14 February 2017 Comparison and use of 3D scanners to improve the quantification of medical images (surface structures and volumes) during follow up of clinical (surgical) procedures
Author Affiliations +
It is difficult to obtain quantitative measurements as to surface areas and volumes from standard photos of the body parts of patients which is highly desirable for objective follow up of treatments in e.g. dermatology. plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. Recently, 3-D scanners have become available to provide quantification.

Phantoms (3-D printed hand, nose and ear, colored bread sculpture) were developed to compare a range from low-cost (Sense), medium (HP Sprout) to high end (Artec Spider, Vectra M3) scanners using different 3D imaging technologies, as to resolution, working range, surface color representation, user friendliness. The 3D scans files (STL, OBJ) were processed with Artec studio and GOM software as to deviation compared to the high resolution Artec Spider scanner taken as ‘golden’ standard. The HP Spout, which uses a fringe projection, proved to be nearly as good as the Artec, however, needs to be converted for clinical use. Photogrammetry as used by the Vectra M3 scanner is limited to provide sufficient data points for accurate surface mapping however provides good color/structure representation. The low performance of the Sense is not recommended for clinical use. The Artec scanner was successfully used to measure the structure/volume changes in the face after hormone treatment in transgender patients.

3D scanners can greatly improve quantitative measurements of surfaces and volumes as objective follow up in clinical studies performed by various clinical specialisms (dermatology, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery). New scanning technologies, like fringe projection, are promising for development of low-cost, high precision scanners.
Conference Presentation
© (2017) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Niki Tokkari, Niki Tokkari, Rudolf M. Verdaasdonk, Rudolf M. Verdaasdonk, Niels Liberton, Niels Liberton, Jan Wolff, Jan Wolff, Martin den Heijer, Martin den Heijer, Albert van der Veen, Albert van der Veen, John H. Klaessens, John H. Klaessens, } "Comparison and use of 3D scanners to improve the quantification of medical images (surface structures and volumes) during follow up of clinical (surgical) procedures", Proc. SPIE 10054, Advanced Biomedical and Clinical Diagnostic and Surgical Guidance Systems XV, 100540Z (14 February 2017); doi: 10.1117/12.2253241; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2253241


A flexible 3D laser scanning system using a robotic arm
Proceedings of SPIE (June 26 2017)
Comparison of Cyberware PX and PS 3D human head scanners
Proceedings of SPIE (February 25 2008)
More than a poplar plank the shape and subtle...
Proceedings of SPIE (January 29 2007)
Surface imaging of the human body
Proceedings of SPIE (September 09 1994)

Back to Top