The magneto-optical Kerr effect refers to the phenomenon that the vibrating surface of reflected wave rotates while the incidence of the linearly polarized plane wave (LPPW) on the magnetized material, which is discovered in 1876 by J·Kerr. Magneto-optical Kerr effect is widely used in many fields, like magnetic ordering, magnetic anisotropy, coupling between the layers of multilayer film, and the research of the magnetic ultrathin membrane phase transition behavior[2-5]. Magneto-optical Kerr effect is an important experimental methods of magnetism, and is also an effective way to measure the properties of materials, especially the physical properties of film materials[6-7]. Besides, magneto-optical information storage is the technological innovation developed in recent years, and it is a hot research field of developing practical magnetic medium material with much more superior performance for information storage. Magneto-optical Kerr effect has been applied to the high density of computer memory, e.g., there is the recordable compact disc with the storage of hundreds to thousands of megabytes in single piece.
At present, the magneto-optical Kerr effect is heavily studied in experimental measurements[8-11]. The theoretical explanation on this effect is mainly based on complex quantum theories[12-15], while how to employ the classical electromagnetic theory on this effect is rarely discussed. In this paper, with Maxwell’s electromagnetic equations, the boundary conditions and medium constitutive relation of ideal ferromagnetic medium, we analyze the LPPW reflection behavior on the surface of the ideal ferromagnetic medium, which can naturally gives the poloidal, longitudinal and transverse magneto-optic Kerr effect, besides the Kerr rotation angle change law with the incident angle and magnetic-field strength in detail. The studies can provide crucial information for the applications of the magnetooptical Kerr effect in many fields.
PRIMARY ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY AND IDEAL FERROMAGNETIC MEDIUM MODEL
The effect of the medium on electromagnetic waves is generally described by Maxwell’s differential equations:
and the corresponding boundary conditions:
Note here supposed that no free charges and free currents at the interface between two kinds of mediums. Here the ideal ferromagnetic medium referred to in this paper has the following electromagnetic properties:
where is a constant vector. The equation (1) is the approximation model of magnetic hysteresis loop of ferromagnetic medium. From (1) we can see that, an ideal ferromagnetic medium can be taken as a mixture of the linear magnetic medium and permanent magnet. Therefore, when electromagnetic behaviors are relevant to the ideal ferromagnetic medium, the corresponding analysis can be divided into two steps: at first, the studies are made according to the linear magnetic medium of , and then the influence and modification of the permanent magnet is considered carefully. In the next section, employing the above ideas, we shall deduce the magneto-optical Kerr effects and rotation angles when LPPW is incident to the surface of ideal ferromagnetic medium, in which the can be along one of the poloidal, longitudinal and transverse directions.
MAGNETO-OPTICAL KERR EFFECTS ON IDEAL FERROMAGNETIC MEDIUM SURFACE
Figure 1 shows the coordinate system employed in the following derivations. The XOY plane is the interface of two semi-infinite mediums, where 2 is the ideal ferromagnetic medium and 1 is the homogeneous linear medium. The normal direction of the interface is consistent with the Z axis. The incidence of LPPW is from 1 to 2, so the incident plane is XOZ plane. Here the Kerr rotation angle β is defined as the included angle between the vector direction of total magnetic field in reflected wave and the incident plane.
In S-wave case, the electric/magnetic field vibration direction of incident wave is perpendicular/parallel to the incident plane. To obtain the magnetic field amplitude ratios of reflected and refracted waves to incident wave, one needs two boundary conditions: tangential components of electric fields are continuous, and tangential components of magnetic fields are continuous on the interface, too. As mentioned in Section 2, these boundary conditions correspond respectively to the following formulas (2)-(3):
where E/H is the electric/magnetic field amplitude of the incident wave, and E/H′ (E″/H)″is the electric/magnetic field amplitude of reflected (refracted) wave when supposed 2 is linear medium, so according to TEM wave properties we have
In the above process of derivation, only the linear part of electromagnetic characteristic law of ideal ferromagnetic medium in Eq. (1), i.e., the medium-2 is supposed just as linear medium. However, the fundamental reason of ideal ferromagnetic medium different from linear medium is that the term of exists in its electromagnetic characteristics, which can have an important impact on the boundary conditions and then request the reflected wave to produce extra magnetic field besides linear medium. Furthermore, this extra magnetic field may vary with the direction of So to get the total magnetic field of reflected wave, the specific impact of the term of should be considered and the magnetic field boundary conditions should be modified correspondingly.
In this case, the direction of is parallel to the incident plane (XOZ plane), so the Kerr rotation angle is zero. When is in the Y axis (i.e., transverse direction), the reflected wave’s total magnetic field is
When is along Z direction (i.e., poloidal direction), one needs not only the boundary conditions of (2) and (3), but also the boundary condition that the normal components of magnetic field are continuous, that is
Then we can obtain
In this case, the electric/magnetic field vibration direction of incident wave is parallel/perpendicular to the incident plane. When we just take account of the linear part of electromagnetic characteristic law of ideal ferromagnetic medium, with the boundary conditions that tangential components of electric fields and magnetic fields are continuous separately on the interface, H′ is solved as
The derivation with no more detailed description is similar as in the S-wave case.
and the Kerr rotation angle is
then the Kerr rotation angle is
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Based on the analysis in Section 3, we can draw a conclusion that magneto-optical Kerr effect is generated when LPPW propagates on the surface of ideal ferromagnetic medium. The Kerr rotation angle β value is related with the incident angle and magnetic field H, and with the different directions of the corresponding change laws are different, as shown in Table 1.
The Kerr rotation angle β with along different directions.
|X (longitudinal)||β= 0, no rotation|
|Y (transverse)||β= 0, no rotation|
|Z (poloidal)||β= 0, no rotation|
According to Table 1, we can see that for S-wave the Kerr rotation angle β≠0, and on the contrary β=0 for P-wave only when along the Y axis (transverse direction). Furthermore, when is along the X or Z axis, the expressions of β are same for P-wave.
For simplicity, the following analysis on the variation trends of the Kerr rotation angle with the incident angle θ and magnetic field H, is in the conditions of the LPPW incident on the ideal ferromagnetic medium from vacuum, namely medium-1 is vacuum. Therefore, the magnetic conductivity and dielectric constant of medium-1 and medium-2 are respectively adopted as: μ1 = μ0=4π×10-7H/m, ε1=ε0=8.85×10-12 F/m, and μ2=500×4π×10-7 H/m, ε2=5.51×8.85×10-12 F/m. Here μ2 and ε2 of ideal ferromagnetic medium are taken the values as manganese zinc ferrite, and according to its hysteresis loop of manganese, M0 is estimated as M0=4×104 A/m. After substituting above constant values into Table 1, one can get the functions of β only related with two variables: the incident angle θ and magnetic field H, as shown in Figure 2.
If the magnetic field H of incident wave is adopted as H=4.59×103A/m (here we ignore other interaction effects of wave with substances) , the refraction law and sin2 θ + cos2 θ=1 are also considered, for direction along the X(Z) axis β can be simplified as
according to Table 1. β∈ [0.09, 0.11] because of θ∈ [0, π/2]. The β is defined as the included angle between the vector direction of total magnetic field in reflected wave and the incident plane, it should not be greater than π/2 rad, therefore the absolute value is adopted in (9). Figure 3(a) shows that β is monotone increasing very slowly with θ increasing, which can be easily understood when considering Eq. (9) and tangent function variation curve with cosθ ∈ [0, 1]. On the other hand, when the incident angle θ is considered as a constant π/4 rad, Figure 3(b) indicates β changes with H as Eq. (10)
It increases very slowly when H belongs to 0~103 A/m, but rapidly increases when H belongs to 103~106 A/m, and it trends to a stable value of π/2 rad when H≥106 A/m.
For direction along the Y axis and H=4.59×103 A/m, according to Table 1, the Kerr rotation angle β can be simplified as
When the incident θ∈ [0, π/2], β∈ [1.46, π/2] within a very small range of about 0.1 rad. In Eq. (11), because there is a term of (10cosθ-1) on the denominator, we can see that with the increase of θ, the value of this term changes from positive to 0 and then to negative, i.e., the direction of the total magnetic field of reflected wave will have a reversal. However, according to the definition of β, here we also take the absolute value in Eq. (11). Figure 4(a) shows that when θ increases from 0, according to cosine function properties, β is about 1.48 rad and the increase is not obviously at the beginning. When θ near 1.47 rad, β rapidly increases to π/2 rad, and then sharp decreases to about 1.46 rad after θ continues to increase. The location of peak value of β= π/2 rad is θ=1.47 rad, which is a fixed value due to the peak position is decided by the term of equal to zero on the denominator of the expression of β list in Table 1. When the incident angle θ is considered as a constant π/4 rad, from Figure 4(b) based on Eq. (12)
we can see a curve with reverse trend with H comparing to Figure 3(b).
CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
Based on the classical electromagnetic theory, we study th e propagation behavior of LPPW incident on the surface of the ideal ferromagnetic medium of constitutive relation which is different from the general linear homogeneous medium and leads to the magneto-optical Kerr effect. We discuss in detail the change law of the Kerr rotation angle with the incident angle and the magnetic field for along different directions in S-wave and P-wave. The theoretical analysis indicates that the Kerr rotation angle β has the follow characteristics: (1) for S-wave the Kerr rotation angle β≠0, but β=0 for P-wave only when along the Y axis (transverse direction); when is along the X or Z axis (longitudinal or poloidal direction), the expressions of β are r same for P-wave. (2) When the inr cident angle θ increases and magnetic field H is invariant, β has a slow growth with in the X or Z direction; when direction is the Y axis, there is a peak value of β=π/2 rad and the position of this peak does not change. (3) With the incident magnetic field H increases and incident angle θ is invariant, β increases from about 0 rad to the maximum value of π/2 rad when direction is in the X or Z axis; however, when is along the Y axis β decreases from π/2 rad to 0 rad.
The analysis employing the classical electromagnetic theory on the magneto-optical Kerr effect in this paper can share some similarity with other investigations, e.g., the electro-optic Kerr effect, Faraday effect, and the concerned phenomena of total reflection and Brewster angle. These theoretical studies can shed light on the application of new technology related with the subjects mentioned above.
Shao-Peng Hao, Yu-Ling Song, “The Kerr effect of a dielectric/anti ferromagnetic/metal sandwiched structure,” Natural Sciences Journal of Harbin Normal University 32(1), 80–83 (2016).Google Scholar
Guo-Qian Zhang, Yon-Ming Yang and Zhen-Bin Zhang, “Using Self-made Observation Systematic of Magnetic Domain Magneto-optical Kerr” Materials Review 24(10), 115–117 (2010).Google Scholar
Tse, Wang-Kong, A. H. MacDonald, “Giant magneto-optical Kerr effect and universal Faraday effect in thin-film topological insulator,” Physical Review Letter 306(5703), 057401 (2004).Google Scholar
Ying Jiang, Hong-Yu Zou, “Measuring surface magnetism by surface magneto optic Kerr effect,” Journal of Liaoning Normal University 29(4), 433–434 (2006).Google Scholar
Ping-An Liu, Fei Ding, “Magnetic hysteresis loop of the ferromagnetic film measured by using the test system of surface magneto optic Kerr effect,” Jour nal of Liao ning Normal University (Natural Science Edition) 9(26), 3–5 (2006).Google Scholar
Ting-jun Ma, Ling An, and Wei-Jie Chen, “Magneto-optical Kerr effect and its measurement,” Journal Harbin University of Commerce 21(6), 787–788 (2005).Google Scholar
Feng-Xi Jin, Long Sun, and Cheng-Gui Wang, “Measurement of dispersive power of optical material with Faraday effect principle,” Journal of Yanbian University 28(3), 165–167 (2002).Google Scholar
Dong-Liang Qian, Liang-Yao Chen, et al., “A method to measure completely the magneto-optical Kerr and Faraday effects,” Acta Optica Sinica 19(4), 474–480 (1999).Google Scholar
Xin-Wei Chen, Fu-Sheng Qiu, et al., “A method for measuring completely the Faraday effects and losses in optical mirror coated,” Acta Photonica Sinica 38(11), 2937–2941 (2009).Google Scholar
Xue-Long Zhang, Guo-Ying Zhang, et al., “The classical and quantum theory of magneto-optical Faraday effect.,” Guangxi Sciences 12(1), 22–24 (2005).Google Scholar
Jia-Fu Wang, Zuo-Yi Li, et al., “A quantum scattering method for the magneto-optical Kerr effect,” Journal of Huazhong University Ofence & Technology 23(8), 19–22 (1995).Google Scholar
Qing-Chun Zhou, Rong-Qing Xu, and Jia-Fu Qang, “Temperature dependence of magneto-optical Kerr effect,” Acta Sinica Quantum Optica 7(4), 172–175 (2001).Google Scholar
Liang-Yao Chen, “Fundamentals and measurements of magnet-optic Faraday and Kerr effects,” Semiconductor Optoelectronics 12(4), 392–397 (1991).Google Scholar
Jackson, John David, [Classical electrodynamics], Mup., 13–19 (1900).Google Scholar
Shao-Xian Meng, “Ultrastrong laser fields physics,” Progress in Physics 19(3), 236–269 (1999).Google Scholar