15 August 1989 What The Statistics Of Natural Images Tell Us About Visual Coding
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Why does the mammalian visual system represent information as it does? If we assume that visual systems have evolved to cope with the natural environment then we might expect the coding properties of the visual system to be related to the statistical structure of our environment. Indeed, images of the natural environment do not have random statistics. The first-order statistics (e.g., distribution of pixel values) and second-order statistics (e.g., power spectra) of natural images have been discussed previously and they bear important relations to visual coding. Statistics higher than second-order are difficult to measure but provide crucial information about the image. For example, it can be shown that the lines and edges found in natural images are a function of these higher-order statistics. In this paper, these higher-order statistics will be discussed in relation to the coding properties of the mammalian visual system. It is suggested that the spatial parameters of the cortical 'filters' (e.g., bandwidths of simple and complex cells) are closely related to these higher-order statistics. In particular, it will be shown that the spatial non-linearities shown by cortical complex cells provide the early visual system with the information required to learn about these statistics.
© (1989) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
David J. Field, David J. Field, } "What The Statistics Of Natural Images Tell Us About Visual Coding", Proc. SPIE 1077, Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display, (15 August 1989); doi: 10.1117/12.952724; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.952724
PROCEEDINGS
8 PAGES


SHARE
RELATED CONTENT

Inverting the perceptual transform
Proceedings of SPIE (April 30 1994)
Multiscale retinocortical model of contrast processing
Proceedings of SPIE (April 21 1996)
A Unification Of Brightness Theories
Proceedings of SPIE (August 14 1989)
Network compensation for missing sensors
Proceedings of SPIE (May 31 1991)
Convolution Squared Error Versus Observer Preference
Proceedings of SPIE (December 31 1986)

Back to Top