24 January 2000 Overview of lasers in dermatology
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 10297, Matching the Energy Source to the Clinical Need: A Critical Review; 1029702 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.375211
Event: Digital Optical Computing, 1990, Los Angeles, United States
Abstract
Research over the last 40 years has provided information on laser-tissue interactions and led to the development of many lasers used for a variety of dermatologic procedures. In this review, we discuss the current state of laser use in dermatology including the treatment of vascular lesions, tattoo removal, treatment of pigmented lesions, hair removal and laser skin resurfacing. In addition, we note several issues which need to be addressed in order to achieve an improved therapeutic outcome without adverse effects.
Kelly and Nelson: Overview of lasers in dermatology

1.

INTRODUCTION

An improved understanding of the optical characteristics of human skin has allowed researchers to concentrate on basic physical and photobiologic principles of laser-tissue interaction. Lasers utilized in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, and early 1990s offered few possibilities for modification. However, modern technology allows us to manipulate the physical characteristics of lasers and design them for specific therapeutic purposes.

1.1

Selective Photothermolysis and Spatially Selective Photocoagulation

The laser has many inherent physical properties that can be manipulated to effect a specific biologic outcome. Selective photothermolysis was described by R. Rox Anderson in 1983 as a means of achieving targeted chromophore destruction and remains the guiding principle for laser dermatology today1. Wavelength and pulse duration of light exposure are central to this concept.

In order to achieve selective damage of a chromophore within human skin, the laser wavelength must approximate an absorption peak of the targeted chromophore in relation to other optically absorbing molecules. Choice of wavelength also determines the depth to which light penetrates with sufficient energy to effect tissue change. In the case of cutaneous blood vessels, the targeted chromophore is oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) which has the Soret absorption band at 418 nm and additional absorption bands at 542 and 577 nm. While the Soret band has the highest absorption coefficient, this wavelength is not optimal for clinical use because photon penetration is insufficient to destroy dermal vessels deeper than 0.1mm from the surface. Further, light absorption by melanin, which is greatest in the ultraviolet range and decreases rapidly through the visible and near-infrared wavelengths, is higher at the Soret band as compared to the other HbO2 absorption peaks, resulting in nonspecific thermal injury of the epidermis. By taking advantage of the HbO2 absorption band at 577 nm, tissue penetration is increased and melanin absorption reduced resulting in less epidermal heating and transmission of more incident light energy to the target blood vessels.

Pulse duration is another important laser parameter relevant to the goal of achieving precise control of thermal energy. One way to maximize the spatial confinement of heat is to use a laser with a pulse duration on the order of the thermal relaxation time (Tr) of the targeted chromophore. Tr is the duration required for the heat generated by absorbed light energy within the target chromophore to dissipate to 50% of its value immediately after laser exposure. This value is directly proportional to the square of the diameter of the target and inversely proportional to the thermal diffusivity of the tissue. Longer pulse durations result in heat diffusion away from the targeted structure leading to generalized heating and less spatial selectivity regardless of careful wavelength selection and may result in nonspecific thermal damage. However, if the laser pulse is suitably brief, energy is invested in the target chromophore before much heat is lost out of the exposure field by thermal diffusion resulting in a maximum transient temperature differential between the target and adjacent structures. Shorter pulse durations confine laser energy to small targets with more spatial selectivity. The transition from specific to nonspecific thermal damage occurs as the laser exposure equals and then exceeds Tr. Lasers emitting at a selectively absorbed wavelength with a pulse duration less than Tr can achieve highly selective target damage.

Selective photothermolysis significantly improved patient outcome; however, therapeutic challenges remained including incomplete lesion removal despite multiple treatments and a low, but significant incidence of adverse effects. In many cases, these problems arose because of nonspecific epidermal absorption of laser energy. Epidermal melanin represents an “optical barrier” through which the light must pass to reach the targeted dermal chromophore. Absorption of laser energy by epidermal melanin reduces the light dosage reaching the target, thereby decreasing the amount of heat produced in the target leading to sub-optimal removal of the lesion. Moreover, melanin absorption causes localized heating of the epidermis, which may, if not controlled, produce permanent complications such as scarring or dyspigmentation. Unfortunately, for many lesions the threshold for epidermal damage following laser therapy is lower than that for target chromophore destruction.

In an attempt to address the aforementioned problems, various cooling modalities including application of ice packs, chilled running water, and chilled substrates such as sapphire plates have been utilized to protect the epidermis during pulsed laser exposure 2-4. However, none of the above has proven entirely satisfactory nor, most importantly, led to improved therapeutic outcome. All previously tried methods have failed due to the thermal response of human skin to sustained cooling when a near-steady-state temperature distribution is established. Therefore, in addition to cooling the epidermis, sustained cooling also reduces the temperature of the targeted dermal chromophore. Any increase in the threshold fluence for epidermal damage achieved by a reduction in the temperature is almost entirely offset by the additional energy required to heat the target chromophores to a temperature sufficient for permanent lesion removal.

Spatially selective photocoagulation is the process of providing epidermal protection while still achieving thermal injury in the dermis. In 1994, Nelson et al. described a novel, efficient and effective method of achieving spatially selective photocoagulation, “dynamic” or cryogen spray cooling (CSC) 5,6. A millisecond cryogen spurt is applied to the skin surface immediately before laser exposure allowing localized cooling of the epidermis without affecting the deeper targeted structures, leaving them susceptible to laser induced thermal injury. Spatially selective photocoagulation has been implemented most successfully for the treatment of port wine stain (PWS) birthmarks and other hypervascular skin lesions but has also been utilized to improve outcomes and decrease the incidence of adverse effects associated with other laser procedures including hair removal and laser skin resurfacing.

In this review, we discuss the current state of laser use in dermatology and note issues which remain to be addressed by future scientific innovations.

2.

TREATMENT OF VASCULAR LESIONS

A wide variety of hypervascular skin lesions are amenable to laser therapy (Table 1). PWS are congenital vascular malformations which may be disfiguring as they are most often found on the face and neck. There is extensive literature on PWS laser therapy and in many cases similar treatment parameters can be applied to other vascular lesions on comparable anatomic locations. Lower extremity lesions such as leg veins require special consideration and will be discussed at the end of this section.

Table 1.

Hypervascular lesions amenable to laser treatment

Port Wine StainsAngiokeratomas
Capillary HemangiomasSpider Angiomas
Cherry AngiomasFacial Telangiectasias
Venous LakesTelangiectatic Leg Veins
Poikiloderma of Civatte 

As previously discussed, the target chromophore for vascular lesions is HbO2 which has absorption peaks at 418, 542, and 577 nm 7. The radiant energy of the laser is preferentially absorbed by HbO2 within the vascular lesion and converted to heat which results in thermal damage and vessel thrombosis. The argon laser was the first device utilized for the treatment of vascular lesions. However, this laser’s blue-green light (488, 514 nm) did not match any of the HbO2 absorption peaks and melanin absorption was significant at these relatively short wavelengths. Furthermore, the shortest achievable pulse duration was 0.01 second, far longer than the 1-10 milliseconds considered optimal based on the average diameter (30 – 150 μm) of targeted blood vessels 8,9. As a result, scarring was common occurring in up to 40% of infants and young children receiving laser treatment for PWS birthmarks 10,11.

The flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser (FLPDL) was introduced in the early 1980s. This laser uses an organic dye as the lasing medium and can achieve high peak power, 0.45 millisecond, single pulses ideal for targeting specific chromophores. The 585 nm wavelength, although not one of the HbO2 absorption peaks, was determined to be optimal as it allows a greater depth of light penetration into human skin (1.20 mm at 585 nm versus 0.50 mm at 577 nm) while maintaining nearly the same degree of vascular specificity 12. The FLPDL has become the treatment of choice for PWS and can achieve 50% fading in 75% of patients 13.

Complete PWS fading after a single treatment using the FLPDL is rare. Most patients require multiple treatments of the same area to obtain optimal fading. The number of treatments required varies with anatomic location. Lesions overlying bony prominences, such as the nose, forehead and temple, generally respond faster than those on the lips and cheek. PWS on the trunk and extremities require more (10-20) treatments. Patients less than 7 years of age require fewer treatments to achieve optimal response than older patients. Flat, immature PWS achieve the best treatment response while nodular hypertrophic PWS respond the least. Treatments are repeated at 8-12 week intervals.

The safety of this therapy has been demonstrated in multiple studies14-17 as well as our own extensive experience 18. Purpura, a bruised-like skin appearance, lasts 7-14 days post treatment and is the major morbidity following FLPDL irradiation. Hyperpigmentation occurs in up to 35% of patients but is temporary 14-16. Scarring is uncommon, occurring in fewer than 5% of patients and is often treatable with topical or intralesional steroids 15,17.

The FLPDL offers significant advantages over lasers previously utilized for vascular lesion removal; however, as noted above, incomplete lesion removal despite multiple treatments remains a clinically significant problem. Spatially selective photocoagulation is one method of improving therapeutic outcome while minimizing adverse effects. Candela Corporation’s (Wayland, MA) ScleroPLUS® offers a pulse duration of 1.5 ms and wavelengths from 585-600 nm in combination with cryogen spray cooling (CSC). The longer pulse duration allows treatment of larger blood vessels and, because the vessels are heated more slowly, results in less purpura. The longer wavelengths allow laser light to penetrate further into individual vessels and permit injury of vessels deeper in the vascular plexus. However, at wavelengths longer than 585 nm, light absorption by HbO2 rapidly decreases and higher fluences are required. CSC in combination with the FLPDL allows the use of higher incident laser light dosages which expedite PWS clearing 19. In addition, treatment pain is decreased especially in patients with darker skin types20-22. Excellent PWS clearance without adverse effects has been reported for the treatment of PWS, hemangiomas, telangiectasia and other vascular lesions.

Coherent Inc. (Palo Alto, CA) offers a 532 nm potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser containing a hand-piece with an attachable chilled sapphire plate that is cooled by circulating water. The chilled plate must be kept in close contact with the skin surface during laser irradiation. Pulse widths of 2-50 ms are available resulting in little or no post-treatment purpura as the vessel is heated slowly. Because of the absence of purpura, many patients prefer this option over pulsed dye laser treatment. Some success has been reported with the use of the KTP laser for the treatment of PWS 23 and it may be an option for those lesions resistant to pulsed dye laser treatment. This laser has been used for treatment of facial telangiectasias with good results and minimal side effects 24,25.

An alternative method for treating vascular lesions, an intense pulsed light source, (IPLS) was developed by Sharplan-ESC Medical Systems Ltd. (Yokneam, Israel). A high energy flashlamp emits non-coherent light (515-1200 nm) utilizing cut-off filters (515, 550, 570 or 590 nm) to eliminate shorter wavelengths. It is suggested that the non-coherent light will allow thermocoagulation of a wide range of vessel sizes and depths 26. Some good results have been reported utilizing this system for the treatment of facial PWS and telangiectasias 24,27 but further research is required for technique optimization.

A wide variety of other hypervascular lesions including hemangiomas, cherry angiomas, spider angiomas, venous lakes, poikiloderma of Civatte, angiokeratomas, and facial telangiectasias have benefited from laser therapy which is now considered the treatment modality of choice.

Laser treatment of telangiectatic or spider leg veins is a topic which has generated considerable interest during the last several years. These vessels pose unique treatment challenges because of increased hydrostatic pressure and wide variability in target vessel size. There are currently many laser systems available for the treatment of leg veins (Table 2) each with unique options including cooling methods.

Table 2:

Lasers available for the treatment of leg telangiectasia

Laser/ManufacturerWavelengthsSpecial Features
Versa Pulse® Coherent, Inc.532 nmChilled tip
VeinLase® HGM532, 1064 nm 
Photogenica VLS®-Pulsed Dye Laser Cynosure585-600 nm 
ScleroPLUS® Candela Corporation585-600 nm1.5 ms pulse duration Dynamic Cooling Device
LPIR-Alexandrite laser® Cynosure755 nm 
Vasculight® ESC/Sharplan1064 nm 
Photoderm VL/PL® ESC/Sharplan515-1200 nm8x35 mm handpiece

An extensive discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each of these lasers is beyond the scope of this review. However, a clinically significant incidence of side effects especially hyper- and hypo-pigmentation, is generally reported and treatment results are highly variable 23,28. Most experts agree that sclerotherapy remains the treatment of choice for lower leg telangiectasias but laser treatment may be useful in patients with small spider veins (<0.5 mm diameter), those refusing sclerotherapy secondary to needle phobia, and those with telangiectatic matting.

3.

TATTOO REMOVAL

Previous methods of tattoo removal included excision with primary closure or skin grafting, mechanical dermabrasion, salabrasion, cryosurgery, or application of caustic chemicals such as phenol, all of which resulted in significant scarring. Argon and carbon dioxide lasers were the first lasers evaluated for tattoo removal 29-31. However, those lasers eliminated tattoo pigment by removal of successive layers of skin rather than color-selective light absorption. Non-specific thermal damage occurred which resulted in subsequent scar formation.

Organometallic dyes, India ink, amorphous carbon and graphite typically found in amateur and professional tattoos have a broad absorption in the visible portion of the light spectrum. At visible wavelengths longer than 600 nm, HbO2 and melanin light absorption is minimized and tattoo dyes can be targeted selectively 32. The pigment granules characteristically found in tattoos have diameters of 0.5-100 μm which corresponds to thermal relaxation times of 20 ns to 3 ms1.

With the development of Q-switched lasers, each with a unique wavelength able to target different pigments (Table 3), tattoo removal without scarring could be achieved for the first time. Q-switching is a mechanism used to control light output by concentrating energy into a single, intense pulse of nanosecond duration. A Pockel’s cell or fast electromagnetic switch causes excitation of the active medium to build up in the laser cavity. Lasing is prevented by a shutter which is then opened resulting in a burst of energy. The Q-switched ruby laser utilizes high intensity flashlamps to excite a ruby crystal (aluminum trioxide doped with chromium ions) and emits red light at a wavelength of 694 nm. The Q-switched Alexandrite laser is a solid-state laser containing a chrysoberyl crystal of aluminum tetraoxide (BeO:Al2O3) doped with Cr ions and also emits red light but with a wavelength of 755 nm.

Table 3.

Q-switched lasers for the treatment of tattoos

LaserWavelengths (nm)Tattoo Color
QS Ruby694Blue, Black, Green
QS Alexandrite755Multi-colored
QS Nd:YAG1064Multi-colored
QS frequency doubled Nd:YAG532Red

The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser contains a crystal of yttrium aluminum-garnet (YAG) doped with neodymium (Nd) ions which is excited by xenon arc lamps to emit a near infra-red wavelength of 1064 nm. Tattoo pigment absorption is decreased at this longer wavelength but the light is sufficiently absorbed to achieve selective photothermolysis. Benefits of this laser include deeper light penetration (4-6 mm) into human skin and decreased melanin light absorption and thus, a decreased risk of dyspigmentation. The frequency doubled Q-switched Nd:YAG laser is created by inserting a KTP crystal in the light beam’s path resulting in an emitted wavelength of 532 nm which provides improved removal of red dye.

The exact mechanism of laser tattoo removal is unknown but several theories have been postulated 33. First, during Q-switched laser treatment, light energy is absorbed by the pigment and converted to heat, causing a chemical alteration in the pigment granule structure sufficient to alter the optical properties of the tattoo, making it less apparent. Second, the altered tattoo pigment particles are eliminated by re-phagocytosis. Third, external elimination occurs as post-treatment crust is sloughed.

Complete tattoo removal after one treatment is rare. Multiple treatment sessions are required and complete elimination can not be guaranteed due to pigment depth and chemical composition variability. Amateur tattoos generally have a lower concentration of pigment and therefore require fewer treatments than those professionally done. Further, the organometallic dyes used for professional tattoos may be thermally and mechanically more stable than the India ink, graphite, amorphous carbon, and cigarette ash found in amateur tattoos. Dark colors, especially black and blue, generally have higher absorption and respond better to laser treatment than light colors. Orange and yellow respond least well. Lasers are also useful for removal of traumatic and cosmetic tattoos.

While lasers have dramatically reduced the incidence of scarring associated with tattoo removal, other adverse effects do occur. Post-treatment hyper- and hypo-pigmentation are the most common. Strict sun avoidance pre- and post-treatment is important to minimize this risk. Red, white, and flesh-colored tattoos generally used for eyebrow, eye or lip liner have changed to black, brown, blue or green after laser treatment. The mechanism of this change may involve the reduction of ferric oxide (Fe2O3) pigment to ferrous oxide (FeO)34. Some reported cases responded to further laser sessions but others required surgical excision 34,35. Since the occurrence of this adverse effect can not be accurately predicted and may not be immediately apparent, test sites are advisable. Cutaneous and even occasionally systemic allergic reactions to altered tattoo pigments especially cadmium, chromium, cobalt or mercury containing inks have also been reported 36 Prophylaxis with prednisone and hydroxyzine may be required for subsequent treatments.

Future possibilities for improved tattoo removal include the use of lasers with picosecond pulse durations 37,38. It has been proposed that while the nanosecond pulse duration of Q-switched lasers results in thermal damage confinement to the pigmented granule, thermoelastic expansion occurs resulting in mechanical stress.

Lasers with picosecond pulse durations may confine both thermal and photomechanical damage and thus, achieve more effective pigment removal. In the future it may also be possible to define tissue reflectance characteristics of individual tattoos to help determine which laser will achieve maximum absorption and destruction of the targeted pigment color 39. Finally, the development of inks more amenable to laser removal and the use of spatially selective photocoagulation for this indication have been proposed.

4.

TREATMENT OF PIGMENTED LESIONS

Lasers have also been successfully utilized to treat a wide variety of pigmented lesions (Table 4). The target chromophore is melanin and lesion resolution is thought to be secondary to melanosome disruption as a result of thermal injury or shock wave induced thermal expansion 40,41. Melanin has a broad absorption spectrum and thus, green, red and near-infrared lasers have been utilized for this indication.

Table 4.

Pigmented lesions amenable to laser treatment

LentiginesNevus of Ota
EphelidesNevi-Acquired and Congenital
Nevus of Ito(Controversial)

Green light lasers used for pigment lesion removal include the 510 nm FLPDL with a 300 ns pulse duration and the frequency-doubled Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with a 5-10 ns pulse duration. The relatively short green light wavelength does not penetrate the dermis deeply and thus, these lasers are effective only for the treatment of epidermal pigmented lesions such as lentigines 42. In addition, green light is also highly absorbed by HbO2 and therefore, purpura is often noted after treatment.

Red light is well absorbed by melanin and penetrates up to 1 mm into human skin. In addition, red light is not absorbed by HbO2 so there is no post-treatment purpura. Therefore, Q-switched ruby and alexandrite lasers are generally considered the treatment of choice for dermal as well as epidermal melanoses.

Finally, the Q-switched Nd.YAG laser has been used for the treatment of pigmented lesions. Because of the decreased melanin absorption at this wavelength, this laser is most advantageous for treatment of patients with darker skin types who are at increased risk of adverse effects as a result of high non-specific epidermal melanin light absorption and subsequent injury. The ability of this laser to penetrate 4-6 mm into human skin makes it effective for treatment of dermal melanoses such as nevi of Ito and Ota.

Some pigmented dermatoses are more amenable to laser therapy than others. Nevus spilus, café-au-lait macules, and Becker’s nevi often recur even after clinical resolution. Recurrences may result because lasers damage the melanosomes and not the pigment producing melanocytes 42. Treatment of melasma generally yields poor results 43 possibly because of a multi-factorial etiology involving genetics, hormonal influence and sun induction. Post-inflammatory43 and infra-orbital hyperpigmentation44 have also been treated utilizing the Q-switched ruby laser and in some cases improvement has been noted; however, results were variable. For any pigmented lesion, it may be difficult to predict which laser will be most effective and test spots are often useful.

The treatment of nevi is an issue currently generating significant interest. Controversy arises because the effect of lasers on melanocytes, cells with malignant potential, is undefined. Although lasers have been used for years to treat pigmented lesions such as Nevus of Ota, there have been no reports of malignant transformation. This is encouraging; however, the potential risk of litigation in the United States has made clinicians reluctant to treat nevi. Recently, Rosenbach et al. utilized the Q-switched alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers for the treatment of flat, clinically benign, acquired nevi 45. Significant clinical lightening was achieved after three treatments accompanied by a histologic decrease in the number of epidermal and dermal melanocytes. Since this report, some physicians are offering laser treatment of similar lesions.

The treatment of congenital nevi has been particularly thought provoking because these lesions are believed to have an increased malignant potential. The Q-switched ruby and Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers have been used to treat small and medium sized congenital nevi with some success 46,47. Utilizing the Q-switched ruby laser, Waldorf et al. 48 achieved an average improvement of 76% clearance after eight treatment sessions. Five patients achieved 90% clearance after additional treatment sessions. However, at least partial repigmentation was noted in nearly all lesions after therapy discontinuation. Better results have been reported from Japan using the long-pulsed (300-1000 μs) ruby laser 49. Significant reduction was achieved in the nevi of three patients after four treatments with minimal or no recurrence 18-39 months post-therapy.

We reported the complete clinical resolution of a medium sized congenital nevus using the Q-switched ruby laser 50 The lesion was cosmetically disfiguring and its size precluded surgical excision. No recurrence has been noted in six years since the final treatment. The lack of lesion recurrence in this case was likely secondary to the relatively superficial nature of the dermal melanocytes.

At this time, lasers should be considered for the treatment of congenital nevi that are difficult or impossible to excise and located on highly visible areas where they are likely to cause significant cosmetic morbidity. However, the patient and/or family members must be carefully informed of the potential risks and the need for lifelong surveillance of the lesional area.

5.

LASER HAIR REMOVAL

In 1995, the FDA approved the first laser system designed for long-term hair removal based on the principles of selective photothermolysis 51. Since that time, a multitude of lasers and light sources have been developed for this indication (Table 5).

Table 5.

Lasers available for hair removal

Product Name/ManufacturerLaser TypeWavelengths (nm)Special Features
RubyStar® Aesculap-MeditecLong-Pulsed Ruby694Cooling System
Epilaser® CoherentLong-Pulsed Ruby694Sapphire-tipped cooling hand-piece
EpiTouch Ruby® ESC/SharplanLong-Pulsed Ruby694Cooling gel
GentleLase® CandelaLong-Pulsed Alexandrite755Dynamic Cooling Device
Apogee LPIR® CynosureLong-Pulsed Alexandrite755Cooling gel
EpiTouch Alex® ESC/SharplanLong-Pulsed Alexandrite755Cooling gel
LightSheer® CoherentLong-Pulsed Diode800ChillTip hand-piece
Epistar® NidekLong-Pulsed Diode800 
Medlite IV® Continuum BiomedicalQ-switched Nd:YAG1064/532 
SoftLight® ThermolaseQ-switched Nd:YAG1064Utilizes carbon suspension; scanner
Orion® LaserscopeLong-Pulsed Nd:YAG1064Contact cooling
Vasculight® ESC/SharplanLong-Pulsed Nd:YAG1064Contact cooling
VeinLase® HGMLong-Pulsed Nd:YAG1064 
Epilight® ESC/SharplanPulsed Light550-12008x35mm or 10x45 mm hand-piece; Cooling gel

The target chromophore for laser hair removal is melanin and thus, the ideal candidate is a patient with light skin and dark hair. The follicular structure responsible for regeneration has not been identified and current systems target the entire follicle 52. This requires the use of long pulse widths, on the order of milliseconds, and high fluences capable of heating a large volume of tissue 52 Large spot sizes are also beneficial as they penetrate deeper into the dermis and result in more uniform heating.

Despite the considerable interest in this area, none of the currently available systems can achieve consistent, complete, and permanent hair removal. For approval, the FDA requires demonstration of only a 30% decrease in hair growth 3 months after a single treatment 52. Obviously, this definition is not equivalent to permanent hair removal as the duration of telogen may exceed three months. In an effort to set a more meaningful standard for successful treatment, Dierickx et al. defined “permanent hair removal” as a significant reduction in the number of terminal hairs for a period longer than the follicle growth cycle at the relevant body site 53. Thus far, some patients have experienced “permanent hair removal” by this definition using a long-pulsed ruby laser 53, a diode laser 54, or the intense pulsed light source 55. The majority of patients undergoing laser hair removal report only a significant delay (generally 3-9 months) in hair re-growth 56.

Permanent hair removal is difficult to achieve for a variety of reasons. Hair follicles are capable of regeneration, although as previously noted, the pleuripotential cell source is unknown. Currently, the bulge and the dermal papilla are considered the most likely candidates. Further, the size and melanin content of follicles vary with anatomic location and growth cycle phase (anagen, catagen or telogen) making them more difficult to target. Finally, the removal of red, blonde, white or gray hair is difficult because the targeted chromophore, melanin, is altered in composition and quantity and as a result, light absorption is diminished 57.

Lasers can generally achieve longer delays in hair re-growth than traditional methods such as shaving, tweezing, waxing and chemical depilation58. In addition, lasers are generally faster and less painful than electrosurgical depilation and the incidence of abverse effects is low. In a recent study, Nanni and Alster 59 reviewed the charts of 900 patients who underwent laser hair removal. Most if not all patients experienced transient erythema and peri-follicular edema which generally resolved within 4 hours. Folliculitis and skin dyspigmentation were the next most common side effects but again, were temporary. Long term sequelae including scarring, did not occur in this study.

Patients with dark skin types who have a higher concentration of epidermal melanin, are at greatest risk for epidermal damage and skin dyspigmentation during hair removal. The use of longer wavelengths and pulse widths is useful in these patients but the best results have been achieved with laser systems which have implemented spatially selective photocoagulation utilizing cooling gel, sapphire tip contact cooling or CSC.

Futher research is required in this area of laser dermatology to make hair removal more complete, longer lasting and consistent in patients with all skin and hair types. Hair removal utilizing aminolevulinic acid and photodynamic therapy has been reported 60 and may offer an improved option in the future.

6.

LASER SKIN RESURFACING (LSR)

Forcenturies, patients have sought treatment for rhytides and photodamage. Previous therapeutic options included dermabrasion, chemical peels, and topical medications including tretinoin and glycolic acids. During the last decade, infrared lasers introduced for this indication, have generated a great deal of attention from the media, patients and physicians. These lasers are capable of precise and complete ablation of human skin and offer several advantages over other treatment modalities.

The carbon dioxide (CO2) laser has a wavelength of 10,600 nm which is highly absorbed by tissue water. Ninety-eight percent of the incident energy is absorbed within the most superficial 0.01 mm. The unique characteristics of the CO2 laser make it a versatile surgical tool which can be used either for surgical incisions or volume ablation by vaporization of skin as utilized for the treatment of rhytides known as laser skin resurfacing (LSR). Rapid, localized heating results in tissue ablation with boiling and vaporization of intracellular water into a plume containing steam and charred tissue. While the removal of photodamaged skin is the most common indication for this procedure, LSR can also be utilized for treatment of a variety of skin lesions including acne scars (Table 6).

Table 6.

Ablative laser applications

Rhytid Ablation - Laser ResurfacingAdenoma Sebaceum
Acne ScarsAngiokeratomas
Epidermal NevusAngiolymphoid Hyperplasia
Bowen’s DiseasePearly Penile Papules
Actinic KeratosesVenous Lakes
Actinic CheilitisLichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus
Oral Florid PapillomatosisZoon’s Balanitis
Seborrheic KeratosesHailey-Hailey Disease
SyringomasGranuloma Faciale
TrichoepitheliomasNeurofibromas
TrichilemmomasMyxoid Cysts
XanthelasmaRhinophyma
Apocrine HidrocystomaMycosis Fungoides
Verruca 

The first devices used for LSR were CO2 lasers that delivered light in a continuous wave mode which resulted in non-specific thermal damage and scarring. Ablative lasers capable of high peak powers with short pulse durations were required to achieve more precise tissue removal. Two methods were utilized to obtain this goal. First, lasers were developed that achieve high peak powers in discrete millisecond pulses. This reduced pulse duration results in more superficial tissue vaporization which limits the zone of thermal injury. The most recent models have pulse durations less than 100 μs resulting in more rapid healing61 and less erythema 62. The second method combined a continuous mode low power CO2 laser with a computerized scanner. Each individual skin site is exposed to the laser energy for a millisecond or less by rapidly scanning the beam over a geometric pattern. High powers can be obtained by focusing the laser beam onto a small spot size.

The computerized pattern generator® (CPG) developed by Coherent (Palo Alto, CA) is an automatic scanning device which is integrated into the laser to provide a precise, rapid, non-overlapping series of pulses in a pre-designated pattern. The CPG allows the clinician to vary the pattern, size and density of pulses and increases the speed and uniformity of CO2 resurfacing.

More recently, Erbium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) lasers have been introduced. A pulsed flashlamp excites a YAG crystal doped with erbium to emit a wavelength of 2940 nm which is absorbed by water sixteen times more efficiently than the CO2 laser wavelength. The Q-switched mode can be utilized to achieve pulse durations with nanosecond intervals. These two factors combine to produce more superficial ablation.

Actinically damaged skin is characterized by epidermal atrophy and irregularity 62. Keratinocytes vary in shape and size and are atypical. Melanocyte number and size are increased and melanin is unevenly distributed to the keratinocytes resulting in irregular skin pigmentation. In the dermis, glycosaminoglycans are increased replacing destroyed collagen. Elastic fibers are abundant, thickened and tortuous.

After CO2 LSR, the following histologic improvements are noted 63. Epidermal atrophy and atypia are eliminated and replaced by normal epithelium with uniform keratinocytes. Melanocyte hypertrophy is eliminated and melanin is distributed evenly to the keratinocytes. In the dermis, glycosaminoglycans are decreased and replaced by new collagen and elastic fibers.

The mechanism of rhytid improvement post LSR has been debated and is likely multi-factorial 64. Some skin irregularities are removed by direct tissue ablation 63. Tissue shrinkage is another important factor and can be observed as the treatment is performed. This phenomenon is thought to be secondary to tissue dehydration and contraction of denatured collagen 65. In addition, an increase in smooth muscle actin filaments has been reported post LSR 66,67. During wound healing, contraction of these filaments may provide a scaffold for collagen deposition and remodeling which occur as laser induced thermal damage is repaired 64. Post-operative healing leaves a smooth skin surface with the above described histologic improvements.

The outcome of LSR is dependent on the total depth of dermal injury which includes the extent of ablation plus residual thermal damage. The CO2 laser heats the skin surface in a self-limited and controlled manner 68. Thirty to seventy-five micrometers of tissue are removed per pass until a plateau is reached at a depth of 200-250 μm 69. The depth of residual thermal damage is dependent on the fluence and laser pulse duration and can reach a maximum of 150-180 μm 65,70. Blood vessels are coagulated during treatment and therefore, bleeding is generally minimal. At standard fluences, Er:YAG lasers are almost purely ablative, removing 10-40 μm of tissue per pass while the zone of thermal necrosis is limited to 50 μm or less 71. As a result, bleeding is common and may impair the procedure. Tissue ablation depth does not plateau and correlates linearly with the number of laser passes 72.

Clinically, patients can expect 50% or greater improvement in wrinkle severity after CO2 LSR 73. Rhytides in areas of strong muscle activity such as the glabellar area respond least well whereas peri-orbital and -oral responses are better and similar 14.

Khatri et al. 75 demonstrated that Er:YAG lasers at 5-8 J/cm2 produce more superficial ablation, result in faster healing and are less effective at rhytid improvement when compared to CO2 laser treatment of an equivalent number of passes performed at a similar pulse fluence. If the number of Er:YAG laser passes is increased to 5 or more, ablation depth, speed of healing and rhytid improvement are equivalent to CO2 laser resurfacing.

A variety of adverse effects have been reported with LSR. The most common is skin dyspigmentation. The incidence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation is increased in patients with darker skin types. Studies have reported hyperpigmentation in up to 80% of skin type IV individuals with LSR of the peri-oral area 76. This pigment change is noted 1-3 months after the procedure and generally resolves by postoperative month 3-4 with the use of bleaching agents and sun avoidance.

Delayed hypopigmentation may occur 3-10 months after resurfacing. The skin often appears normal after the resolution of erythema but before the onset of hypopigmentation. This adverse effect may occur in all skin types and the risk may be increased in those with more extensive photodamage77.

Other adverse effects include infectious and allergic complications such as impetigo, candidiasis, Kaposi’s varicelliform eruption and allergic contact dermatitis. The incidence of these events has decreased with the use of improved pre- and postoperative care78. Milia and acneiform lesions occur three to six weeks after LSR in up to 83% of patients but are easily treated with tretinoin or extraction77.

Er:YAG LSR may be associated with a decreased incidence of adverse effects75. Thus, some physicians perform 1-2 passes of the CO2 laser followed by 1-2 passes of the Er:YAG 79 in an effort to achieve maximum rhytid removal while decreasing the incidence of side effects. Cynosure, Inc. (Chelmsford, MA) and Sciton (Palo Alto, CA) have developed variable pulse duration Er:YAG lasers with a similar goal. It remains unclear whether these modifications are beneficial.

While ablative lasers can achieve good treatment results, removal of the epidermis results in an open wound which requires considerable post-operative wound care and puts the patient at risk for the complications described above. In an effort to improve rhytides while decreasing or eliminating the incidence of these adverse effects, attempts at nonablative skin resurfacing have been made. Laser Aesthetics (Auburn, CA) developed a 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser which in combination with CSC, is capable of stimulating tissue fibroblasts 80 without epidermal injury. In a multi-center study, 35 adults with peri-orbital rhytides were treated with 3 nonablative laser treatments performed sequentially at intervals of 2 weeks. Small but statistically significant improvements were noted in mild, moderate and severe rhytid groups twelve weeks after the final treatment. Only the severe rhytid group showed statistically significant improvement 24 weeks after the last treatment. Adverse effects were limited to transient hyperpigmentation (5.6%) and a low incidence (2.8%) of barely perceptible pin-point pitted scars. This study demonstrated that CSC is a safe and promising method for protecting the epidermis during nonablative laser treatment of facial rhytides and can be used to avoid much of the morbidity associated with other resurfacing modalities. Additional work should increase the efficacy of this and other nonablative resurfacing systems which may be utilized more commonly in the future.

7.

ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED

The role of the laser in clinical dermatology has significantly progressed during the last forty years and a wide variety of conditions and lesions can be successfully treated. However, as noted throughout this review, problems remain to be solved in order to achieve improved therapeutic outcomes without adverse effects.

First, for several clinical indications, the exact mechanism of the laser’s effect is unclear. For tattoo and pigmented lesion removal, hair removal and LSR, mechanistic proposals have been made but not definitively proven. This incomplete understanding of laser-tissue interactions results in sub-optimal treatment. Patients seeking removal of tattoos or dermal melanoses often require ten or more treatments and even then, complete removal is often not achieved. Nevi, when treated, can be lightened or diminished in size but complete clinical removal is rare. The mode of action of laser hair removal is even less well defined as the follicular source of regeneration and thus, the optimal target, remains unknown. As a result, only hair reduction, not true elimination, is generally achieved, and even this is often temporary. The precise mechanism of rhytid improvement associated with traditional resurfacing methods is undefined and thus, has been difficult to replicate with nonablative methods.

Second, the effects of lasers on sub-cellular structures including DNA have not been elucidated. As a result, safety issues have been raised in regards to the laser treatment of nevi. While lasers can clearly remove or at least lighten congenital nevi, questions remain including whether laser treatment will decrease (by lessening the melanocytic load) or increase the risk of malignant transformation.

Third, the size and depth of the target chromophore and the epidermal melanin concentration are important variables affecting laser treatment. Current work is exploring methods to image and determine the depth and size of epidermal and dermal structures on an individual patient basis. This information combined with measurement of the patient’s epidermal melanin concentration could be used to tailor laser wavelength, pulse duration and cooling parameters with the expectation of improving therapeutic outcome. These diagnostic techniques need to be improved to provide consistent accurate measurements and incorporated into widely available laser systems programmed to utilize the data.

Finally, spatially selective photocoagulation needs to be optimized. CSC is the most efficient method. Several fundamental questions regarding the thermodynamics of cryogen on the skin surface need to be addressed. Variables including cryogen selection, size and velocity of the cryogen droplets, delivery distance between the nozzle and skin surface and orientation of the cryogen spray relative to the skin surface, need to be further investigated and optimized in order to achieve improved treatment efficacy and decrease the incidence of side effects which occur as a result of epidermal injury. For conductive cooling, (i.e. gel or sapphire plates) issues regarding the timed application and removal of the devices need to be addressed and optimized.

8.

CONCLUSION

The unique properties of lasers create an enormous potential for specific therapy of selective dermatoses. The most beneficial and appropriate use requires a thorough understanding of light and tissue interactions as well as laser properties. Future advances will require the efforts of physicians, engineers, chemists and physicists to match optimally the laser and treatment procedure to the targeted lesion.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This project was supported by research grant AR43419 from the Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases at the National Institutes of Health (Dr. Nelson). Institutional support from the Department of Energy and the Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic endowment at the University of California, Irvine is gratefully acknowledged.

REFERENCES

1. 

R.R. Anderson and J.A. Parrish, “Selective photothermolysis. precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation,” Science 220, pp. 524–529, 1983.Google Scholar

2. 

B.A. Gilchrest, S. Rosen, and J.M. Noe, “Chilling port wine stains improves the response to argon laser therapy,” Plast. Reconst. Surg. 69, pp. 278–283, 1982.Google Scholar

3. 

U. Hohenleutner, T. Walther, M. Wenig, W. B’aumler and M. Landthaler, “Leg telangiectasia treatment with a 1.5 ms pulsed dye laser, ice cube cooling of the skin and 595 vs. 600 nm: preliminary results,” Lasers Surg. Med. 23, pp. 72–78, 1998.Google Scholar

4. 

G.B. Altshuler, H.H. Zenzie, A.V. Erofeev, M.Z. Smirnov, R.R. Anderson and C. Dierickx, “Contact cooling of the skin,” Phys. Med. Biol. 44, pp. 1003–23, 1999.Google Scholar

5. 

J.S. Nelson, T.E. Milner, B. Anvari, L.T. Norvang, N.H. Tran, B.S. Tanenbaum, and L.O. Svaasand, “Dynamic cooling of the epidermis during laser port wine stain therapy,” Lasers Surg. Med. 6S, p. 48, 1994.Google Scholar

6. 

J.S. Nelson, T.E. Milner, B. Anvari, B.S. Tanenbaum, S. Kimel, L.O. Svaasand, and S.L. Jacques, “Dynamic epidermal cooling during pulsed laser treatment of port-wine stain. A new methodology with preliminary clinical evaluation,” Arch. Dermatol. 131, pp. 695–700, 1995.Google Scholar

7. 

R.R. Anderson and J. A. Parrish, “The optics of human skin,” J. Invest. Derm. 77, pp.13–19, 1981.Google Scholar

8. 

M.J.C. Van Gemert, A.J. Welch and A.P. Amin. “Is there an optimal laser treatment for port wine stains?,” Lasers Surg. Med. 6, pp. 76–83, 1986.Google Scholar

9. 

C.C. Dierickx, J.M. Casparian, V. Venugopala, W.A. Farinelli and R.R. Anderson, “Thermal relaxation of port-wine stain vessels probed in vivo, the need for 1-10 millisecond laser pulse treatment,” J. Invest. Derm. 105, pp. 709–714, 1995.Google Scholar

10. 

J. A. Dixon, S. Huether and R. Rotering, “Hypertrophic scarring in argon laser treatment of port-wine stains,” Plast. and Reconst. Surg. 73, pp. 771–779, 1984.Google Scholar

11. 

L. Silver “Argon laser photocoagulation of port wine stain hemangiomas,” Lasers Surg. Med. 6, pp. 24–28, 1986.Google Scholar

12. 

O.T. Tan, O. Morrison and A.K. Kurban, “585 nm for the treatment of port wine stains,” Plast. Reconst. Surg. 86, pp. 1112–1117, 1990.Google Scholar

13. 

R. Ashinoff and R.G. Geronemus, “Flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser for port-wine stains in infancy: earlier versus later treatment,” J. Am. Acad. Derm. 24, pp. 467–472, 1991.Google Scholar

14. 

U. Wlotzke, U. Hohenleutner, T.A. Abd-El-Raheem, W. Baumler and M. Landthaler, “Side-effects and complications of flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser therapy of port-wine stains,” Br. J. Dermatol. 134, pp. 475–480, 1996.Google Scholar

15. 

T. S. Alster and F. Wilson, “Treatment of port-wine stains with the flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser: extended clinical experience in children and adults,” Ann. Plast. Surg. 32, pp. 478–484, 1994.Google Scholar

16. 

M.P. Goldman, R.E. Fitzpatrick and J. Ruiz-Esparza, “Treatment of port-wine stains (capillary malformation) with the flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser,” J. Pediatrics 122, pp. 71–77, 1993.Google Scholar

17. 

D.C. Seukeran, P. Collins, and R.A. Sheehan-Dare, “Adverse reactions following pulsed tunable dye laser treatment of port wine stains in 701 patients,” Br. J. Dermatol. 136, pp. 725–729, 1997.Google Scholar

18. 

J.S. Nelson and J. Applebaum, “Clinical management of port-wine stain in infants and young children using the flashlamp-pulsed dye laser,” Clin. Pediatr. 29, pp. 503–508, 1990.Google Scholar

19. 

J.C. Chang and J.S. Nelson, “Cryogen spray cooling and higher fluence pulsed dye laser treatment improve port wine stain clearance while minimizing epidermal damage,” Dermatol. Surg. 25, pp. 767–772, 1999.Google Scholar

20. 

J.S. Nelson, T.E. Milner, B. Anvari, B.S. Tanenbaum, L.O. Svaasand and S. Kimel, “Dynamic epidermal cooling in conjunction with laser-induced photothermolysis of port wine stain blood vessels,” Lasers Surg. Med. 19, pp. 224–229, 1996.Google Scholar

21. 

H.A. Waldorf, T. S. Alster, K. McMillan, A.N. Kauvar, R.G. Geronemus and J.S. Nelson, “Effect of dynamic cooling of 585-nm pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stain birthmarks,” Dermatol. Surg. 23, pp. 657–662, 1997.Google Scholar

22. 

E.J. Fiskerstrand, K. Ruggem, L. T. Norvan, and L.O. Svaasand, “Clinical effects of dynamic cooling during pulsed laser treatment of port wine stains,” Skinlaser Today 7, pp. 25–37, 1998.Google Scholar

23. 

R.M. Adrian, P. Graf, C. Grief and G. Burg, “Treatment of vascular lesions using the VersaPulse® variable pulse width frequency doubled neodymium: YAG laser,” Dermatol. 197, pp. 158–161, 1998.Google Scholar

24. 

T.B. West and T.S. Alster, “Comparison of the long-pulse dye (590-595nm) and KTP (532 nm) lasers in the treatment of facial and leg telangiectasias,” Dermatol. Surg. 24, pp. 221–226, 1998.Google Scholar

25. 

R.M. Adrian and E.A. Tanghetti, “Long pulse 532-nm laser treatment of facial telangiectasia,” Dermatol. Surg. 24, pp. 71–73, 1998.Google Scholar

26. 

R. Dummer, M. P. Goldman, M. A. Weiss and R. A. Weiss, “Treatment of adult port-wine stains using intense pulsed light therapy (PhotoDerm VL): brief initial clinical report,” Dermatol. Surg. 23, pp. 594–601, 1997.Google Scholar

27. 

R. Raulin, C.A. Schroeter, R. A. Weiss, M. Keiner and S. Werner, “Treatment of port-wine stains with a noncoherent pulsed light source,” Arch. Dermatol. 135, pp. 679–683, 1999.Google Scholar

28. 

R. A. Massey and B.A. Katz, “Successful treatment of spider leg veins with a high-energy, long-pulse, frequency-doubled neodymium: YAG laser (HELP-G),” Dermatol. Surg. 25, pp. 677–80, 1999.Google Scholar

29. 

D.B. Apfelberg, M.R. Maser and H. Lash, “Argon laser treatment of decorative tattoos,” Br. J. Plast. Surg. 32, pp. 141–144, 1979.Google Scholar

30. 

P.L. Bailin, J.L. Ratz, and H.L. Levine, “Removal of tattoos by CO2 laser,” J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 6, pp. 997–1001, 1980.Google Scholar

31. 

D.B. Apflberg, M.R. Maser, H. Lash, D.N. White, and J.T. Flores, “Comparison of argon and carbon dioxide laser treatment of decorative tattoos: a preliminary report,” Ann. Plast. Surg. 14, pp. 7–16, 1985.Google Scholar

32. 

K.M. Cesario-Kelly and J.S. Nelson, “Invited review: Q-switched laser treatment of tattoos,” Lasers Med. Sci. 12, pp. 89–98, 1997.Google Scholar

33. 

C.R. Taylor, R. R. Anderson, R.W. Gange, N. A. Michaud and T.J. Flotte, “Light and electron microscopic analysis of tattoos treated by Q-switched ruby laser,” J. Invest. Dermatol. 97, pp. 131–136, 1991.Google Scholar

34. 

R. R. Anderson, R.G. Geronemus, S.L. Kilmer, W. Farinelli and R.E. Fitzpatrick, “Cosmetic tattoo ink darkening: a complication of Q-switched and pulsed-laser treatment,” Arch. Dermatol. 129, pp. 1010–1014, 1993.Google Scholar

35. 

T.S. Alster, “Q-switched alexandrite laser treatment (755 nm) of professional and amateur tattoos,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 33, pp. 69–73, 1995.Google Scholar

36. 

R. Ashinoff, V.J. Levine and N.A. Soter, “Allergic reactions to tattoo pigment after laser treatment,” Dermatol. Surg. 34, pp. 542–545, 1995.Google Scholar

37. 

R.M. Herd, M.B. Alora, B. Smoller, K.A. Arndt and J.S. Dover, “A clinical and histologic prospective controlled comparative study of the picosecond titanium:sapphire (795 nm) laser versus the Q-switched alexandrite (755 nm) laser for removing tattoo pigment,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 40, pp. 603–606, 1999.Google Scholar

38. 

E.V. Ross, G. S. Naseef, C.P. Lin, M. Kelly, N. Michaud, T.J. Flotte, J. Raythen and R. R. Anderson, “Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium. YAG lasers,” Arch. Dermatol. 134, pp. 167–171, 1998.Google Scholar

39. 

M. Hodersdal, N. Bech-Thomsen, and H.C. Wulf, “Skin reflectance - guided laser selections for treatment of decorative tattoos,” Arch. Dermatol. 132, pp. 403–407, 1996.Google Scholar

40. 

A. Gulshan, R.R. Anderson, K.G. Mandel, M. Ottesen and A.R. Oseroff, “Irradiation of pigmented melanoma cells with high intensity pulsed radiation generates acoustic waves and kills cells,” Lasers. Surg Med. 10, pp. 52–59, 1990.Google Scholar

41. 

R. R. Anderson, R.J. Margolis, S. Watenabe, T. Flotte, G.J. Hruza and J.S. Dover, “Selective photothermolysis of cutaneous pigmentation by Q-switched Nd.YAG laser pulses at 1064, 532, and 355 nm,” J. Inves. Derm. 93, pp. 28–32, 1989.Google Scholar

42. 

D.J. Goldberg, “Congenital and acquired pigmented lesions: To treat or not to treat with lasers?” in Syllabus for Controversies and Conversations in Cutaneous Laser Surgery 1999.Google Scholar

43. 

C.R. Taylor and R. R. Anderson, “Ineffective treatment of refractory melasma and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation by Q-switched ruby laser,” J. Dermatol Surg. Oncol. 29, pp. 592–597, 1994.Google Scholar

44. 

N.J. Lowe, J.M. Wieder, N. Shorr, C. Boxrud, D. Saucer, and M. Chalet, “Infraorbital pigmented skin preliminary observations of laser therapy,” Dermatol. Surg. 21, pp. 767–770, 1995.Google Scholar

45. 

A. Rosenbach, C.M. Williams, and T. S. Alster, “Comparison of the Q-switched alexandrite (755 nm) and Q-switched Nd:YAG (1064 nm) lasers in the treatment of benign melanocytic nevi,” Dermatol. Surg. 23, pp. 239–245, 1997.Google Scholar

46. 

D.J. Goldberg and T. Stampien, “Q-switched ruby laser treatment of congenital nevi,” Arch. Dermatol. 131, pp. 621–623, 1995.Google Scholar

47. 

J.M. Grevelink, R.L. van Leeuwen, R. R. Anderson, and R. Byers, “Clinical and histological responses of congenital melanocytic nevi after single treatment with Q-switched lasers,” Arch. Dermatol. 133, pp. 349–353, 1997.Google Scholar

48. 

H.A. Waldrof, A.N. Kauvar, and R.G. Geronemus, “Treatment of small and medium congenital nevi with the Q-switched ruby laser,” Arch. Dermatol. 132, pp. 301–304, 1996.Google Scholar

49. 

S. Ueda and S. Imayama, “Normal-mode ruby laser for treating congenital nevi,” Arch. Dermatol. 133, pp. 355–359, 1997.Google Scholar

50. 

J.S. Nelson and K.M. Kelly, “Q-switched ruby laser treatment of a congenital melanocytic nevi,” Dermatol. Surg. 25, pp. 274–276, 1999.Google Scholar

51. 

T.S. Alster, “The evolution of laser-assisted hair removal,” Cosmetic Dermatol. August, pp. 15–18, 1999.Google Scholar

52. 

R.J. Ort and R. R. Anderson, “Optical hair removal,” Sem. Cut. Med. Surg. 18, pp. 149–158, 1999.Google Scholar

53. 

C.C. Dierickx, M.C. Grossman, W.A. Farinelli and R.R. Anderson, “Permanent hair removal by normal-mode ruby laser,” Arch. Dermatol. 134, pp. 837–842, 1998.Google Scholar

54. 

“Diode claims permanent hair reduction,” Cosmetic Dermatol. 12, p. 48 1999.Google Scholar

55. 

M.H. Gold, M.W. Bell, T. D. Foster and S. Street, “One-year follow-up using an intense pulsed light source for long-term hair removal,” J. Cut. Laser Therapy 1, pp. 167–171 1999.Google Scholar

56. 

C.A. Nanni and T.S. Alster, “A practical review of laser-assisted hair removal using the Q-switched Nd:YAG, long-pulsed ruby and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers,” Dermatol. Surg. 24, pp. 1399–1405, 1998.Google Scholar

57. 

E.V. Ross, Z. Ladin, M. Kriendel and C. Dierickx, ‘Theoretical considerations in laser hair removal,” Derm. Clinics 17, pp. 333–355, 1999.Google Scholar

58. 

N.L. Marchell and T. S. Alster, “Evaluation of temporary and permanent hair removal methods,” J. Aesth. Dermatol. Cos. Surg. 1, pp. 3–12, 1999.Google Scholar

59. 

C.A. Nanni and T.S. Alster, “Laser-assisted hair removal: Side effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG, long-pulsed ruby, and alexandrite lasers,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 41, pp. 165–171, 1999.Google Scholar

60. 

M. Grossman, J. Wimberly, P. Dwyer, T. Flotte, and R.R. Anderson, “PDT for hirsutism,” Lasers Surg. Med. 7(suppl), p. 44, 1995.Google Scholar

61. 

R.L. Moy, B. Bucalo, M. H. Lee, J. Wieder, M. D. Chalet, A. Ostad, and W. D. Dishell, “Skin resurfacing of facial rhytides and scars with the 90-μs short pulsed CO2 laser,” Dermatol. Surg. 24, pp. 1390–1396, 1998.Google Scholar

62. 

D. Duke, K. Khatri, J.M. Grevelink and R.R. Anderson, “Comparative clinical trial of 2 carbon dioxide resurfacing lasers with varying pulse durations,” Arch. Dermatol. 134, pp. 1240–1246, 1998.Google Scholar

63. 

J.M. Stuzin, T.J. Baker, T.M. Baker, and A.M. Kligman, “Histologic effects of the high-energy pulsed CO2 laser on photoaged facial skin,” Plast.Reconstr. Surg. 99, pp. 2036–2050, 1999.Google Scholar

64. 

D. Ratner, Y. Tse, N. Marchell, M. P. Goldman, R.E. Fitzpatrick and D.J. Fader, “Cutaneous laser resurfacing” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 41, pp. 365–389, 1999.Google Scholar

65. 

E.V. Ross, M.C. Grossman, D. Duke and J.M. Grevelink, “Long-term results after CO2 laser skin resurfacing: A comparison of scanned and pulsed systems,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 37, pp. 709–718, 1997.Google Scholar

66. 

K.J. Smith, H.G. Skelton, J.S. Graham, C.G. Hurst and J. E. Hackley, “Increased smooth muscle actin, factor Xllla, and vimentin-positive cells in the papillary dermis of carbon dioxide laser-debrided porcine skin,” Dermatol. Surg. 23, pp. 891–895, 1997.Google Scholar

67. 

T. S. Alster, “On: Increased smooth muscle actin, factor Xllla, and vimentin-positive cells in the papillary dermis of carbon dioxide laser-debrided porcine skin,” Dermatol. Surg. 25, p. 155, 1998.Google Scholar

68. 

E.V. Ross, J.R. McKinlay and R.R. Anderson, “Why does carbon dioxide resurfacing work?” Arch. Dermatol. 135, pp. 444–454, 1999.Google Scholar

69. 

R.E. Fitzpatrick, S. R. Smith, and S. Sriprachya-anunt, “Depth of vaporization and the effect of pulse stacking with a high-energy, pulsed carbon dioxide laser,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 40, pp. 615–622, 1999.Google Scholar

70. 

E. S. Garner, L. Reinisch, G.P. Stricklin and D.L. Ellis, “In vitro changes in non-facial human skin following CO2 laser resurfacing; a comparison study,” Lasers Surg. Med. 19, pp. 378–387, 1996.Google Scholar

71. 

J.T. Walsh, T.J. Flotte and T.F. Deutsch, “Er: YAG laser ablation of tissue: effect of pulse duration and tissue type on thermal damage,” Lasers Surg. Med. 9 pp. 314–326, 1989.Google Scholar

72. 

Y. Tse, W. Manuskiatti, S. P. Detwiler, R.E. Fitzpatrick and M. P. Goldman, “Tissue effects of the erbium: YAG laser with varying passes, energy, and pulse overlap,” Lasers Surg. Med. 22 (suppl 10), p.70, 1998.Google Scholar

73. 

N.J. Lowe, G. Lask, M. E. Griffin, A. Maxwell, P Lowe, and F. Quilada, “Skin resurfacing with the Ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser,” Dermatol. Surg. 1995, 21: pp. 1025–1029, 1998.Google Scholar

74. 

H.A. Waldorf, A.N. Kauvar, and R.G. Geronemus, “Skin resurfacing of fine to deep rhytides using a char-free carbon dioxide laser in 47 patients,” Dermatol. Surg. 21, pp.940–946, 1995.Google Scholar

75. 

K.A. Khatri, E.V. Ross, J.M. Grevelink, C.M. Magro, and R.R. Anderson, “Comparison of Erbium: YAG and carbon dioxide lasers in resurfacing of facial rhytides,” Arch. Dermatol. 135, pp. 391–397, 1999.Google Scholar

76. 

R.E. Fitzpatrick, M.P. Goldman, N.M. Satur and W. D. Tope, “Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photoaged facial skin,” Arch. Dermatol. 132, pp. 395–402, 1996.Google Scholar

77. 

L.J. Bernstein, A.N. Kauvar, M.C. Grossman, and R.G. Geronemus, “The short-and long-term side effects of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing,” Dermatol. Surg. 23, pp. 519–525, 1997.Google Scholar

78. 

N.J. Lowe, G. Lask, M.E. Griffin, “Laser skin resurfacing: Pre- and post-treatment guidelines,” Dermatol. Surg. 21, pp. 1017–1019, 1995.Google Scholar

79. 

S.S. Collawn, “Combination therapy: utilization of CO2 and Erbium:YAG lasers for skin resurfacing,” Ann. Plast. Surg. 42, pp. 21–26, 1999.Google Scholar

80. 

K.M. Kelly, J.S. Nelson, G.P. Lask, R.G. Geronemus, and L.J. Bernstein, “Cryogen spray cooling in combination with nonablative laser treatment of facial rhytides,” Arch. Dermatol. 135, pp. 691–694, 1999.Google Scholar

© (2000) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
K. M. Kelly, J. Stuart Nelson, "Overview of lasers in dermatology", Proc. SPIE 10297, Matching the Energy Source to the Clinical Need: A Critical Review, 1029702 (24 January 2000); doi: 10.1117/12.375211; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.375211
PROCEEDINGS
21 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top