12 September 2017 Fabrication of coronagraph masks and laboratory scale star-shade masks: characteristics, defects, and performance
Author Affiliations +
NASA WFIRST mission has planned to include a coronagraph instrument to find and characterize exoplanets. Masks are needed to suppress the host star light to better than 10-8 – 10-9 level contrast over a broad bandwidth to enable the coronagraph mission objectives. Such masks for high contrast coronagraphic imaging require various fabrication technologies to meet a wide range of specifications, including precise shapes, micron scale island features, ultra-low reflectivity regions, uniformity, wave front quality, etc. We present the technologies employed at JPL to produce these pupil plane and image plane coronagraph masks, and lab-scale external occulter masks, highlighting accomplishments from the high contrast imaging testbed (HCIT) at JPL and from the high contrast imaging lab (HCIL) at Princeton University. Inherent systematic and random errors in fabrication and their impact on coronagraph performance are discussed with model predictions and measurements.
Conference Presentation
© (2017) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Kunjithapatham Balasubramanian, Kunjithapatham Balasubramanian, A. J. Eldorado Riggs, A. J. Eldorado Riggs, Eric Cady, Eric Cady, Victor White, Victor White, Karl Yee, Karl Yee, Daniel Wilson, Daniel Wilson, Pierre Echternach, Pierre Echternach, Richard Muller, Richard Muller, Camilo Mejia Prada, Camilo Mejia Prada, Byoung-Joon Seo, Byoung-Joon Seo, Fang Shi, Fang Shi, Daniel Ryan, Daniel Ryan, Santos Fregoso, Santos Fregoso, Jacob Metzman, Jacob Metzman, Robert Casey Wilson, Robert Casey Wilson, } "Fabrication of coronagraph masks and laboratory scale star-shade masks: characteristics, defects, and performance", Proc. SPIE 10400, Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets VIII, 104000C (12 September 2017); doi: 10.1117/12.2274059; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2274059


Back to Top