The Fiber Sensor Demonstrator (FSD) provides temperature and pressure monitoring for various Proba-2 subsystems, including a hybrid propulsion system. It includes a redundant architecture developed for critical fiber-optic components, and a lightweight, ruggedized fiber-optic signal harness for use in space.
Spacecraft propulsion subsystems  require an array of different sensors to monitor the propellant tank pressure and integrity, the gas-line valve temperatures and status, the propellant mass flow rate and the thruster temperatures. This is currently performed using various electronic sensors at a substantial mass and performance penalty due to the shielding requirements of these sensors. The current electrical sensors have a number of drawbacks, including sensitivity to EMI, susceptibility to sparking, low sensor capacity per wire, sensor response times, and the proximity requirements for the associated electronics. The optical fiber sensors, provide an alternative that can solve many of these issues .
FIBER SENSOR DEMONSTRATOR SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
FSD has been launched on ESA’s Proba-2 satellite in November 2009. It contains sixteen temperature sensors to measure the temperature at different locations in the satellite, and one High-Temperature (HT) sensor to measure the transient high temperature in the thruster, as well as one Pressure/Temperature (P/T) sensor to measure the xenon tank pressure. First set of on-orbit test data were obtained in January 2010.
The advantages of the FBG approach include a central interrogation module that controls the variety of different fiber-optic sensors including temperature, pressure, actuator status, and propellant leakage. The combination of both parallel signal distribution and serial wavelength division sensor multiplexing along single strands of fiber enables high sensor capacities.
Fiber-optic sensors employ a signal link via an optical fiber, allowing the subsequent electronic processing to be located remotely from critical areas of the spacecraft. This facilitates minimization of electromagnetic interferences and avoids the safety issues associated with electronics near the propulsion subsystem. Signals on a fiber-optic line are bidirectional, allowing a single fiber to carry both the source signal to the optical sensor and the reflected return signal back to the interrogation system. The temperature of FSD Interrogation module is also acquired through two internal thermistors AD590.
The FSD employs a redundant temperature-compensated narrow-band reference FBG in series with the external FBG sensors (see Fig. 1) for each of the six sensor lines to provide an absolute wavelength reference. The FBG reference is kept in a small athermal packaging, keeping its wavelength practically independent from temperature (about 0.001 nm/C). The two thermistors ADS590, permit to confirm the accuracy of the FBG against long term potential shift of the FBG wavelength. In addition there are the readings of the laser diodes internal temperature provided by the diodes circuit. The thermistors, the FBG references and the temperature of the laser diodes give a good picture of the temperature evolution within the Interrogation module.
The Pressure/Temperature (P/T) sensor employs a heat-treated, orbitally-welded stainless-steel housing that is suitable for direct contact with propellants such as hydrazine. It can be employed for either single-ended or differential pressure measurements. The P/T sensor was proof-tested in N2 at 1200 psi, relative to the maximum operating pressure of 600 psi. The FSD innovative P/T sensor uses multiple FBG gratings with special mounting to provide simultaneous pressure (P-sense) and temperature (T-sense) measurements. The pressure readings are independent of the gas composition (see Fig. 5). The integral temperature measurements are employed to correct for the effects of temperature on the pressure readings.
The High Temperature (HT) Sensor measures the transient response of the SSTL thruster during firing, it is protected in a microtubing tip that is only 0.34 mm O.D. for minimal thermal mass.
The Four lines of Distributed FBG Sensors have a special proprietary packaging that was developed to nearly triple the effective sensor sensitivity to temperature (Δλ/ΔT ≅0.03 nm/°C), permitting a resolution of 0.05 °C.
Specifications of the FSD Sensors.
|MEMS/FBGTemperature||Pipeline temperature/propulsion system||-40 to 70 °C||5 nm per sensor||0.05 °C|
|Combined pressure/temperature sensor||Xe Tank pressure||0 to 45 Bar||15 nm||2 mbar|
|-40 to 70°C||5 nm||0.05 °C|
|High-T FBG sensor||Thruster temperature||-40 to 350°C||10 nm||0.1 to 0.2°C|
A tuneable Fabry Perot, controlled by a fast piezo-electric element, permits the fiber laser to sweep the spectral range and read the intensity at each wavelength between 1520 and 1560 nm. A fixed Fabry-Perot interferometer of 50 GHz follows the tuneable one and is the basic component to measure the wavelength of the FBGs. Its accuracy is a good sign of the sensor functionality in space.
The interrogation module (15cmx17cmx12cm) is under 1.3 kg, and requires less than 2.5 W peak power.
The DAQ PCB is employing spacegrade and MIL-883 milgrade components for the critical functions, including a 16 bit A/D converter and serial interface D/A drivers from Maxwell. To minimize the power consumption, micropower op amps are employed for the analog signal processing. The DAQ PCB includes the control/monitoring electronics for the tuneable fiber-laser diode pumps and filters, as well as eight fiber-coupled InGaAs detector channels with individual preamplifiers for the six external FBG sensor lines and two internal reference lines.
ON ORBIT MEASUREMENTS
MPBC is monitoring periodically the performance of fiber laser and the FBG sensors. The FSD unit measures Proba-2 temperature variations in increments over an orbit, when requested by ESA. The following figures provide examples of the measurements.
• Fig.4 compares the temperature given by the HT fiber sensor, located on the exit of the thruster, with that provided by the standard thermocouple placed at the bottom of the thruster. They follow the same trend with a temperature about 50 °C higher at the HT position, in the peak of preheat experiment.
• Fig.5 shows the scan of the four FBG sensors monitoring the temperature on the Bus (Fiber Line_sens6), along with the first FBG reference (at 1530 nm). The wavelength shifts of the four FBG sensors are different indicating different temperatures seen by each of them. The four sensors sensors are spaced by 50 cm each and very probably they are affected by the sunlight and shadow differently.
• Fig.6 shows the evolution of the temperature during one orbit cycle as observed by these four FBG sensors on the Bus.
• Fig.7 presents a zoom of the 4000 pixels scanned by the tuneable Fabry Perot, over 45 nm (1520 nm- 1565 nm). It compares the evolution of the intensity of the Fixed Fabry-Perot Interferometer signal (50 GHz, 0.4 nm). There is no difference between the intensity after integration on Proba-2, before the launch, and the first measurement in orbit a few months later . The width of a single scan of the Fabry Perot on orbit is very similar to that on the ground, however the peak signal intensity is reduced by about 15-20% over the 7 years in space. This is the largest variation observed on any of the FSD parameters.
• Fig.8 illustrates the evolution of the main FSD parameters during the flight, since the last measurements on the ground. We can see the relative fluctuations of the Interrogation module inside temperature between 18°C and 32°C, and the slight linear slope of the increasing radiation level observed by the RADFET measurements.
• Fig. 9 gives the calibration of the RADFET according to the supplier at 20°C. It is about 1 krad/year, and fits globally with the predicted radiation measured by ESA . The small fluctuations are due to the temperature changes.
FBG TEST WITH HIGH GAMMA RADIATION DOSE
A test was made by a third party (Kayser-threde, Germany) addressing the stability of the FBGs in equivalent harsh radiation -space environment. MPBC prepared three kinds of packaging:
- Bare FBGs (only 5μm polyimide coating)
- Medium thickness tube stainless steel (0.83 mm thick)
- Larger thickness stainless steel tube (1.37mm thick)
The FBGs were submitted to high radiation level (25Mega-rad at 420 krad/h) - 250 times larger than the 100 krad commonly requested. The effect on the FBGs was a small shift (200 pm, equivalent to the shift in the Central Wavelength (CWL). A second radiation test (250 krad, at 4.1 krad/h) confirmed the small CWL shift. For 100 krad the CWL shift is less than 5 pm at the 4.1 krad/h, and less than 10 pm at 420 krad/h.
DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSION
The Fixed Fabry Perot signal is reduced by 15-20% after the 6.5 years. All the other FSD parameters seem more constant, with a trend of decreasing signal of the Laser diode pumps by about 5-10% over the 6.5 years.
The FBG sensors are at the end of the circuit and shall see the effect of all the effects received by the other components in the opto-electronic circuits. The evolution of the FBGs peaks from three different lines showed about 3-10% reduction in their intensity (Fig. 10), depending on the sensor itself.
The FSD confirmed the reliability to use Optical Fiber Sensors in space missions and demonstrate its capability to monitor different parameters such as pressure and temperature at different level. The FSD on Proba-2 opens the door to a variety of other fiber sensor applications such as launch vibrations, liquid level in tanks and high temperature atmospheric re-entry.
R. Brandt; “Design and development status of European propellant gauging devices and techniques”; Proceedings of the Spacecraft Propulsion international conferences organised by ESA and CNES, Toulouse, France, 8–10, Nov. 1994.Google Scholar
I. Mckenzie and N. Karafolas, “Fiber Optic Sensing in Space Structures: The Experience of the European Space Agency,” OFS, 2005.Google Scholar
R.V. Kruzelecky, J. Zou, E. Haddad, W. Jamroz, F. Ricci, E. Edwards, I. McKenzie, P. Vuilleumier; “Fiber-Optic Sensor Demonstrator (FSD) Preliminary Test Results On Proba-2”, Proceedings ICSO 2010, 15–20 Oct. 2010 Rhodes, Greece.Google Scholar
M. Poisat, “Inputs Sector analysis TDM-Proba-2” ESA Internal Report, 2007Google Scholar
P. Putzer, Private Communication, Kayser-Threde, Munich, Germany March, 2014Google Scholar