|
|
|
Proceedings Volume 10914, Optical Components and Materials XVI; 1091419 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2505580 Event: SPIE OPTO, 2019, San Francisco, California, United States Online Publication Date: 27 February 2019 Erratum Published: 28 December 2020 A revised version of this manuscript was published on 27 February 2019. Details of the revision are provided in the text that accompanies this Erratum. The original paper has been updated. The transmission electron microscope (TEM) of CsPbBr3 QDs from (Adv. Optical Mater. 2017, 1700565) has been used as the TEM of CsPbBr3 QDs in the inset of figure 2 in my paper (Proc. of SPIE Vol. 10914, 1091419, doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2505580). However, the data has never been cited the above paper (Adv. Optical Mater. 2017, 1700565). We have added this citation as reference [23] in the revised manuscript. Meanwhile, the photoresponse characteristics of the device has been incorrectly used as the photoresponse for parallel phototransistors in the inset of figure 3 (Adv. Optical Mater. 2017, 1700565). Correctly, the following figure presents the real photoresponse characteristics of the phototransistor. |
