity of
size, similarity of shape, and similarity of margin. We present the results of a pilot observer study
to determine the importance of each component when human observers assess the overall similarity
of two masses. Seven observers of various expertise participated in the study: 1 highly experienced
mammographer, 1 expert in visual perception, 3 CAD researchers, and 2 novices. Each observer
assessed the similarity between 100 pairs of mammographic regions of interest (ROIs) depicting benign
and malignant masses. Visual similarity was assessed in four categories (shape, size, margin, overall)
using a web-based interface and a 10-point rating scale. Preliminary analysis of the results suggests
the following. First, there is a moderate agreement between observers in similarity assessment for all
mentioned categories. Second, all components substantially affect the overall similarity rating, with
mass margin having the highest significance and mass size having the lowest significance relatively to
the other factors. These findings varied somewhat based on the observer's expertise. Third, some
low-level morphological features extracted from the masses can be used to mimic the overall visual
similarity ratings and its specific components.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Texture is known to predict atypicality in pigmented skin lesions. This paper describes an experiment that was
conducted to determine 1) if this textural information is present in the center of skin lesions, and 2) how color
affects the perception of this information. Images of pigmented skin lesions from three categories were shown
to subjects in such a way that only textural information could be perceived; other factors known to predict
atypicality were removed or held constant. These images were shown in both color and grayscale. Each subject
assigned a score of atypicality to each image.
The experiment was conducted on 5 subjects of varying backgrounds, including one expert. Each subject's
accuracy under each modality was measured by calculating the volume under a 3-way ROC surface. The
modalities were compared using the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM) method of ROC analysis, giving a p-value
of 0.8611. Therefore the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the predictive power of the modalities
cannot be rejected. Also, a two one-sided test of equivalence (TOST) was performed giving a p-value pair of
< 0.01; strong evidence that the textural information is independent of color.
Additionally, the subjects' accuracies were compared to a set of random readers using the DBM and TOST
methods. This was done for accuracies under the color modality, the grayscale modality and both modalities
simultaneously. The results (all p-values < 0.001) confirm the existence of textural information predictive of
atypia in the center of pigmented skin lesions.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
We studied the influence of signal variability on human and model observer performances for a detection task with
mammographic backgrounds and computer generated clustered lumpy backgrounds (CLB). We used synthetic yet
realistic masses and backgrounds that have been validated by radiologists during previous studies, ensuring conditions
close to the clinical situation. Four trained non-physician observers participated in two-alternative forced-choice (2-AFC)
experiments. They were asked to detect synthetic masses superimposed on real mammographic backgrounds or CLB.
Separate experiments were conducted with sets of benign and malignant masses. Results under the signal-known-exactly
(SKE) paradigm were compared with signal-known-statistically (SKS) experiments. In the latter case, the signal was
chosen randomly for each of the 1,400 2-AFC trials (image pairs) among a set of 50 masses with similar dimensions, and
the observers did not know which signal was present. Human observers' results were then compared with model
observers (channelized Hotelling with Difference-of-Gaussian and Gabor channels) in the same experimental conditions.
Results show that the performance of the human observers does not differ significantly when benign masses are
superimposed on real images or on CLB with locally matched gray level mean and standard deviation. For both benign
and malignant masses, the performance does not differ significantly between SKE and SKS experiments, when the
signals' dimensions do not vary throughout the experiment. However, there is a performance drop when the SKS signals'
dimensions vary from 5.5 to 9.5 mm in the same experiment. Noise level in the model observers can be adjusted to
reproduce human observers' proportion of correct answers in the 2-AFC task within 5% accuracy for most conditions.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
The perceptual difference model (Case-PDM) is being used to quantify image quality of fast, parallel MR acquisitions
and reconstruction algorithms by comparing to slower, full k-space, high quality reference images. To date, most
perceptual difference models average a single scalar image quality metric over a large region of interest. In this paper,
we create an alternative metric weighted to image processing features. Spatial filters were applied to the reference image
to create edge and flat region images, then weighted and aggregated to create "structural" images which in turn spatially
weighted the perceptual difference maps. We optimized the scale of the spatial filters and weighting scheme with an
exhaustive search so as to improve the linear correlation coefficient between human ratings and weighted Case-PDM,
across a large set of MR reconstruction test images of varying quality. Human ratings were obtained from a modified
Double Stimulus Continuous Quality Scale experiment. For 5 different images (3 different brain, 1 cardiac, and 1
phantom images), r values [weighted PDM, average PDM] were improved ([0.96, 0.94], [0.93, 0.91], [0.97, 0.95], [0.97,
0.91], [0.96, 0.95]) in all cases. The method is robust across subjects and anatomy; that is, scores maintain a high
correlation with human ratings even if the test dataset is different from the training dataset.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Liquid crystal displays (LCD) are replacing analog film in radiology and permit to reduce diagnosis times. Their
typical dynamic range, however, can be too low for some applications, and their poor ability to reproduce low
luminance areas represents a critical drawback. The black level of an LCD can be drastically improved by
stacking two liquid crystal panels in series. In this way the global transmittance is the pointwise product of the
transmittances of the two panels and the theoretical dynamic range is squared. Such a high dynamic range (HDR)
display also permits the reproduction of a larger number of gray levels, increasing the bit depth of the device.
The two panels, however, are placed at a small distance one from each other due to mechanical constraints, and
this introduces a parallax error when the display is observed off-axis. A complex, spatially-adaptive algorithm
is therefore necessary to generate the images used to drive the two panels.
In this paper, we describe the characteristics of a prototype dual-layer HDR display and discuss the issues
involved in the image splitting algorithms. We propose some solutions and analyze their performance, giving a
measure of the capabilities and limitations of the device.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
The DICOM part 14 grayscale standard display function provides one way of harmonizing image appearance under different monitor luminance settings. This function is based on ideal observer conditions where the eye is always adapted to the target luminance and thereby also at peak contrast sensitivity. Clinical workstations are however often
exposed to variations in ambient light due to a sub-optimal reading room light environment. Also, clinical images are inhomogeneous and low-contrast patterns must be detected even at luminance levels that differ from the eye adaptation level. All deviations from ideal luminance conditions cause the observer to detect patterns with reduced eye sensitivity but the magnitude of this reduction is unclear. The purpose of this paper was to quantify the effect different luminance settings have on the contrast threshold. A method to display well-defined sinusoidal low-contrast test patterns on an
LCD has previously been developed and was used in this study. The observers were exposed to light from three
different areas: 1) A small sinusoidal test pattern. 2) The remaining of the display surface. 3) Ambient light from outside
the display area covering most of the observer's field of view. By adjusting the luminance from each of these three
areas, two major effects could be quantified. The first effect was similar to Barten's f-factor where the target luminance
differs from the observer's adaptation level while the second effect concerned the influence of areas outside the display
surface. When a luminance range of 1-350 cd/m2 was used, the contrast needed to detect a dark object in a gray
surrounding was almost doubled compared to a dark object in a dark surrounding. Ambient light from outside the
display area has a moderate effect on the contrast threshold, except for the combination of high ambient light and dark
objects where the contrast threshold increased considerably.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Purpose
Detection of low-contrast details is highly dependent on the adaptation state of the eye. It is important therefore that the
average luminance of the observer's field of view (FOV) matches those of softcopy radiological images. This study
establishes the percentage of FOV filled by workstations at various viewing distances.
Methods
Five observers stood at viewing distances of 20, 30 and 50cm from a homogenous white surface and were instructed to
continuously focus on a fixed object at a height appropriate level. A dark indicator was held at this object and then
moved steadily until the observer could no longer perceive it in his/her peripheral vision. This was performed at 0°, 90°,
180° and 270° clockwise from the median sagittal plane. Distances were recorded, radii calculated and observer and
mean FOV areas established. These values were then compared with areas of typical high and low specification
workstations.
Results
Individual and mean FOVs were 7660, 15463 and 30075cm2 at viewing distances of 20, 30 and 50cm respectively. High
and low specification monitors with respective areas of 1576.25 and 921.25cm2 contributed between 5 to 21% and 3 to
12% respectively to the total FOV depending on observer distance. Limited inter-observer variances were noted.
Conclusions
Radiology workstations typically comprise between only 3 and 21% of the observer's FOV. This demonstrates the
importance of measuring ambient light levels and surface reflection coefficients in order to maximise adaptation and
observer's perception of low contrast detail and minimise eye strain.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Color displays are increasingly used for medical imaging, replacing the traditional monochrome displays in radiology
for multi-modality applications, 3D representation applications, etc. Color displays are also used increasingly because of
wide spread application of Tele-Medicine, Tele-Dermatology and Digital Pathology. At this time, there is no concerted
effort for calibration procedures for this diverse range of color displays in Telemedicine and in other areas of the
medical field. Using a colorimeter to measure the display luminance and chrominance properties as well as some
processing software we developed a first attempt to a color calibration protocol for the medical imaging field.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Most assessments of display performance are limited to studying the display quality for static images. However,
dynamic scenes constitute a large fraction of medical images and are becoming more widespread due to the
increase in the number of images to be interpreted. The image quality of a dynamic scene is affected by
the display's temporal characteristics and the human visual system's temporal response. We propose to use a
computational observer to understand the effect of image browsing speed in medical displays. We use a 3D cluster
lumpy background to study the effect of different browsing speeds using liquid crystal display (LCD) temporal
response measurements reported in our previous work. The image set is then analyzed by the computational
observer. This allows us to quantify the effect of slow temporal response of medical LCDs on the performance of
the anthropomorphic observer. Slow temporal response of the display device affects the lesion contrast and the
observer performance. Human visual system also adds to the complexity of image perception of dynamic scenes.
A human observer study was used to validate the computational observer results.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
We investigate the use of linear model observers to predict human performance in a localization ROC (LROC)
study. The task is to locate gallium-avid tumors in simulated SPECT images of a digital phantom. Our study is
intended to find the optimal strength of smoothing priors incorporating various degrees of anatomical knowledge.
Although humans reading the images must perform a search task, our models ignore search by assuming the lesion
location is known. We use area under the model ROC curve to predict human area under the LROC curve. We
used three models, the non-prewhitening matched filter (NPWMF), the channelized nonprewhitening (CNPW),
and the channelized Hotelling observer (CHO). All models have access to noise-free reconstructions, which are
used to compute the signal template. The NPWMF model does a poor job of predicting human performance.
The CNPW and CHO model do a somewhat better job, but still do not qualitatively capture the human results.
None of the models accurately predicts the smoothing strength which maximizes human performance.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
In breast tomosynthesis (BT), multiple x-ray projections obtained over a limited angular span are reconstructed
to produce a three-dimensional (3D) volume. This 3D imagery can lead to reduced structural masking effects
compared to conventional mammography. Accordingly, there has been considerable interest in optimizing acquisition
and reconstruction parameters associated with BT. In this work, we evaluate the use of a scanning
model observer and localization ROC (LROC) methodology for performing a task-based optimization of the
angular span and number of projection angles for a simulated BT system. The observer was applied to extracted
slices of 3D volumes reconstructed with filtered backprojection. Both "background-known-exactly" (BKE) and
"quasi-BKE" (QBKE) tasks were conducted. The latter task attempts to account for limited observer training
by preserving structural noise in the detection task. Reduced noise in the form of fewer projections was important
with the BKE task, although wider angular spans were also advantageous. Higher sampling densities may
improve performance for the more-realistic QBKE tasks.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
The Bayesian ideal observer is optimal among all observers and sets an upper bound for observer performance in
binary detection tasks. This observer provides a quantitative measure of diagnostic performance of an imaging
system, summarized by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and thus should
be used for image quality assessment whenever possible. However, computation of ideal-observer performance
is difficult because this observer requires the full description of the statistical properties of the signal-absent
and signal-present data, which are often unknown in tasks involving complex backgrounds. Furthermore, the
dimension of the integrals that need to be calculated for the observer is huge. To estimate ideal-observer
performance in detection tasks with non-Gaussian lumpy backgrounds, Kupinski et al. developed a Markovchain
Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, but this method has a disadvantage of long computation times. In
an attempt to reduce the computation load and still approximate ideal-observer performance, Park et al.
investigated a channelized-ideal observer (CIO) in similar tasks and found that the CIO with singular vectors of
the imaging system approximated the performance of the ideal observer. But, in that work, an extension of the
Kupinski MCMC was used for calculating the performance of the CIO and it did not reduce the computational
burden. In the current work, we propose a new MCMC method, which we call a CIO-MCMC, to speed up
the computation of the CIO. We use singular vectors of the imaging system as efficient channels for the ideal
observer. Our results show that the CIO-MCMC has the potential to speed up the computation of ideal observer
performance with a large number of channels.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
The Bayesian ideal observer sets an upper bound for diagnostic performance of an imaging system in binary
detection tasks. Thus, this observer should be used for image quality assessment whenever possible. However, it
is difficult to compute ideal-observer performance because the probability density functions of the data, required
for the observer, are often unknown in tasks involving complex backgrounds. Furthermore, the dimension of
the integrals that need to be calculated for the observer is huge. To attempt to reduce the dimensionality
of the problem, and yet still approximate ideal-observer performance, a channelized-ideal observer (CIO) with
Laguerre-Gauss channels was previously investigated for detecting a Gaussian signal at a known location in
non-Gaussian lumpy images. While the CIO with Laguerre-Gauss channels had, in some cases, approximated
ideal-observer performance, there was still a gap between the mean performance of the ideal observer and the
CIO. Moreover, it is not clear how to choose efficient channels for the ideal observer. In the current work, we
investigate the use of singular vectors of a linear imaging system as efficient channels for the ideal observer in
the same tasks. Singular value decomposition of the imaging system is performed to obtain its singular vectors.
Singular vectors most relevant to the signal and background images are chosen as candidate channels. Results
indicate that the singular vectors are not only more efficient than Laguerre-Gauss channels, but are also highly
efficient for the ideal observer. The results further demonstrate that singular vectors strongly associated with
the signal-only image are the most efficient channels.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
We use a task-based study to objectively evaluate the effect of variable versus fixed focal length in determining
the position of a lesion in helical cone-beam computed tomography (HCBCT). This method will be used
to assess whether variable focal length CBCT scans provide a measurable improvement in estimating lesion
position relative to fixed focal length CBCT in diagnostic applications. In this simulation study a 1 cm diameter
spherical lesion is placed at four different positions within a three-dimensional Shepp-Logan head phantom. The
axial plane is taken to point along the z-axis, which is also the central axis of the helix. The lesion is placed at
the center of the Shepp-Logan phantom, at positions displaced ±5 cm in x, and at a position displaced 5 cm
in y. Four different scans of pitch length 10 cm are then performed using 128 views over 360° with a 100×300
pixel (20 cm×60 cm) detector. Two scans have a fixed focal length of 50 cm between the X-ray source and
the center of rotation (COR), varying only in the starting angle of the source (0° and 90°). We call this the
circular configuration. The other two scans have a variable focal length following the curvature of the head
phantom and ranging from 37.5 cm to 50 cm. We call this the elliptical configuration. The detector rotates
with the source but maintains a constant distance of 30 cm from the COR. A likelihood gridding technique
is used to assess bias and variance in the position estimates determined from each scan configuration. We
find that the biases are small relative to the variances, and have no apparent preferred direction. Of the 24
circular to elliptical comparisons made, we find that in 14 cases the elliptical scan has a smaller variance that
is statistically significant(p ≤ 0.05). By contrast, we find no statistically significant cases in which the circular
scan gives a smaller variance compared to the elliptical scan. We conclude that using a variable focal length
adapted to the contours of the head phantom provides more precise results, but caution that this is a limited
pilot study and many more factors will be accounted for in future work.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
An accurate method for evaluating the Hotelling observer for large linear systems is generalized.
The method involves solving an m-channel channelized Hotelling observer where the channels are
refined in an iterative manner. Challenging numerical examples are shown in order to illustrate
the method and give a sense of the convergence rates as a function of m.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
To determine clinical image quality in radiography, visual grading of the reproduction of important anatomical
landmarks is often used. The rating data from the observers in a visual grading study with multiple scale steps is ordinal,
meaning that non-parametric rank-invariant statistical methods are required. However, many visual grading methods
incorrectly use parametric statistical methods. This work describes how the methodology developed in receiver operating
characteristics (ROC) analysis for characterising the difference in the observer's response to the signal and no-signal
distributions can be applied to visual grading data for characterising the difference in perceived image quality between
two systems. The method is termed visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis. In a VGC study, the task of the
observer is to rate her confidence about the fulfilment of image quality criteria. Using ROC software, the given ratings
for the two systems are then used to determine the VGC curve, which describes the relationship between the proportions
of fulfilled image criteria for the two compared systems for all possible decision thresholds. As a single measure of the
difference in image quality between the two compared systems, the area under the VGC curve can be used.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
The purpose of this study is to develop a method of ROC analysis to evaluate both the ability of individual readers to
detect abnormal findings and the detectability of abnormal findings in individual cases by applying item response theory
to the results of 1/0 judgments on presence of abnormal findings in CT image readings. The validity of the method was
verified by the following data and methods. Twenty-four readers searched for abnormal findings in 25 cases for which
there were chest CT images with defined abnormal findings. From the 1/0 judgment data for the 25 cases with CT
images (column) read by the 24 readers (row), each reader's potential ability to detect the abnormal findings (θ), the rate
of "1" judgment by each reader, i.e. confidence level for TP and FP, P(θ), and the individual image response
characteristic curves with the image as the item were calculated, from which ROC curves that represent the ability of
each reader to detect abnormal findings were created. In addition, from the 1/0 judgment data for the 25 cases with CT
images (row) read by the 24 readers (column), the potential detectability of abnormal findings for each CT image (θ)
and the rate of "1" judgment for the image by readers, i.e. confidence level for TP and FP, P(θ), were calculated, from
which ROC curves that represent the detectability of the abnormal finding in each case were created.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Aim: The study aims to help our understanding of the relationship between physical characteristics of local and global
image features and the location of visual attention by observers. Background: Neurological visual pathways are
specified at least in part by particular spatial frequency ranges at different orientations. High spatial frequencies, which
carry the information of local perturbations like edges, are assembled mainly by foveal vision, whereas peripheral vision
provides more global information coded by low frequencies. Recent visual-search studies in mammography (C Mello-Thoms et al) have shown that observers allocate visual attention to regions of the image depending on; i) spatial
frequency characteristics of regions that capture attention and ii) the level of experience of the observer. Both aspects are
considered in this study. Methods: A spatial frequency analysis of postero-anterior (PA) chest images containing
pulmonary nodules has been performed by wavelet packet transforms at different scales. This image analysis has
provided regional physical information over the whole image field on locations both with nodules present and nodules
absent. The relationship between such properties as spatial frequency, orientation, scales, contrast, and phase of localised
perturbations has been compared with eye-tracked search strategies and decision performance of observers with different
levels of expertise. Results: The work is in progress and the results of this initial stage of the project will be presented
with a critical appraisal of the methods used.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
In this study, we investigated the effect of CT reconstruction filters in abdominal CT images of a male
anthropomorphic phantom. A GE Light Speed CT 4-slice scanner was used to scan the abdomen of an adult
Rando phantom. Cross sectional images of the phantom were reconstructed using four reconstruction
filters: (1) soft tissue with the lowest noise; (2) detail (relative noise 1.7); (3) bone (relative noise 4.5); and
(4) edge (relative noise 7.7). A two Alternate Forced Choice (AFC) experimental paradigm was used to
estimate the intensity needed to achieve 92% correct (i.e., I92%). Four observers measured detection
performance for five lesions with size ranging from 2.5 to 12.5 mm for each of these four reconstruction
filters. Contrast detail curves obtained in images of an anthropomorphic phantom were not straight lines,
but best fitted to a second order polynomial. Results from four readers show similar trends with modest
inter-observer differences with the measured coefficient of variation of the absolute performance levels of
~22%. All reconstruction filters had similar shaped contrast detail curves except for smallest details where
the frequency response of filters differed most significantly. Increasing the noise level always reduced
detection performance, and a doubling of image noise resulted in an average drop in detection performance
of ~20%. The key findings of this study are that (a) the Rose model can provide reasonable predictions as
to how changes in lesion size affect observer detection; (b) the shape of CT contrast detail curves is
affected only very slightly with reconstruction filter; (c) changes in reconstruction filter noise can predict
qualitative changes in observer detection performance, but are poor direct predictors of the quantitative
changes of imaging performance.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
In this study, we investigated differences in detection performance for twelve observers who each
generated a CT contrast detail curve. An anthropomorphic newborn phantom's abdomen was imaged using
a GE Light Speed CT scanner (4-slice). Alternate Forced Choice (AFC) experiments were performed with
lesions sizes ranging from 2.5 to 12.5 mm to determine the intensity needed to achieve 92% correct (I92%).
Following training, twelve readers consisting of (2 technologists, 4 college students, 4 medical students,
and 2 radiology residents) generated a single contrast detail curve. Eight readers produced approximately
linear contrast detail curves while the remaining four readers required a second order polynomial fit
because of reduced performance when detecting the largest (i.e., 12.5 mm) lesion. For the three smallest
lesions, the coefficient of variation between the twelve readers was ~12%, which increases with increasing
lesion size to ~23% for 12.5 mm lesion size. The ratio of the maximum I92% to minimum I92% values was
~1.6 for the smallest lesions, which increased to a factor of ~2.1 for the 12.5 mm lesion. Our results show
that minimizing inter-reader variability in our AFC experiments could be achieved by eliminating the
largest lesion that cause detection problems in one third of observers. The combined experimental data
showed that the slope of the contrast detail curve was -0.42, lower than the value of -1.0 predicted by the
Rose model, suggesting that the noise texture in CT associated with both quantum mottle and anatomic
structure is an important factor affecting detection of these lesions.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
In the UK a national self-assessment scheme (PERFORMS) for mammographers is undertaken as part of the National
Health Search Breast Screening Programme. Where appropriate, further training is suggested to improve performance.
Ideally, such training would be on-demand; that is whenever and wherever an individual decides to undertake it. To use
a portable device for such a purpose would be attractive on many levels. However, it is not known whether handheld
technology can be used effectively for viewing mammographic images. Previous studies indicate the potential for
viewing medical images with fairly low spatial resolution (e.g. CT, MRI) on PDAs. In this study, we set out to
investigate factors that might affect the feasibility of using PDAs as a training technology for examining large, high
resolution mammographic images. Two studies are reported: 20 mammographers examined a series of mammograms
presented on a PDA, specifying the location of any abnormality. Secondly, a group of technologists examined a series of
mammograms presented at different sizes and resolutions to mimic presentation on a PDA and their eye movements were
recorded. The results indicate the potential for using PDAs to show such large, high resolution images if suitable
Human-computer Interaction (HCI) techniques are employed.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
A radiographic 'false negative' or a case which has been 'missed' can be categorised in terms of errors of search (where
gaze does not fall upon the abnormality); detection (a perceptual error where the abnormality may be physically 'seen'
but remains undetected) and misinterpretation (a perceptual error whereby an abnormality, although detected, is not
deemed worthy of further assessment). This study aims to investigate perceptual errors in mammographic film-reading
and will focus on the later of the two error types, namely errors of misinterpretation and errors of non-detection.
Previous research has shown, on a self-assessment scheme of recent and difficult breast-screening cases, that certain
feature types are susceptible to errors of misinterpretation and others to errors of non-detection. This self assessment
scheme, 'PERFORMS' (Personal Performance in Mammographic Screening), is undertaken by the majority (at present
over 90%) of breast-screening mammographers in the UK Breast Screening Programme. The scheme is completed biannually
and confidentially and participants receive immediate and detailed feedback on their performance. Feedback
from the scheme includes information detailing their false negative decisions including case classifications (benign or
malignant), feature type (masses, calcification, asymmetries, architectural distortions and others) and case perception
error (percentage of misinterpretation and percentage of non-detection). Results from a recent round of PERFORMS
(n=506), revealed that certain feature types had significantly higher percentages of error overall (including architectural
distortion and asymmetries), and that these feature types also showed significant differences for error type. Implications
for real-life screening practice were explored using real-life self-reported data on years of screening experience.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
We hypothesized that the current practice of radiology produces oculomotor fatigue that reduces diagnostic accuracy. The initial step in testing this hypothesis is to measure visual strain. We are approaching this by measuring visual accommodation of radiologists before and after diagnostic viewing work. We measure accommodation using the WAM-5500 Auto Refkeratometer from Grand Seiko, which collects refractive measurements and pupil diameter measurements.
The radiologists focus on a simple target while accommodation is measured. The target distances are varied from near to
far starting at 20 cm target distance from the eye to 183 cm. The data are compared for prior to and after long-term diagnostic viewing. Results indicate that we are successfully measuring visual accommodation. Accommodation at long distances does not seem to differ before and after diagnostic reading. Accommodation at near distances however does differ, with decreased ability to accommodate after many hours of diagnostic reading. Since near distances are crucial during diagnostic reading, this could have a substantial impact on diagnostic accuracy (the next phase of the project).
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
We report a study that investigated whether experienced and inexperienced radiographers benefit from knowing
where another person looked during pulmonary nodule detection. Twenty-four undergraduate radiographers (1 year
of experience) and 24 postgraduate radiographers (5+ years of experience) searched 42 chest x-rays for nodules and
rated how confident they were in their decisions. Eye movements were also recorded. Performance was compared
across three within-participant conditions: (1) free search - where radiographers could identify nodules as normal;
(2) image preview - where radiographers were first shown each chest x-ray for 20 seconds before they could then
proceed to mark the location of any nodules; and (3) eye movement preview - which was identical to image preview
except that the 20 second viewing period displayed an overlay of the real-time eye movements of another
radiographer's scanpath for that image. For this preview condition half of each group were shown where a novice
radiographer looked, and the other half were shown where an experienced radiologist looked. This was not made
known to the participants until after the experiment. Performance was assessed using JAFROC analysis. Both groups
of radiographers performed better in the eye movement preview condition compared with the image preview or free
search conditions, with inexperienced radiographers improving the most. We discuss our findings in terms of the
task-specific information interpreted from eye movement previews, task difficulty across images, and whether it
matters if radiographers are previewing the eye movements of an expert or a novice.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Using electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) technology to detect breast abnormalities in general and cancer
in particular has been attracting research interests for decades. Large clinical tests suggest that current EIS systems can
achieve high specificity (≥ 90%) at a relatively low sensitivity ranging from 15% to 35%. In this study, we explore a new
resonance frequency based electrical impedance spectroscopy (REIS) technology to measure breast tissue EIS signals in
vivo, which aims to be more sensitive to small tissue changes. Through collaboration between our imaging research
group and a commercial company, a unique prototype REIS system has been assembled and preliminary signal
acquisition has commenced. This REIS system has two detection probes mounted in the two ends of a Y-shape support
device with probe separation of 60 mm. During REIS measurement, one probe touches the nipple and the other touches
to an outer point of the breast. The electronic system continuously generates sweeps of multi-frequency electrical pulses
ranging from 100 to 4100 kHz. The maximum electric voltage and the current applied to the probes are 1.5V and 30mA,
respectively. Once a "record" command is entered, multi-frequency sweeps are recorded every 12 seconds until the
program receives a "stop recording" command. In our imaging center, we have collected REIS measurements from 150
women under an IRB approved protocol. The database includes 58 biopsy cases, 78 screening negative cases, and other
"recalled" cases (for additional imaging procedures). We measured eight signal features from the effective REIS sweep
of each breast. We applied a multi-feature based artificial neural network (ANN) to classify between "biopsy" and
normal "non-biopsy" breasts. The ANN performance is evaluated using a leave-one-out validation method and ROC
analysis. We conducted two experiments. The first experiment attempted to classify 58 "biopsy" breasts and 58 "non-biopsy"
breasts acquired on 58 women each having one breast recommended for biopsy. The second experiment
attempted to classify 58 "biopsy" breasts and 58 negative breasts from the set of screening negative cases. The areas
under ROC curves are 0.679 ± 0.033 and 0.606 ± 0.035 for the first and the second experiment, respectively. The
preliminary results demonstrate (1) even with this rudimentary system with only one paired probes there is a measurable
signal of changes in breast tissue demonstrating the feasibility of applying REIS technology for identifying at least some
women with highly suspicious breast abnormalities and (2) the electromagnetic asymmetry between two breasts may be
more sensitive in detecting changes in the abnormal breast. To further improve the REIS system performance, we are
currently designing a new REIS system with multiple electrical probes and a more sophisticated analysis scheme.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Evaluating the placement of multiple coronary stents requires fine judgments of distance between two or more deployed
stents in order to determine if there is continuous coverage without a gap or overlap between the two. These judgments
are made difficult by limited system resolution, noise, relatively low contrast of the deployed stent, and stent motion
during the cardiac cycle. In this work, we assess the effect of frame rate and number of frames used in a sequence on the
detection accuracy of gaps between the stents. Both of these factors can be used to reduce patient dose. We use real X-ray
coronary angiograms as backgrounds along with stents imaged separately with Lucite for similar beam attenuation.
Stents and simulated guidewires are embedded in the angiograms by adding optical densities after scatter subtraction.
Realistic motion is rendered by manually synchronizing the stent densities to vascular features in each image. We find
no significant difference the different frame rates or sequence lengths, indicating potential savings in dose.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
The purpose of this work is to evaluate the performance of a computer based analysis system aimed at the
quantitative detection of changes in hip osteolytic lesions in subjects with hip implants. The computer system
is based on the supervised segmentation of a baseline x-ray computed-tomography (CT) scan and an
automated segmentation of a follow-up CT scan using an object based tracking algorithm. The segmentation
process outlines the pelvic bone and lesions present in the pelvis. The size and CT density of the osteolytic
lesions are computed in both baseline and follow-up segmentations and the change in both these quantities
are evaluated. The system analysis consisted of the direct comparison of the quantitative results obtained
from an expert manual segmentation to the quantitative results obtained using the automated system on 20
subjects. The system bias was evaluated by performing forwards and backwards analysis of the CT data.
Furthermore, the stability of the proposed tracking system was compared to the variability of the manual
tracking. The results show that the system enhances the human ability to detect changes in lesions size and
density regardless of the inherent observer variability in the definition of the baseline manual segmentation.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
An image-processing method has been developed to improve the visibility of tube and catheter features in portable chest
x-ray (CXR) images captured in the intensive care unit (ICU). The image-processing method is based on a multi-frequency
approach, wherein the input image is decomposed into different spatial frequency bands, and those bands that
contain the tube and catheter signals are individually enhanced by nonlinear boosting functions. Using a random
sampling strategy, 50 cases were retrospectively selected for the study from a large database of portable CXR images
that had been collected from multiple institutions over a two-year period. All images used in the study were captured
using photo-stimulable, storage phosphor computed radiography (CR) systems. Each image was processed two ways.
The images were processed with default image processing parameters such as those used in clinical settings (control).
The 50 images were then separately processed using the new tube and catheter enhancement algorithm (test). Three
board-certified radiologists participated in a reader study to assess differences in both detection-confidence performance
and diagnostic efficiency between the control and test images. Images were evaluated on a diagnostic-quality, 3-megapixel monochrome monitor. Two scenarios were studied: the baseline scenario, representative of today's workflow
(a single-control image presented with the window/level adjustments enabled) vs. the test scenario (a control/test image
pair presented with a toggle enabled and the window/level settings disabled). The radiologists were asked to read the
images in each scenario as they normally would for clinical diagnosis. Trend analysis indicates that the test scenario
offers improved reading efficiency while providing as good or better detection capability compared to the baseline
scenario.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Heinar A. Weiderpass, Jorge F. Yamamoto, Solange R. Salomão, Adriana Berezovsky, Josenilson M. Pereira, Paula Y. Sacai, José Pedro de Oliveira, Marcio A. Costa, Marcelo N. Burattini
Proceedings Volume Medical Imaging 2008: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 69171A (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.770371
Visually evoked potential (VEP) is a very small electrical signal originated in the visual cortex in response to periodic
visual stimulation. Sweep-VEP is a modified VEP procedure used to measure grating visual acuity in non-verbal and
preverbal patients. This biopotential is buried in a large amount of electroencephalographic (EEG) noise and movement
related artifact. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) plays a dominant role in determining both systematic and statistic errors.
The purpose of this study is to present a method based on wavelet transform technique for filtering and extracting steady-state
sweep-VEP. Counter-phase sine-wave luminance gratings modulated at 6 Hz were used as stimuli to determine
sweep-VEP grating acuity thresholds. The amplitude and phase of the second-harmonic (12 Hz) pattern reversal response
were analyzed using the fast Fourier transform after the wavelet filtering. The wavelet transform method was used to
decompose the VEP signal into wavelet coefficients by a discrete wavelet analysis to determine which coefficients yield
significant activity at the corresponding frequency. In a subsequent step only significant coefficients were considered and
the remaining was set to zero allowing a reconstruction of the VEP signal. This procedure resulted in filtering out other
frequencies that were considered noise. Numerical simulations and analyses of human VEP data showed that this method
has provided higher SNR when compared with the classical recursive least squares (RLS) method. An additional
advantage was a more appropriate phase analysis showing more realistic second-harmonic amplitude value during phase
brake.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Technological developments of computed tomography (CT) have led to a drastic increase of its clinical utilization,
creating concerns about patient exposure. To better control dose to patients, we propose a methodology to find an
objective compromise between dose and image quality by means of a visual discrimination model.
A GE LightSpeed-Ultra scanner was used to perform the acquisitions. A QRM 3D low contrast resolution phantom
(QRM - Germany) was scanned using CTDIvol values in the range of 1.7 to 103 mGy. Raw data obtained with the
highest CTDIvol were afterwards processed to simulate dose reductions by white noise addition. Noise realism of the
simulations was verified by comparing normalized noise power spectra aspect and amplitudes (NNPS) and standard
deviation measurements. Patient images were acquired using the Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) proposed in
Switzerland. Noise reduction was then simulated, as for the QRM phantom, to obtain five different CTDIvol levels, down
to 3.0 mGy.
Image quality of phantom images was assessed with the Sarnoff JNDmetrix visual discrimination model and compared
to an assessment made by means of the ROC methodology, taken as a reference. For patient images a similar approach
was taken but using as reference the Visual Grading Analysis (VGA) method.
A relationship between Sarnoff JNDmetrix and ROC results was established for low contrast detection in phantom
images, demonstrating that the Sarnoff JNDmetrix can be used for qualification of images with highly correlated noise.
Patient image qualification showed a threshold of conspicuity loss only for children over 35 kg.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
The purpose of this work was to test procedures for applying scanning model observers in order to predict human-observer
lesion-detection performance with hybrid images. Hybrid images consist of clinical backgrounds with
simulated abnormalities. The basis for this investigation was detection and localization of solitary pulmonary
nodules (SPN) in SPECT lung images, and our overall goal has been to determine the extent to which detection
of SPN could be improved by proper modeling of the acquisition physics during the iterative reconstruction
process. Towards this end, we conducted human-observer localization ROC (LROC) studies to optimize the
number of iterations and the postfiltering of four rescaled block-iterative (RBI) reconstruction strategies with
various combinations of attenuation correction (AC), scatter correction (SC), and system-resolution correction
(RC). This observer data was then used to evaluate a scanning channelized nonprewhitening model observer.
A standard "background-known-exactly" (BKE) task formulation overstated the prior knowledge and training
that human observers had about the hybrid images. Results from a quasi-BKE task that preserved some degree
of structural noise in the detection task demonstrated better agreement with the humans.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
We consider the problem of optimizing collimator characteristics for a simple emission tomographic imaging
system. We use the performance of two different ideal observers to carry out the optimization. The first ideal
observer applies to signal detection when signal location is unknown and background is variable, and the second
ideal observer (one proposed previously by our group) to the more realistic task of signal detection and localization
with signal location unknown and background variable. The two observers operate on sinogram data to deliver
scalar figures of merit AROC and ALROC, respectively. We considered three different collimators that span a
range of efficiency-resolution tradeoffs. Our central question is this: For optimizing the collimator in an emission
tomographic system, does adding a localization requirement to a detection task yield an efficiency-resolution
tradeoff that differs from that for the detection-only task? Our simulations with a simple SPECT imaging
system show that as the localization requirement becomes more stringent, the optimal collimator shifts from
a low-resolution, high efficiency version toward higher resolution, lower efficiency version. We had previously
observed such behavior for a planar pinhole imaging system. In our simulations, we used a simplified model of
tomographic imaging and a simple model for object background variability. This allowed us to avoid the severe
computational complexity associated with ideal-observer performance calculations. Thus the more realistic task
(i.e. localization included) resulted for this case in a different optimal collimator.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
We have developed and reported a super-high resolution liquid crystal display (SHR-LCD) using a new resolution
enhancement technology of the independent sub-pixel driving (ISD) that utilizes three sub-pixels in each pixel
element. This technology realizes the three-times resolution enhancement of monochrome LCDs, and improves the
depiction ability of detailed shape such as micro-calcifications of a mammography and bone structures.
Furthermore, the ISD technology brings not only resolution enhancement but also noise reduction effect by the
high-resolution data sampling in displaying the clinical images.
In this study, we examined the efficacy of the newly developed LCDs from the noise power spectrum
measurement (NPS), the perceptual comparison of the phantom images and the clinical images. A 15 mega-pixel
(MP)SHR-LCD out of a 5MP LCD and a 6MP SHR-LCD out of a 2MP LCD were used for the measurement and
the evaluation. In the NPS measurements, the noise of all the SHR-LCDs was improved obviously. The
improvement degree of the NPS varied according to the sub-sampling ratio of the data sampling implemented
during the image displaying, and the 6MP LCD showed higher improvement. In the perceptual evaluation of the
quality-control phantom images and the low-contrast images of the micro-calcifications of the mammography, all
the SHR-LCDs provided higher performance than the conventional LCDs. These results proved that the SHR-LCDs
using the ISD technology had the excellent ability to display the high-resolution clinical images.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
In the UK Breast Screening Programme there is a growing transition from film to digital mammography, and
consequently a change in mammography workstation ergonomics. This paper investigates the effect of the change for
radiologists including their comfort, likelihood of developing musculoskeletal disorders (MSD's), and work practices.
Three workstations types were investigated: one with all film mammograms; one with digital mammograms alongside
film mammograms from the previous screening round, and one with digital mammograms alongside digitised film
mammograms from the previous screening round. Mammographers were video-taped whilst conducting work sessions at
each of the workstations. Event based Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) postural analysis showed no overall
increase in MSD risk level in the switch from the film to digital workstation. Average number of visual glances at the
prior mammograms per case measured by analysis of recorded video footage showed an increase if the prior
mammograms were digitised, rather than displayed on a multi-viewer (p<.05). This finding has potential implications for
mammographer performance in the transition to digital mammography in the UK.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
The objective of this study was to compare the detection of microcalcifications and fibers on phantom images based on
monitor readings versus analog image readings. 180 films were obtained with 3 different mammographic equipment
under different exposure conditions and digitized using the Lumiscan75 scanner. It was used the ALVIM statistical
phantom (4,5cm) and 2 acrylic plates of 1cm (6,5cm) over it. The software named QualIM was developed to manager the
images and the database which storages the specialist's readings allowing them digital tools manipulation. The images
were displayed on 4 monitors: CRT Philips 19" (2,9Mpixels/8bits), CRT Philips 22" (3,0Mpixels/8bits), LCD Clinton
(3,0Mpixels/10bits) and LCD Barco (5,0Mpixels/14bits). The same images group was also displayed on the appropriated
view box to mammograms (3200cd/m2) and the readings performance was taken as reference parameter. The software
generates on real time Kappa values to microcalcifications and fibers detection, histogram, ROC curve and true/false
positive parameters. Barco monitor readings produced superior results when compared with all the others suggesting that
there weren't losses in the digitalizing process. Clinton monitor readings were similar the view box results and superior
on both Philips monitors when compared the detection of objects on phantom images (6,5cm). The specialist
performance results using Philips 22" were only comparable to view box and Clinton for images of 4,5cm. It was
possible to verify that the monitors' spatial and contrast resolutions have influenced on the readings performance of
specialists, suggesting these characteristics are relevant at lesions detection performance in mammographic exams.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Visualisation of anatomical or pathological image data is highly dependent on the eye's ability to discriminate between
image brightnesses and this is best achieved when these data are presented to the viewer at luminance levels to which the
eye is adapted. Current ambient light recommendations are often linked to overall monitor luminance but this relies on
specific regions of interest matching overall monitor brightness.
The current work investigates the luminances of specific regions of interest within three image-types: postero-anterior
(PA) chest; PA wrist; computerised tomography (CT) of the head. Luminance levels were measured within the hilar
region and peripheral lung distal radius and supra-ventricular grey matter. For each image type average monitor
luminances were calculated with a calibrated photometer at ambient light levels of 0, 100 and 400 lux. Thirty samples of
each image-type were employed, resulting in a total of over 6,000 measurements.
Results demonstrate that average monitor luminances varied from clinically-significant values by up to a factor of 4, 2
and 6 for chest, wrist and CT head images respectively. Values for the thoracic hilum and wrist were higher and for the
peripheral lung and CT brain lower than overall monitor levels. The ambient light level had no impact on the results.
The results demonstrate that clinically important radiological information for common radiological examinations is not
being presented to the viewer in a way that facilitates optimised visual adaptation and subsequent interpretation. The
importance of image-processing algorithms focussing on clinically-significant anatomical regions instead of radiographic
projections is highlighted.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Traditional diagnostic modalities have been, for the most part, static two-dimensional images displayed on film
or computer screen. More recent diagnostic modalities are solely computer-based and consist of large data-sets
of multiple images. Image perception and visual search using these new modalities are complicated by the need
to interact with the computer in order to navigate through the data. This paper reports the late-breaking results
from two small studies into visual search within two types of CT Colonography (CTC) visualisations. The twelve
novice observers in the study were taking part in a week-long course in CTC and were tested at the beginning
and end of the course. A number of expert observers were also recorded. The two visualisations used in the
study were 2D axial view and 3D colon fly-through. In both cases, searching was performed by inspecting the
colon wall, but by two distinct mechanisms. The first study recorded observer eye-gaze and image navigation in
a CTC axial view. The search strategy was to follow the lumen of the colon and detect abnormalities in the colon
wall. The observer used the physical computer interface to navigate through the set of axial images to perform
this task. The 3D fly-through study recorded observer eye-gaze whilst watching a recording of a computed flight
through the colon lumen. Unlike the axial view there was no computer control, so inspection of the colon surface
was dictated by the speed of flight through the colon.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.