Hyperspectral imaging (HI) is a powerful method of analysis to obtain the spectral composition of the radiation emitted by a subject. A HI device is typically made of a spectrophotometer and an imaging device. The obtained data set is known as “hyperspectral cube” and it is a 3D matrix formed by a 2D image to which is associated the spectral composition of each pixel.
Development of HI devices is growing due to the increasing numbers of applications, for example satellite Earth survey, spectroscopy, colorimetry, thermal imaging and so on. Classical HI devices are usually made by integrating a dispersive means (a prism or a grating) or a tuneable band-pass filter in an optical system. These devices have a good image quality and resolution but also a low efficiency in terms of photon collection. A comprehensive overview on classical HI devices can be found in .
When the spectrometer is based on an interferometer instead of a dispersive means there are two features that make this system a faster (or equivalently with higher luminosity) instrument when compared to the others at the same resolution. First, the Felgett or multiplex advantage arises from the fact that there is no spectral scanning and all the spectral components are acquired at the same time. Second, the Jacquinot or throughput advantage originates from the fact that the apertures used in the inteferometetric spectrometers have a larger area than the slits used in dispersive spectrometers, thus enabling higher throughput of radiation. On this basis, novel techniques using Michelson or Sagnac interferometer have been developed with interesting results as described in  and .
The hyperspectral imaging device developed at INRiM is based on a scanning low finesse Fabry-Perot interferometer [1, 2]. By applying an algorithm based on the Fourier transform (FT) to the interferogram it is possible to obtain the spectral composition of the subject. Here we present the results obtained in the visible region (VIS, 400-720 nm), and in the near infrared (NIR, 900-1700 nm) with a new version of the instrument.
HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING DEVICE
The hyperspectral imaging device is made by a F-P interferometer inserted in a simple optical system formed by a monochromatic camera and a photographic objective (Fig. 1).
The F-P interferometer
The F-P interferometer is the core of the HI device. It is made of two glass mirrors coated with a thin aluminum layer having a reflectivity around 25%, mounted in an aluminum frame. The distance between mirrors is varied from zero to 40 μm by means of three piezo actuators. During the cavity length scanning a video is captured so the variation of light intensity on each pixel is recorded.
The recorded data are then analyzed to obtain an interferogram from which it is possible to calculate the spectral composition of each pixel by applying a Fourier transform based algorithm. In order to apply the FT it is necessary to know the distance between the mirrors for each frame of the video. This is obtained with a calibration procedure based on the analysis of the interferogram of the pixels when illuminated by a monochromatic light (a laser) as described in .
The experimental setup
As described before, the HI system is made by a photographic objective, the F-P interferometer and a CCD camera. The simplified layout of the experiment is schematized in Fig. 2.
This prototype has an important improvement with respect to the previous prototype described in  and  where, in order to calibrate the mirror distance, the sample is illuminated with a reference laser and from the measured calibration interferogram it is possible to obtain the optical path difference (OPD) of the interferometer. In the present prototype the laser is sent to a diffuser close to the beam splitter in front of the photographic objective.
The calibration procedure is applied for each acquisition. It consists in recording two videos consequently: the first one is the video of the monochromatic source for calibration and the second one is the video of the target to be measured. The video frames of the two videos are triggered in such a way that they are synchronous with the mirror distance scan. Alternatively an area of the image that is not used in the analysis can be shone with the laser light and used for the calibration. In this case a single video is recorded.
Results show that calculation of the spectral distribution is possible even if the reference laser is not on the sample. This is particularly important because it means that it is possible to integrate the reference directly in the hyperspectral imaging device and to realize a more compact instrument. Furthermore, with this prototype is possible to recover the spectrum of a sample at great distances without the need of having the reference on it, simply by changing the photographic objective.
Here we present a selection of the results obtained in the VIS and in the NIR spectral regions: analysis of emission spectra in the visible, and analysis of emission (blackbody) and absorption spectra in the infrared, although the same set-up has been also successfully used to measure reflection spectra in the visible.
Emission spectral analysis in the visible
In the experimental setup presented, the sample is a 9 coloured square pattern displayed on a 13” LCD with LED backlight. The display is placed normal to the HI system at around 1 m distance from the camera sensor. The emission spectra have been compared with the reference spectra measured with a calibrated spectroradiometer. The spectroradiometer has been placed normal to the display at 2 m distance. Results are shown in Fig. 3
In this experiment we demonstrate that it is possible to infer the temperature of a body by looking at the shape of the emission spectrum. We have observed a tungsten strip lamp used for radiometer measurements. For each pixel of the image in Fig. 4 (left) we find the emission spectrum (Fig. 4 right) and fit it with the theoretical blackbody curve using the temperature as the fit parameter. In this way we assign a temperature value to each pixel of the image.
Here the experimental set-up is the following. A halogen lamp is used as a blackbody source in the infrared. The lamp was placed at two different distances from the instrument: 3,5 m and 75 m. The absorption of the air in between is observed. In Fig. 5 we can see the two spectra corresponding to the blackbody emission spectrum of the lamp where the absorption bands of the water contained in the air is observed.
The set-up is similar to the one described in the previous section. Here the blackbody source is the sun. In a first experiment we have observed the sunlight through a cloudy sky. It is evident the strong absorption in the water bands due to the high concentration of water vapor in the atmosphere (gray curve of Fig. 6). In a second experiment we have observed directly the spectrum of the sun surface (black curve of Fig. 6). A metallized mylar sheet has been placed in front of the objective to attenuate the sun light by a 99%.
With this new experimental setup we have confirmed the results obtained with the previous prototypes [1, 2] where the reference laser illuminated directly the sample. In this new setup the reference laser shines a diffuser instead of the sample and whose image is not on the image plane. This set-up permits the realization of a self calibrating, compact instrument and allows to observe objects placed far away (astronomic sources). Furthermore we have demonstrated the potentiality of the instrument in the infrared region allowing hyperspectral imaging of gas absorption spectra. Further results can be found in .
M. Pisani and M. Zucco, “Compact imaging spectrometer combining Fourier transform spectroscopy with a Fabry-Perot interferometer”, Optics Express vol.17, No. 10, 8319.Google Scholar
M. Pisani, M. Zucco and P. Bianco, “High throughput hyperspectral imaging in the near infrared”, Proc. of Optro 2010 Symposium, Optronics in defence and security, Paris, February 2010.Google Scholar
R.G. Sellar and G.D. Boreman “Classification of imaging spectrometers for remote sensing applications”, Opt. Eng. 44, 013602.Google Scholar
R.D. Alcock and J.M. Coupland “A compact, high numerical aperture imaging Fourier transform spectrometer and its applications”, Meas. Sci. Technol. 17, 2861–2868.Google Scholar
A Barduci., P. Marcoionni and I. Pippi “Spectral measurements with a new Fourier Transform Imaging Spectrometer (FTIS)”, Proc. of IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Conference on Instrument New Concepts: vol.3, 2023–2025.Google Scholar