8 March 2018 Comparison of water extraction methods in Tibet based on GF-1 data
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 10611, MIPPR 2017: Remote Sensing Image Processing, Geographic Information Systems, and Other Applications; 106110P (2018) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2288734
Event: Tenth International Symposium on Multispectral Image Processing and Pattern Recognition (MIPPR2017), 2017, Xiangyang, China
Abstract
In this study, we compared four different water extraction methods with GF-1 data according to different water types in Tibet, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Decision Tree Classifier based on False Normalized Difference Water Index (FNDWI-DTC), and PCA-SVM. The results show that all of the four methods can extract large area water body, but only SVM and PCA-SVM can obtain satisfying extraction results for small size water body. The methods were evaluated by both overall accuracy (OAA) and Kappa coefficient (KC). The OAA of PCA-SVM, SVM, FNDWI-DTC, PCA are 96.68%, 94.23%, 93.99%, 93.01%, and the KCs are 0.9308, 0.8995, 0.8962, 0.8842, respectively, in consistent with visual inspection. In summary, SVM is better for narrow rivers extraction and PCA-SVM is suitable for water extraction of various types. As for dark blue lakes, the methods using PCA can extract more quickly and accurately.
© (2018) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Lingjun Jia, Lingjun Jia, Kun Shang, Kun Shang, Jing Liu, Jing Liu, Zhongqing Sun, Zhongqing Sun, } "Comparison of water extraction methods in Tibet based on GF-1 data", Proc. SPIE 10611, MIPPR 2017: Remote Sensing Image Processing, Geographic Information Systems, and Other Applications, 106110P (8 March 2018); doi: 10.1117/12.2288734; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2288734
PROCEEDINGS
8 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top