You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
13 December 1983Quality Assurance in a National Breast Screening Study
In order to provide quality assurance for the National Breast Screening Study currently underway in Canada, a mailed survey package was designed which allows for the monitoring of i) the exposure for the "average" craniocaudad view, ii) beam quality, iii) speed, contrast, and fog parameters of the film processing, and iv) the overall image quality. As well, measurements were made of depth-dose curves to a breast phantom for a number of techniques so that mean glandular dose to the breast could be estimated from entrance exposures. To measure the duration of the x-ray exposure, a device which uses a photodiode to detect scattered radiation from the breast was designed and has been used to check consistency of phototiming and x-ray output. At one centre, the average skin exposure for the craniocaudad view was 295 mR. The range was 150 - 800 mR, due to differences in tissue density and distribution, breast thickness and compression. The mean glandular dose was estimated to be 66 mrad. For the intercomparison of imaging at the centres, identical lucite phantoms have been constructed and distributed which require an exposure time similar to that of the "average" breast. An aluminum step wedge built up of 15 sheets of 0.4mm Al is used to obtain "sensitometric" curves for the mailed survey. Some of the factors responsible for the variation in patient dose and image quality in the study are discussed.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Martin J. Yaffe, Gordon E. Mawdsley, Robert M. Nishikawa, "Quality Assurance in a National Breast Screening Study," Proc. SPIE 0419, Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine XI, (13 December 1983); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.936000