Open Access Presentation + Paper
26 April 2019 Surface plasmon optoelectronics and exceptional point waveguides on silicon
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We discuss recent progress on plasmonic and metasurface optoelectronic devices on silicon. Emphasis is placed on devices for sub-bandgap hot-carrier photodetection and high-speed intensity modulation. Surface-normal structures are of particular interest. We also discuss recent work on exceptional point waveguides, wherein the modal evolution traces out adiabatic and anti-adiabatic parametric paths around an exceptional point, and in combination with a gain saturation nonlinearity, leads to non-reciprocity.
Conference Presentation

1.

INTRODUCTION

Metallic nanostructures such as antennas [1,2] and gratings [3-5] can be designed to operate effectively as a coupling structure for incident beams to surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) propagating or resonating thereon. On a semiconductor, such nanostructures can act simultaneously as a device electrode while ensuring strong optical field overlap with the active region. Moreover, SPP fields can be confined to sub-wavelength regions and enhanced relative to the exciting field.

These features are very attractive for application to optoelectronic devices such as in photodetectors [6-14] and modulators [15-18] because the involvement of SPPs alters conventional trade-offs between responsivity and speed, or modulation and speed, respectively. Fundamentally, sub-wavelength confinement enables the active region to be shrunk to nano-scale dimensions, while the SPP field enhancement can maintain good optoelectronic performance.

Here we discuss progress on surface plasmon enhanced photodetectors and modulators, particularly, recent proposals for a photodetectors exhibiting THz electrical bandwidths [8,9], demonstrations of sub-bandgap photodetectors on Si [12-14], and high-speed reflection modulators on Si based on the carrier refraction effect [16,17].

2.

PHOTODETECTORS

A Schottky photodiode on n-doped semiconductor is sketched in Fig. 1(a). Two detection mechanisms are frequently exploited for photodetection [6]. The first is photodetection by the creation of electron-hole pairs (EHPs) in the semiconductor due to the absorption of incident photons of energy greater than the bandgap energy of the semiconductor (hν > Eg). This mechanism involves the creation of EHPs, the separation of the EHPs by a bias field, and carrier drift/diffusion in the semiconductor. The second mechanism is photodetection by the internal photoemission (IPE) of energetic carriers excited in the metal by absorption of incident quanta. The energy band diagram sketched in Fig. 1(b), for a contact to n-doped semiconductor, further describes this 3-step process, which is comprised of the photo-excitation of carriers in the metal, transport of excited (hot) carriers with scattering toward the metal interface(s), and emission of hot carriers over the Schottky barrier into the semiconductor. IPE occurs for photon energies greater than the Schottky barrier energy ΦB and is useful to extend photodetection to photon energies below the semiconductor bandgap energy (i.e., for ΦB < hν < Eg).

Figure 1.

(a) Schottky contact on an n-doped semiconductor illuminated by a beam of photon energy . Electrons are shown as filled circles and holes by unfilled ones. (b) Energy band diagram of Schottky contact. The 3-step IPE process consists of photo-excitation of carriers in the metal, carrier transport through the metal, and carrier emission into the semiconductor (hot electrons are sketched here). EC and EV are the conduction and valence band edges, EF is the Fermi level and ΦB is the Schottky barrier height.

00071_PSISDG11031_1103107_page_2_1.jpg

2.1

Photodetectors on III-V

We propose SPP photodetectors capable of THz electrical bandwidths and high responsivity [8,9]. The photodetectors are based on the enhancement of the electric field in low-defect, low-doped In0.53Ga0.47As detection volumes located in the gaps of metal dipole nanoantennas [8], or below metal monopole nanoantennas [9]. In both cases the detection medium (InGaAs) is formed on a non-absorbing InP substrate. In the first case [8], the arms of the dipoles in the array form Schottky contacts to the InGaAs detection volumes, and are connected to independent contacts such that a punch-through bias field can be applied to the detection volumes [8]. In the second case [9], the monopole nanoantennas are similarly interconnected. Photodetection in both device concepts occurs via the creation of EHPs in the InGaAs volumes.

A maximum responsivity of ~100 mA/W at wavelengths near 1550 nm is predicted [8]. The 3 dB electrical bandwidth of the device is estimated based on its RC rise time and the hole transit time (slowest carrier) through the detection volume. Given the nano-scale length of the InGaAs detection volumes, and the possibility for ballistic transport therein, the expected electrical bandwidth ranges from ~0.7 to 4 THz. Trends relating the responsivity to the antenna dimensions are observed, highlighting a trade-off between the field-enhancement in the gap and the volume of the detection region.

2.2

Photodetectors on Si

We propose a sub-bandgap photodetector consisting of a Au grating on a thin Au film on p-Si, which exploits the enhancement associated with the excitation of SPPs at the Au/p-Si interface [13]. The grating is defined via e-beam lithography and Au lift-off, on a Au film formed beforehand by optical lithography, on p-Si. In this device, SPPs are absorbed by the Au film, leading to the creation of hot holes therein that can cross into the p-Si where they are collected as the photocurrent. Results are promising in terms of responsivity, with a value of 13 mA/W measured at 1550 nm - this is among the highest values reported to date for sub-bandgap detectors based on IPE [13]. This detector can be used in, e.g., non-contact wafer probing or in short-reach optical communications applications.

We also propose and investigate a Schottky contact detector where the contact metal is a rectangular metal nanowire supporting SPPs with strong localization at the Schottky contact [12]. We consider p-Si for the semiconductor, Au for the nanowire, operation in the infrared (λ0 ~ 1550 nm), and IPE of hot holes as the sub-bandgap detection mechanism. We find that the main SPP mode propagating along the Au nanowire exhibits mode fields that are tightly confined to the immediate vicinity of the stripe, to within a very small area. End-fire coupling efficiencies, responsivities, dark currents, and minimum detectable powers are computed [12]. We find that the structure operates as a nanoscale “point detector” and that it may be useful for optical beam scanning applications, motivated by the very small area of the photodetector nanowire mode relative to, e.g., a Gaussian beam. The nanowire field distribution approximates a Dirac delta function in comparison, and the photocurrent originates from selective absorption of the nanowire SPP mode. The proposed application was verified through numerical simulation, demonstrating that a nanoscale “point detector” can scan a tightly focused Gaussian beam (2.5 μm diameter at λ0 ~ 1550 nm) with good resolution and signal-to-noise [12].

Figure 2 shows a schematic of another structure of interest [14]. It consists of an array of monopoles (thickness t) for confining SPPs on a lightly-doped p-Si epitaxial layer on a heavily-doped p+-Si substrate. The Au monopoles are interconnected via Au lines running perpendicular to their axes through the middle of each to a common circular contact pad used to collect the photocurrent. The pad is formed of Au/Ti because Ti has a larger Schottky barrier to p-Si thereby reducing the dark current contributed by this portion of the device. The monopoles are designed to couple normally-incident p-polarised infrared (λ~1550 nm, sub-bandgap) light to SPPs propagating along their bottom surface such that the SPP fields are coincident with the Schottky contact. As SPPs propagate they are absorbed in the metal, generating hot carriers therein primarily along the Schottky contact. Detection then occurs through the collection of hot holes in p-Si via IPE. The substrate is placed on a backside Al Ohmic ground contact.

Figure 2.

Schematic of an Au/p-Si optical antenna Schottky contact diode for sub-bandgap detection. The materials used are Au for the antennas, p-Si for the epitaxial layer, p+-Si for the substrate, Au/Ti for the probing structure (pad and arm), and Al for the backside Ohmic contact. The device is illuminated from the top with p-polarised IR light aligned along monopole lengths. A good design of length 125 nm, width 44 nm and thickness 20 nm produces a resonant wavelength at λ = 1534 nm as identified from the computed absorptance response in inset.

00071_PSISDG11031_1103107_page_3_1.jpg

The structures were fabricated using a combination of photolithography and e-beam lithography, the former to define the large Au/Ti probing features, and the latter to define the Au nanoantennas and interconnect lines. Figs. 3(a) - 3(d) show scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of fabricated structures [14]. The metal thickness and roughness were deduced from atomic force microscope (AFM) scans of the antenna array, as shown in Fig. 5(e), revealing a thickness of ~ 17 nm with a root mean square (RMS) roughness of 1 nm for each monopole (design target = 20 nm). All other dimensions are well in keeping with the target ones.

Figure 3.

(a)-(d) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of fabricated structures. (a) View of a full structure comprising a bilayer Au/Ti probing structure and an array of Au electrically-contacted monopole antennas. (b) and (c) Higher-magnification images of arrays. (d) Higher-magnification image of electrically-contacted monopole antennas. (e) Atomic force microscope image of electrically-contacted monopole antennas.

00071_PSISDG11031_1103107_page_4_1.jpg

A photodetector under test was biased by probing its probe pad and grounding its Al contact using a source meter (Fig. 2). A cleaved polarisation-maintaining single-mode fibre (PM-SMF) was used to excite the photodetector under test from the top. The fibre was manipulated using a six-axis micro-positioner. A tunable external cavity laser was used to generate the incident light at λ ~ 1550 nm. The laser was thermally stabilized and linearly polarized, with the polarisation aligned along the slow axis of the PM-SMF. The setup was placed on a vibration isolation optical table and shielded from background light. Instrument control and data acquisition were performed via computer using LabVIEW (SP1 2013)]. The optical power incident on a photodetector was determined by removing the losses of all the elements in the input path of the setup.

The p-polarized photocurrent response was measured at normal incidence with Pinc = 1.6 mW and VB = –10 mV for two detectors having arrays of monopoles of different dimensions. Each monopole in both arrays were ~45 nm wide and 17 nm thick, but the shorter ones were ~124 nm long and the longer ones were 130 nm long. Two wavelength dependencies were observed on each response [14]. A rapidly varying dependency come from Fabry-Perot resonances as light transmitted through the array propagates through the semi-transparent substrate (p+-Si) and is reflected from the backside Ohmic contact. The second wavelength dependency was a slow one produced by the monopole resonance, where it was observed that increasing the monopole length, red-shifts the resonance wavelength, as expected [14].

3.

MODULATORS

We propose a plasmonic surface that produces an electrically-controlled reflectance as a high-speed optical intensity reflection modulator [16,17]. The device is conceived as a metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitor on silicon with its metal nanostructured as a thin patch bearing a contiguous nanoscale grating. The metal structure serves multiple functions: as a driving electrode, as a grating coupler for perpendicularly-incident p-polarised light to surface plasmons, and as a waveguide for supporting SPPs on the underside of the patch.

Modulation is produced by charging and discharging the capacitor and exploiting the carrier refraction effect in Si along with the high sensitivity of strongly confined SPPs to refractive index perturbations in Si. The area of the modulator is set by the area of the incident beam, leading to a very compact device for a strongly-focused beam (~2.5 μm dia.).

The modulator can operate over a broad electrical bandwidth with a modulation depth of 3 to 6%, a loss of 3 to 4 dB, and an optical bandwidth of ~50 nm. About 1000 modulators can be integrated and excited independently over a 50 mm2 area producing an aggregate electro-optic modulation rate in excess of 1 Tb/s - Fig. 4(a). We demonstrate modulators operating at telecommunications wavelengths, fabricated as nanostructured Au/HfO2/p-Si capacitors - Fig. 4(b) [16,17].

Figure 4.

(a) Optical microscope image of modulators of varying grating period. Each colour spot corresponds to one modulator. The area shown is about 100 mm2 and contains ~1700 modulators. (b) Optical modulation traces measured with an oscilloscope for Au/HfO2/p-Si MOS modulators driven at about 1 V.

00071_PSISDG11031_1103107_page_5_1.jpg

Applications such as short-reach data communications, massively-parallel data output for optical interconnects to chips, and functional wafer probing for compliance testing post-manufacturing are envisaged. Packaging is simplified because butt-coupling and propagation through end-facets are not required, and simpler packages suitable for surface devices can be used. The modulators break conceptually from waveguide-based devices, belonging to the same class of devices as surface photodetectors and vertical cavity surface-emitting lasers.

4.

EXCEPTIONAL POINT WAVEGUIDES

Synthetic optical materials having a carefully-structured complex refractive index distribution, following non-Hermitian Hamiltonian analogs, have attracted significant attention because of their interesting optical behaviour [19]. Such materials enable functions such as uni-directionality and unconventional beam dynamics.

The interplay between gain and loss, especially in low-loss (long-range) plasmonic systems is interesting because parity-time (PT) symmetric and exceptional point systems become readily accessible, leading to practical experimental demonstrations. Plasmonic waveguide Bragg gratings incorporating structured and unstructured gain media, enabling distributed feedback lasing [20] and single-sided reflection [21] are of particular interest, as are single-sided diffraction gratings implemented as a holographic lattice that transitions through the exceptional point [22].

Interactions based on encircling-an-exceptional-point, which are reciprocal in the linear regime, may become nonreciprocal in the nonlinear regime over a very broad optical bandwidth (limited mainly by the bandwidth of the nonlinearity) [23]. Recent experiments in passive Si-based optical waveguides confirm modal evolution that trace out adiabatic and anti-adiabatic parametric paths around an exceptional point [24].

5.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Metal nanoantenna arrays and gratings are effective as metasurfaces for coupling broadside incident beams to SPPs. Such surfaces allow the excitation of SPPs with strongly enhanced fields in very small sub-wavelength active volumes and in combination with a semiconductor active region, lead to compelling devices and applications. Field enhancement allows good optoelectronic performance to be achieved in a small active volume which then leads to fast photodetectors and modulators. These points were made and discussed, and several metasurface optoelectronic devices presented: A modulator based on a silicon MOS structure incorporating a metal grating on a metal film; and photodetectors based on metal dipole and monopole arrays on III-V, on a grating on a metal film on Si, and on a nanowire on Si. In all cases, the metallic nanostructures were also used as device electrodes, either to collect photocurrent current or drive the device. We also discussed recent work on exceptional point waveguides, wherein the modal evolution traces out adiabatic and anti-adiabatic parametric paths around an exceptional point, and in combination with a gain saturation nonlinearity, leads to non-reciprocity.

REFERENCES

[1] 

P. Bharadwaj, B. Deutsch and L. Novotny, “Optical antennas,” Adv. Opt. Photon., 1 438 –483 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.1.000438 Google Scholar

[2] 

S. Siadat Mousavi, P. Berini, and D. McNamara, “Periodic plasmonic nanoantennas in a piecewise homogeneous background,” Optics Express, 20 18044 –18065 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.018044 Google Scholar

[3] 

G. Lévêque, and O. J. F. Martin, “Optimization of finite diffraction gratings for the excitation of surface plasmons,” J. Appl. Phys., 100 124301 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2401025 Google Scholar

[4] 

I. P. Radko, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, G. Brucoli, L. Martín-Moreno, F. J. García-Vidal, and A. Boltasseva, “Efficient unidirectional ridge excitation of surface plasmons,” Opt. Express, 17 7228 –7232 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.007228 Google Scholar

[5] 

N. Fong, P. Berini, and R. N. Tait, “Characterization of Grating-Coupled Long Range Surface Plasmon Polariton Membrane Waveguides,” Optics Express, 23 17421 –17430 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.017421 Google Scholar

[6] 

P. Berini, “Surface Plasmon Photodetectors and their Applications,” Lasers & Photonics Reviews, 8 197 –220 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201300019 Google Scholar

[7] 

M. L. Brongersma, N. J. Halas, and P. Nordlander, “Plasmon-induced hot carrier science and technology,” Nat. Nanotechnol., 10 25 –34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.311 Google Scholar

[8] 

S. Siadat Mousavi, A. Stöhr, and P. Berini, “Plasmonic photodetector with terahertz electrical bandwidth,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 104 143112 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4870974 Google Scholar

[9] 

S. Siadat Mousavi, A. Stöhr, P. Berini, “Ultra-fast Surface Plasmon III-V Photodetectors Based on Nanomonopoles,” J. Lightw. Technol., 34 4682 –4687 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2016.2575002 Google Scholar

[10] 

M. W. Knight, H. Sobhani, P. Nordlander, and N. J. Halas, “Photodetection with active optical antennas,” Science, 332 702 –704 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203056 Google Scholar

[11] 

I. Goykhman, B. Desiatov, J. Khurgin, J. Shappir, and U. Levy, “Waveguide based compact silicon Schottky photodetector with enhanced responsivity in the telecom spectral band,” Opt. Express, 20 28594 –28602 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.028594 Google Scholar

[12] 

N. Othman, P, Berini, “Nanoscale Schottky contact surface plasmon point detectors for optical beam scanning applications,” Appl. Opt., 56 3329 –3334 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.003329 Google Scholar

[13] 

M. Alavirad, A. Olivieri, L. Roy, P. Berini, “High-responsivity sub-bandgap hot-hole plasmonic Schottky detectors,” Optics Express, 24 22544 –22554 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.022544 Google Scholar

[14] 

M. Alavirad, A. Olivieri, L. Roy, P. Berini, “Fabrication of electrically contacted plasmonic Schottky nanoantennas on silicon,” Chinese Optics Letters, 16 050007 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3788/COL Google Scholar

[15] 

J. A. Dionne, K. Diest, L. A. Sweatlock and H. A. Atwater, “A metal–oxide–Si field effect plasmonic modulator,” Nano Lett., 9 897 –902 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl803868k Google Scholar

[16] 

S. Hassan, E. Lisicka-Skrzek, A. Olivieri, R. N. Tait, P. Berini, “Fabrication of a plasmonic modulator incorporating an overlaid grating coupler,” Nanotechnology, 25 495202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/49/495202 Google Scholar

[17] 

A. Olivieri, C. Chen, S. Hassan, E. Lisicka-Skrzek, R. N. Tait, P. Berini, “Plasmonic Nanostructured Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor Reflection Modulators,” Nano Lett., 15 2304 –2311 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl504389f Google Scholar

[18] 

P. Berini, R. Charbonneau, S. Jetté-Charbonneau, N. Lahoud, G. Mattiussi, “Long-range surface plasmon-polariton waveguides and devices in lithium niobate,” J. Appl. Phys., 101 113114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2739300 Google Scholar

[19] 

R. El-Ganainy, K. G Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, D. N. Christodoulides, “Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry,” Nature Photonics, 14 11 (2017). Google Scholar

[20] 

E. Karami Keshmarzi, R. N. Tait, and P. Berini, “Single-mode surface plasmon distributed feedback lasers,” Nanoscale, 10 5914 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR09183D Google Scholar

[21] 

C. Hahn, E. Karami Keshmarzi, S. H. Song, C. H. Oh, N. Tait, P. Berini, “Unidirectional Bragg Gratings Using Parity-Time Symmetry Breaking in Plasmonic Systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electr., 22 4600712 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2519825 Google Scholar

[22] 

C. Hahn, Y. Choi, J. W. Yoon, S. H. Song, C. H. Oh, P. Berini, “Observation of exceptional points in reconfigurable non-Hermitian vector-field holographic lattices,” Nature Communications, 7 12201 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12201 Google Scholar

[23] 

Y. Choi, C. Hahn, J. W. Yoon, S. H. Song and P. Berini, “Extremely broadband, on-chip optical nonreciprocity enabled by mimicking nonlinear anti-adiabatic quantum jumps near exceptional points,” Nature Communications, 8 14154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14154 Google Scholar

[24] 

J. W. Yoon, Y. Choi, C. Hahn, G. Kim, S. H. Song, K.-Y. Yang, J. Y. Lee, Y. Kim, C. S. Lee, J. K. Shin, H.-S. Lee, P. Berini, “Time-asymmetric loop around an exceptional point over the full optical communications band,” Nature, 562 7725 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0523-2 Google Scholar
© (2019) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Pierre Berini "Surface plasmon optoelectronics and exceptional point waveguides on silicon", Proc. SPIE 11031, Integrated Optics: Design, Devices, Systems, and Applications V, 1103107 (26 April 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2524502
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photodetectors

Metals

Modulators

Silicon

Semiconductors

Gold

Waveguides

RELATED CONTENT

Plasmonic optoelectronics on silicon
Proceedings of SPIE (September 10 2014)
Surface plasmon enhanced optoelectronics
Proceedings of SPIE (September 25 2014)
Surface plasmon photodetectors
Proceedings of SPIE (May 06 2013)
Surface plasmon detectors on silicon
Proceedings of SPIE (May 01 2012)

Back to Top