17 November 2017 Ion irradiation effects on lithium niobate etalons for tunable spectral filters
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 10563, International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2014; 105634U (2017) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2304068
Event: International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2014, 2014, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
Abstract
Solar Orbiter is a mission dedicated to solar and heliospheric physics. It was selected as the first mediumclass mission of ESA's Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 Programme. Solar Orbiter will be used to examine how the Sun creates and controls the heliosphere, the vast bubble of charged particles blown by the solar wind into the interstellar medium. One of the scientific payload elements of Solar Orbiter is the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (PHI). The PHI instrument consists of two telescopes, a High Resolution Telescope (HRT) that will image a fraction of the solar disk at a resolution reaching ~150 km at perihelion, and a Full Disk Telescope (FDT) to image the full solar disk during all phases of the orbit. PHI is a diffraction limited, wavelength tunable, quasi-monochromatic, polarisation sensitive imager. These capabilities are needed to infer the magnetic field and line-of-sight (LOS) velocity of the region targeted by the spacecraft. For the spectral analysis, PHI will use an order-sorting filter to isolate a bandpass of the order of 100 mÅ . The FilterGraph (FG) contains an etalon in single pass configuration as tunable spectral filter located inside a temperature stabilized oven. This filter will be made by means of a z-cut LiNbO3 crystal (about 300 microns thick) and multilayer coatings including a conductive one in order to apply a high voltage (up to 5 kV) and induce the required electric field to tune the filter.

Solar Orbiter observing mission around the Sun will expose the PHI instrument to extreme radiation conditions, mainly dominated by solar high-energy particles released during severe solar events (protons with energies typically ranging from few keV up to several GeV) and the continuous isotropic background flux of galactic cosmic rays (heavy ions, from Z=1 to Z=92). The main concerns are whether the cumulated radiation damage can degrade the functionality of the filter or, in the worst case, the impact of a single highly ionizing particle, coupled with the HV field, could trigger a dielectric breakdown in the Lithium Niobate.

In this paper we present the electro-optical results obtained when exposing a set of LN samples and a lowquality full size etalon to different radiation conditions. In a first irradiation campaign, performed at the Centre for Micro Analysis of Materials (CMAM-Madrid) facilities, we were mainly focused on the long-term degradation effects with a series of high flux (109 cm-2 s-1) proton tests at an energy of 10 MeV. In order to study the possibility of a single ion breakdown, a second campaign was carried out, at the Texas A&M University (TAMU), exposing Lithium Niobate to high LET ion species (78Kr, 40Ar, 129Xe, 197Au) accelerated to the GeV energy range to penetrate or even pass through the entire Lithium Niobate thickness.
Garranzo, Ibarmia, Alvarez-Herrero, Olivares, Crespillo, and Díaz: ION IRRADIATION EFFECTS ON LITHIUM NIOBATE ETALONS FOR TUNABLE SPECTRAL FILTERS

I.

INTRODUCTION

PHI (Polarimetric Helioseismic Imager) is designed to carry out solar photospheric intensity, velocity and magnetic field measurements [1]. The measurement principle of PHI is based on imaging spectropolarimetric observations of a photospheric absorption line in the solar visible-light spectrum. Therefore PHI is a diffraction limited, wavelength tunable, quasi-monochromatic and polarisation sensitive imager.

The PHI instrument consists of two telescopes, a High Resolution Telescope (HRT) that will image a fraction of the solar disk at a resolution reaching ~150 km at perihelion, and a Full Disk Telescope (FDT) to image the full solar disk during all phases of the orbit (distances from 1 to 0.28 AU). The two telescopes can work sequentially and their selection is made by the Feed Selection Mechanism (FSM), which feeds one filtergraph (FG), the camera optics and one focal plane array (FPA). The FG provides for a very narrow passband filter centered at a wavelength of λ=617 nm. The polarimetric analysis is performed by one polarization modulation package (PMP) [2] in each of the telescopes. The modulation scheme is the same as the one used in the IMaX instrument of the Sunrise mission [3].

The radiation environment for the Solar Orbiter mission [4, 5] foresees two major components:

  • Energetic protons (with energies typically below 1 GeV) coming from the solar wind and from individual Solar Particle Events. They represent the main contribution to the cumulative degradation of components and/or materials along the mission, but will have a low impact, in terms of a direct singleion induced breakdown, due to their low LET.

  • The continuous isotropic background flux of Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR), consisting of ion species from Z=1 to Z=92 covering almost all the energy spectral range. Although the GCR predicted fluxes are low compared to the solar proton component, there exists a significant possibility for a heavy ion to pass through the S/C outer shielding structure and reach internal parts with extremely ionizing LET values (see fig.1.).

Fig. 1.

Galactic Cosmic Ray LET Spectra predicted by CREME96 at 1 AU for nominal solar quiet conditions, worst week/worst case, and peak 5 minute. Fluxes are slowed-down by generic aluminium shielding of 1 g/cm2.

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_3_1.jpg

II.

EXPECTED DIRECT DAMAGES UNDER ION IRRADIATION

Due to the harsh ionizing radiation environment during the SO mission and the particular operating conditions of PHI Lithium Niobate (LN) Etalons, it is necessary to test this technology under representative conditions that simulate the environment in order to verify the fulfilment of all the mission requirements.

Lithium niobate (LN) - stoichiometric formula LiNbO3 - is a compound of niobium, lithium and oxygen. It is a dielectric material; in fact, it is characterized by large pyroelectric, piezoelectric, nonlinear and electro-optic (EO) coefficients. For example, in the case of LN, the extraordinary index changes when the electric field is applied along the crystal symmetry axis (z-axis). LN is classified as a negative uniaxial crystal, having two different refractive indices for ordinary and extraordinary polarized light, no and ne respectively, with ne<no, which depend slightly on the stoichiometry of the crystal and on temperature [6,7]. There are some phenomena well described of damage of LN under heavy ion irradiation [8-10], either considering just one impact or the accumulation of several impacts in the same area.

LN Etalons have the advantage to provide high resolution performances when used as a tuneable spectral filter, an essential requirement to complete the polarization measurements and spectroscopic analyses PHI is expected to carry out. However, to achieve such performances and allow a dynamic wavelength tuning range, the Etalons require to be polarized with a considerable High Voltage field between their surfaces (typically varying from -5 to +5 kV) with the consequent risk of inducing an electrical discharge in the case of a shortcut. In normal conditions, no short-circuits are expected to occur if Etalon electrodes are correctly isolated and inside of an effective isolating atmosphere, but the situation could dramatically change if a highly ionizing particle reaches the Etalon, passes through it and deposits significant amounts of energy along its track, what eventually could induce an electron-ionized plasma connecting the HV electrodes. In this scenario, the risk of creating a conducting path through the Etalon, with potentially destructive consequences, cannot be neglected. It should be observed that the dielectric breakdown voltage for LN approximately is 26 kV/mm while PHI Etalons are required to operate with voltages up to 5 kV along their 350 μm thickness, which is equivalent to ~14 kV/mm (54% of the breakdown voltage).

Therefore, by impact accumulation in operations conditions an effective medium is generated in the crystal with the embedded tracks, whose refractive index is shifted progressively towards lower values than the virgin substrate. This would generate a bias in the etalon response. Moreover, the amorphized volume will lose its EO coefficients, thence limiting the effective electro-optic response of the device progressively as a function of the cumulated fluence. This would be a more severe problem, since there is no way to compensate it. However, this extreme case seems not to be the most probable case given the spectra of ions present is space and the fact that the higher stopping power of heavy ions allow to stop them in the shields/layers of the instrument.

II.

SUMMARY OF IRRADIATION TESTS.

By the above, a series of tests by irradiating different areas of a single etalon and on samples obtained from a wafer of the same type as the etalon (LN z-cut, thickness 350 μm) realized from CSIRO LTD. Company. In the test conduced at CMAM facilities we were mainly focused on the long-term degradation effects with a series of high flux (109cm-2s-1) proton tests at energy of 10MeV. These tests were carried out in vacuum conditions and with a rectangular beam size of 2x2mm. In order to study the possibility of a single ion breakdown, a second campaign was carried out, at the Texas A&M University (TAMU), exposing LN to high LET ion species (78Kr, 40Ar, 129Xe, 197Au) accelerated to the GeV energy range to penetrate or even pass through the entire LN thickness. The tests were in room conditions with a circular beam size the diameter 6.35mm.

Table.1.

Samples under test

CMAMTAMU
IonSampleFluence(cm-2)Δt (s)HV(4.5kV)IonLETSurfacein Si(MeVcm2mg-1)SampleFluence(cm-2)Δt (s)HV(2.5kV)
1HEnergy10 MeVP11012128ON78KrEnergy2979MeV14.7TAMU-011.0·10694ON
P21.65·101133ONTAMU-012.0·106264ON
P31012200ONTAMU-025.0·106637ON
P4 (SPOT 1)1.5·10132935ONTAMU-035.0·106860ON
P4 (SPOT A)1012200OFFETALON C15.0·106651ON
P4 (SPOT B)101120OFF40ArEnergy1561MeV3.9TAMU-042.0·107512ON
P8 – 1A6.3·1091OFFTAMU-052.0·107464ON
P8 – 1B10101.6OFFTAMU-062.0·107331ON
P8 – 2C101116OFFETALON 022.0·107274ON
P8 – 2D1.1·1012160OFF129XeEnergy2814MeV40.3TAMU-074.98·106427ON
ETALON C16.3·1091ONTAMU-084.98·106510ON
ETALON C210101.6ONTAMU-095.0·106571ON
ETALON C3101116ONTEST-016.18·10559ON
ETALON C41.1·1012160ONTEST-016.79·10560ON
     TEST-015.76·10559ON
ETALON 031.0·107921ON
197AuEnergy2172MeV86.3ETALON 051.8·1071171ON

In test performed at TAMU was found that the Etalon suffered a non-destructive electrical discharge at about ~3300V, when an electrical arc was observed between one of the contacts and the Etalon border, likely due to a defect in the contact together with the high ionization of the surrounding air. It was decided, in order to preserve the Etalon integrity, to lower the nominal HV to a conservative value of 2500V. This value ensured no electrical discharge was triggered and it was still enough representative of the actual Etalon operational conditions

Fig. 2.

Wafer Sample, raw etalon & Irradiation Mask.

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_4_1.jpg

III.

ELECTRICAL RESPONSE.

For each irradiation test, the monitoring of the sample current in real time has allowed us the detection of a possible electrical disruption inside the sample, which supposes a dielectric breakdown in the device.

The Electric field will be applied between the + z-side and –z-side through High Voltage (HV) power supply (5 kV). The measurement and acquisition on-time of the sample holder current (Is) during the irradiation was performed using a Pico Ammeter (Keithley Mod. 6485) following the electrical schematic shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(a) Schematic electrical diagram. (b) Acquisition and monitoring set-up. (c) Dielectric breakdown test.

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_5_1.jpg

The proton ion beam produces an ion current (IH). When beam off, IH = 0, and, thus, Is = Ib. In order to protect the picoammeter of a possible huge amount of current ‘Is as a consequence of a shortcut induced in LN sample by a disruption event, a resistor is placed. Thus, if a significant change is appreciated in ‘Rs’ after ion beam irradiation, it should be considered as a consequence of the ion induced damage being a fingerprint of creation of conduction channels by disruption events inside the LN sample, connecting both isolated faces and increasing the drift current between them, producing in the worst case, the total shortcut and the structural breaking of the sample. For the wafer samples a thin film of 40-50 nm Au will be deposited on the +z-cut LN face up to the ion beam playing the role of an active electrode, so the ions beam pass completely through the samples. They were individually mounted on Aluminium disks. The etalon has its own electrodes and coatings.

Fig. 4.

(a) Test 04 – Sample P4 (Spot 1/Step 2) electrical response to HV with H+ irradiation beam ON. (b) SPOT D current monitoring of the CSIRO Etalon (Area C4). Fluence 1012 cm-2, HV = 4.6 kV.

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_5_2.jpg

Fig. 5.

(a) Current through TAMU-07 during 129Xe irradiation. Applied HV = 4.5 kV. (b) Current through Etalon Area T3 as function of applied HV=2.5 kV before, during and after irradiation.

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_5_3.jpg

In none of the tests carried out shows that a dielectric breakdown caused by the ion beam occurs. In the above figures it can be observed some results obtained on samples or the etalon.

IV.

OPTICAL RESPONSE.

If radiation has somehow affected the physical properties of the etalon should see these reflected in their optical behaviour. The equations describing the performance of a single pass through an etalon are well-known [11-14]. The Airy formula describing the intensity distribution of the light passing through the etalon is:

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_6_1.jpg

Where Ii and It represent the incident and transmitted light intensity respectively, τ is the etalon peak transmission related to the fraction of light absorbed, A, by the combined effect of the etalon and the coatings. The parameter F is primarily related to the etalon surfaces reflectivity R.

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_6_2.jpg

The phase difference is given by:

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_6_3.jpg

With λ representing the wavelength, n’ the refractive index of the etalon, h is the thickness of the etalon (with a nominal value of h0 for the reference wavelength λ0) and the propagation angle inside the etalon, θ’.

For LN the refractive index changes with wavelength (dispersion). These changes have been included in the results presented in this work by taking into account the dependence of the refractive index with wavelength and temperature. The maximum transmittance occurs when δ is equal to zero or π. Hence the wavelength of maximum transmittance can be tuned by varying n’, h, or θ’.

A.

Transmittance

The LN is not totally transparent and this results in a reduction of the total transmittance of the etalon that need to be taken into account. Changes in the parameters described before can change the spectrum transmitted by the etalon. Mainly three effects on the etalon optical response could happen:

  • Shift in the tuned wavelength: due to changes in thickness or the refraction index of the LN substrate. This shift could be correct during the mission with a proper method of calibration during the flight by applying another voltage different from the nominal one.

  • Broadening of the transmission peak: due to changes in the thickness or the complex refractive index of the coatings, and, therefore changing the reflectivity of the dielectric multilayer mirrors. Changes on the coatings can be a since a small reduction of the reflectivity of the coatings produce a large decrease of the effective finesse and therefore, broadening of the peak tuned by the etalon. It could be critical for PHI and it cannot be corrected.

  • Reduction of the transmission peak: the grown of colour centers would produce absorption peaks in the material (coatings or/and LN substrate). It could imply a reduction of the etalon transmission, being critical for the SO/PHI operation if the throughput requirement is not fulfilled.

The transmittance measurements were carried out with the ellipsometer VASE to guarantee the normal incidence. Although the same position before and after irradiation is not possible guarantee by mechanical positioners. All the measurements indicate that the etalon is very inhomogeneous.

The fig.6 shows two measurements very close to the centre of the etalon and other three measurements at inside a same area very close to each other. The location and magnitude of the transmission peaks change, so it the thickness and/or refraction index are changing. For the zones C1 to C5 were measured the transmittance before and after irradiation.

Fig. 6.

Transmittance in the same zones

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_6_4.jpg

Fig.7.

Transmittance Before (solid) & After (dash) Irradiation

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_7_1.jpg

We can not assert that the transmittance changes are due to irradiation and not to the inhomogeneity of the etalon, since we can not guarantee that we measure at exactly the same point.

B.

Thickness Map.

The thickness of the etalon defines the Free Spectral Range (FSR: separation between two successive etalon peaks) of the spectrum transmitted by the etalon and it is directly related with the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) that defines how broad is the peak tuned by the etalon. The etalon effective finesse which is usually measured empirically, contains information about all the parameters that can produce broadening and/or shift of the wavelength peak tuned by the etalon: defects, reflectance, aperture, and depending on the place situated along the optical instrument, tilt and relationship between the diameter of the beam entering the etalon and the beam from the telescope. We are going to try to get information about these two parameters measurement the transmittance in different angels and try to fit to an Airy function.

Fig. 8.

Thickness Map. Optical Set Up

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_7_2.jpg

If we represent the mean value of image for each angle and the images where we find a maximum, we can see that the etalon tuning in different zones, so the homogeneity (thickness, reflectance, refraction index, etc) is not right. This representation of the mean value versus the rotated angle should be similar to the Airy function for a given wavelength, and is very far from reality.

Fig. 9.

Behaviour Raw etalon

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_7_3.jpg

To these conditions we can not make an ideal flat-field and correct sampling for all the etalon. We had tried to find local solutions for different areas irradiated. For each local solution we found that the algorithm converges in very distant from each other solutions or even not converge. We have no exact coefficients tuning the etalon respect to temperature, so we represent the dispersion of the data on a relative value.

Fig. 10.

Relative Thickness Map

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_8_1.jpg

V.

DISCUSION.

The etalon effective finesse (Fe), which is usually measured empirically, contains information about all the parameters that produce broadening of the wavelength peak tuned by the etalon. Fe can be written as follows:

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_8_2.jpg

Where Fd is the defect finesse, FR is the reflectance finesse, Fa is the aperture finesse, Ftilt is the tilting finesse and Fdif is the diffraction finesse. If the effective fineness required for the instrument is greater than or equal to 30, so each factor of finesse must be greater than this value (Fe > 30 → Fi > 30). Usually the most significant is the reflectance finesse.

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_8_3.jpg

Fig. 11.

Reflectance Finesse for an Ideal Etalon.

00161_PSISDG10563_105634U_page_8_4.jpg

So whether, if we see changes in the finesse of a high quality etalon, we should be able to appreciate changes of less than 0.6% reflectance. However, a low finesse etalon reflectance changes in this order of magnitude do not translate into significant changes in fineness (as in our case). So it the effects due to radiation may not be reflected in measurements of thickness or finesse.

VI.

CONCLUSIONS.

In all wafer samples, when polarizing the LN with 4.5 kV an increase in the electrical current through the sample of up to few tens of nA was measured, corresponding to an average resistivity of around ~1014 Ohm-cm, in full agreement with the expected value for a common LN crystal. When turning the beam on with the HV still applied, different current results were obtained depending on the specific tested sample and the environment conditions. Even in the case of sample TEST-01, the polarization field was increased up to 7500V during the irradiation with 129Xe. No dielectric breakdown was observed for any sample. Moreover, it was also observed that no permanent damaged in the LN electrical properties was induced.

The full size Etalon was also irradiated with the most penetrating ion species (78Kr, 40Ar, 129Xe and 197Au) under high voltage (4.5-2.5kV) without observing any electrical breakdown or resistivity change. It can be concluded that the LN etalon doesn’t exhibit sensitivity to ion induced dielectric breakdown, for the mission representative ion species tested, and therefore it can be safely operated at the nominal high voltages required by PHI instrument.

With respect to the optical response, we have not been able to obtain true conclusions. Due to the in homogeneity of the etalon and no possibility to ensure the same position, transmittance measurements are not considered representative to identify whether changes are the result of irradiation. We have tried to make a measurement of the etalon thickness map. The behaviour of the etalon does not show the optimum conditions for such measures (in homogeneity. different temperatures, saturation or bad contrast at the images. Errors of fineness and thickness are so high that could hide any effect due to irradiation.

Furthermore the authors wish to acknowledge with much appreciation the crucial role of the staff of “Área de Instrumentación Óptica Espacial, Madrid, Spain”, “Centre for Micro Analysis of Materials, Madrid, Spain” and “The Cyclotron Institute - Texas A&M University (TAMU), College Station, USA” who gave the permission to use all required equipment and the necessary materials to complete this study. Which was supported by the Spanish MINECO funded SO/PHI project (‘AYA2012-39636-C06-01 Detailed design, manufacturing and integration of SO/PHI’ and ‘ESP2013-47349-C6-2R Manufacturing and integration of SO/PHI’).

VII.

VII.

REFERENCES.

[1] 

A. Gandorfer, S.K. Solanki, J. Woch, V. Martínez Pillet, A. Álvarez Herrero and T. Appourchaux, “The Solar Orbiter Mission and its Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (SO/PHI)”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 271 (2011), 012086.Google Scholar

[2] 

A. Álvarez-Herrero: “The polarization modulators based on liquid crystal variable retarders for the PHI and METIS instruments for the Solar Orbiter mission”, proceeding 66598 at International Conference on Space Optics (ICSO 2014).Google Scholar

[3] 

V. Martínez-Pillet, J.C. del Toro-Iniesta, A. Álvarez-Herrero, et al., “The Imaging Magnetograph eXperiment (IMAX) for the Sunrise Balloon-Borne Solar Observatory,” Solar Phys, 2011, 268, pp. 57–102.Google Scholar

[4] 

M.A. Xapsos, J.L. Barth, E.G. Stassinopoulos, E.A. Burke G.B. Gee: “Model for Emission of Solar Protons (ESP)-Cumulative and Worst-Case Event Fluences”, NASA Report TP-1999-209 763, Dec. 1999Google Scholar

[5] 

“CREME96: A Revision of the Cosmic Ray Effects on Micro-Electronics Code IEEE”, Trans. Nucl. Sci., 44, 2150–2160, 1997Google Scholar

[6] 

E. Allaria et al.: “Digital Holography at 10.6 μm”, Opt. Comm. 215, p.257–262 (2003).Google Scholar

[7] 

M. Luennemann, U. Hartwig, G. Panotopoulos, K. Buse1: “Electrooptic properties of lithium niobate crystals for extremely high external electric fields”, Appl. Phys. B 76, 403–406 (2003)Google Scholar

[8] 

F. Agulló-López, G. García, J. Olivares.: “Lattice pre-amorphization by ion irradiation: fluence dependence of the electronic stopping power threshold for amorphization”, J. Appl. Phys. (97) 093514, 2005Google Scholar

[9] 

J. Olivares, G. García, F. Agulló-López, F. Agulló-Rueda, J.C. Soares and A. Kling : “Optical investigations of the propagation of the amorphouscrystalline boundary in ionbeam irradiated LiNbO3”. Nucl. Inst. Methods B 242, 534–537, 2006.Google Scholar

[10] 

A. García-Navarro, F. Agulló-López, M. Bianconi, J. Olivares and G. García: “Kinetics of ion-beam damage in lithium niobate”, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 083506, (2007).Google Scholar

[11] 

M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1993).Google Scholar

[12] 

A. Álvarez-Herrero, T. Belenguer, C. Pastor, R.L. Heredero, G. Ramos, V. Martínez Pillet, J.A. Bonet Navarro: “Lithium Niobate Fabry-Perot etalons in double-pass configuration for spectral filtering in the visible imager magnetograph IMaX for the SUNRISE mission”, Proc SPIE 6265, G2652–G2652, Part 1-2 (2006)Google Scholar

[13] 

D. M. Rust, “Étalon filters”, Optical Engineering Vol. 33, 3342–3348 (1994).Google Scholar

[14] 

ACPO-CSIRO temperature controlled etalon (TCE) and power supply controller (PSC) instruction manual (2005).Google Scholar

© (2017) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
D. Garranzo, D. Garranzo, S. Ibarmia, S. Ibarmia, A. Alvarez-Herrero, A. Alvarez-Herrero, J. Olivares, J. Olivares, M. Crespillo, M. Crespillo, M. Díaz, M. Díaz, } "Ion irradiation effects on lithium niobate etalons for tunable spectral filters", Proc. SPIE 10563, International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2014, 105634U (17 November 2017); doi: 10.1117/12.2304068; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2304068
PROCEEDINGS
9 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top