You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
26 February 2019Holmium:YAG vs thulium fiber laser dusting of calcium oxalate monohydrate stones
Luke A. Hardy,1 Viktoriya Vinnichenko,2 Nathaniel M. Fried1,3,4
1The Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte (United States) 2Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (Russian Federation) 3Carolinas Medical Ctr. (United States) 4Johns Hopkins Univ. (United States)
Recent advances in Holmium and Thulium fiber lasers (TFL) enable operation at similar parameters for comparison. A ‘dusting’ lithotripsy mode with low energy per pulse (0.2-0.4 J) and high pulse rates (50-80 Hz), is preferred to produce smaller residual stone fragments for natural passage through the urinary tract. Holmium and TFL were compared for dusting using three groups, G1: 0.2 J/50 Hz/10 W; G2: 0.2 J/80 Hz/16 W; and G3: 0.4 J/80 Hz/32 W. A setup with 1 x 1 cm cuvette and 1.0 mm sieve was used with total laser operation time limited to ≤ 5 min. Calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones with average initial stone mass of 216-297 mg between groups were used. Holmium ablation rates were lower than for TFL at all settings (G1: 0.3 ± 0.2 vs. 0.8 ± 0.2; G2: 0.6 ± 0.1 vs. 1.0 ± 0.4; G3: 0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 1.3 ± 0.9 mg/s). TFL also produced a greater percentage by mass of stone dust (< 0.5 mm) than Holmium. For all three settings, 1/15 (7%) stones treated with Holmium were fragmented in ≤ 5 min vs. 9/15 (60%) stones treated with TFL. These preliminary studies demonstrate that TFL is a viable laser for stone dusting, producing higher stone ablation rates and smaller stone fragments than Holmium laser.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Luke A. Hardy, Viktoriya Vinnichenko, Nathaniel M. Fried, "Holmium:YAG vs thulium fiber laser dusting of calcium oxalate monohydrate stones," Proc. SPIE 10852, Therapeutics and Diagnostics in Urology 2019, 108520I (26 February 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2506783