You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
24 March 2017Vote-taking for EUV lithography: a radical approach to mitigate mask defects
Vote-taking lithography sums up N mask images, each at 1/N dose, to mitigate the mask defects on each individual mask. The fundamental assumption is that the mask defects do not correlate in position from mask to mask, and so each individual defect will be blended with good images from the other N-1 masks. This paper will explore vote-taking for EUV lithography with both simulation and experimental results. PROLITH simulations will show the size of defects that can be healed for different N, the number of masks. SEM images of NXE 3300 exposures will be shown that are similar to those predicted from simulation. The implementation of vote-taking lithography for High Volume Manufacturing has huge practical and economic barriers. Some expose tool capabilities that could enable vote-taking lithography will be discussed. Besides defect mitigation, we briefly speculate on other possible imaging benefits opened up by voting with several exposure passes.