16 May 2018 Microstereopsis is good, but orthostereopsis is better: precision alignment task performance and viewer discomfort with a stereoscopic 3D display
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Two separate experiments examined user performance and viewer discomfort during virtual precision alignment tasks while viewing a stereoscopic 3D (S3D) display. In both experiments, virtual camera separation was manipulated to correspond to no stereopsis cues (zero separation), several levels of microstereopsis (20, 40, 60, and 80%), and orthostereopsis (100% of interpupillary distance). Viewer discomfort was assessed before and after each experimental session, measured subjectively via self-report on the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ). Objective measures of binocular status (phoria and fusion ranges) and standing postural stability were additionally evaluated pre and postsessions. Overall, the results suggest binocular fusion ranges may serve as useful objective indicators of discomfort from S3D viewing, perhaps as supplemental measures to standard subjective reports. For the group as a whole, the S3D system was fairly comfortable to view, although roughly half of the participants reported some discomfort, ranging from mild to severe, and typically with the larger camera separations. Microstereopsis conferred significant performance benefits over the no-stereopsis conditions, so microstereoscopic camera separations might be of great utility for non-critical viewing applications. However, performance was best with near-orthostereoscopic or orthostereoscopic camera separations. Our results support the use of orthostereopsis for critical, high-precision manual spatial tasks performed via stereoscopic 3D display systems, including remote surgery, robotic interaction with dangerous or hazardous materials, and related teleoperative spatial tasks.
Conference Presentation
© (2018) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
John P. McIntire, John P. McIntire, Paul R. Havig, Paul R. Havig, Lawrence K. Harrington, Lawrence K. Harrington, Steve T. Wright, Steve T. Wright, Scott N. J. Watamaniuk, Scott N. J. Watamaniuk, Eric Heft, Eric Heft, } "Microstereopsis is good, but orthostereopsis is better: precision alignment task performance and viewer discomfort with a stereoscopic 3D display", Proc. SPIE 10666, Three-Dimensional Imaging, Visualization, and Display 2018, 106660Q (16 May 2018); doi: 10.1117/12.2297378; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2297378
PROCEEDINGS
20 PAGES + PRESENTATION

SHARE
RELATED CONTENT

Depth based 2D 3D combined scene images for 3D multiview...
Proceedings of SPIE (January 19 2009)
Stereo vision and telepresence
Proceedings of SPIE (April 10 1996)
3D vision system assessment
Proceedings of SPIE (February 17 2009)
Perception of size and shape in stereoscopic 3D imagery
Proceedings of SPIE (February 25 2012)

Back to Top