Presentation + Paper
8 March 2019 Automatic trajectory and instrument planning for robot-assisted spine surgery
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Purpose. We report the initial implementation of an algorithm that automatically plans screw trajectories for spinal pedicle screw placement procedures to improve the workflow, accuracy, and reproducibility of screw placement in freehand navigated and robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw surgery. In this work, we evaluate the sensitivity of the algorithm to the settings of key parameters in simulation studies. Methods. Statistical shape models (SSMs) of the lumbar spine were constructed with segmentations of L1-L5 and bilateral screw trajectories of N=40 patients. Active-shape model (ASM) registration was devised to map the SSMs to the patient CT, initialized simply by alignment of (automatically annotated) single-point vertebral centroids. The atlas was augmented by definition of “ideal / reference” trajectories for each spinal pedicle, and the trajectories are deformably mapped to the patient CT. A parameter sensitivity analysis for the ASM method was performed on 3 parameters to determine robust operating points for ASM registration. The ASM method was evaluated by calculating the root-mean-square-error between the registered SSM and the ground-truth segmentation for the L1 vertebra, and the trajectory planning method was evaluated by performing a leave-one-out analysis and determining the entry point, end point, and angular differences between the automatically planned trajectories and the neurosurgeon-defined reference trajectories. Results. The parameter sensitivity analysis showed that the ASM registration algorithm was relatively insensitive to initial profile length (PLinitial) less than ~4 mm, above which runtime and registration error increased. Similarly stable performance was observed for a maximum number of principal components (PCmax) of at least 8. Registration error ~2 mm was evident with diminishing return beyond a number of iterations, Niter, ~2000. With these parameter settings, ASM registration of L1 achieved (2.0 ± 0.5) mm RMSE. Transpedicle trajectories for L1 agreed with reference definition by (2.6 ± 1.3) mm at the entry point, by (3.4 ± 1.8) mm at the end point, and within (4.9° ±2.8°) in angle. Conclusions. Initial results suggest that the algorithm yields accurate definition of pedicle trajectories in unsegmented CT images of the spine. The studies identified stable operating points for key algorithm parameters and support ongoing development and translation to clinical studies in free-hand navigated and robot-assisted spine surgery, where fast, accurate trajectory definition is essential to workflow.
Conference Presentation
© (2019) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Rohan C. Vijayan, Tharindu S. De Silva, Runze Han, Ali Uneri, Sophia A. Doerr, Michael D. Ketcha, Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja, Nicholas Theodore, and Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen "Automatic trajectory and instrument planning for robot-assisted spine surgery", Proc. SPIE 10951, Medical Imaging 2019: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, 1095102 (8 March 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2513722
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 3 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Image registration

Spine

Surgery

Computed tomography

Navigation systems

Algorithm development

Principal component analysis

Back to Top