Comparison of interferometer and d’nanoimager for profiling large objects (Conference Presentation)

Dingfu Chen; Yingjie Yu; Jianfei Sun; Prathan Buranasiri; Sutha Sutthiruangwong; Thanthanat Srisuwan; Anand Asundi

doi:10.1117/12.2524704

10 September 2019 Comparison of interferometer and d’nanoimager for profiling large objects (Conference Presentation)

Dingfu Chen, Yingjie Yu, Jianfei Sun, Prathan Buranasiri, Sutha Sutthiruangwong, Thanthanat Srisuwan, Anand Asundi

Proceedings Volume 11102, Applied Optical Metrology III; 111020J (2019) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2524704
Event: SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, 2019, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

Recovering the phase of radiation is of general interest in material and biomedical science, and in nanotechnology. Commercial interferometers have been widely used in a variety of applications, if equipped with a spatial light modulator or a computer generate hologram, theoretically the interferometer can measure a variety of surface objects. At present, the new non-interferometric quantitative phase recovery method based on Transport of Intensity Equations (TIE) is widely used in the field of microstructure measurement and bioimaging. Compared with interferometric measurement, the Transport of Intensity Equations does not need additional reference light, and has good ability of anti-vibration. In this paper, the ubiquitous interferometer and the new d’Nanoimager based on the Transport of Intensity Equations (TIE) are compared with respect to measuring larger objects of different profiles. These two methods are compared with respect of their accuracy and resolution of measurement and speed of acquiring data and other experimental consideration. In addition, a large number of subjects are selected for specific applications include flat surface such as the display screen of smartphones, to lens testing both spherical and cylindrical lenses and specific application such as corrosion pitting of aluminum disks. The comparative advantages and dis-advantages of the two methods are explored, as well as their application.

Conference Presentation

Citation Download Citation

Dingfu Chen, Yingjie Yu, Jianfei Sun, Prathan Buranasiri, Sutha Sutthiruangwong, Thanthanat Srisuwan, and Anand Asundi "Comparison of interferometer and d’nanoimager for profiling large objects (Conference Presentation)", Proc. SPIE 11102, Applied Optical Metrology III, 111020J (10 September 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2524704

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
PRESENTATION

WATCH
PRESENTATION SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

KEYWORDS

Interferometers

Profiling

Biomedical optics

Corrosion

Cylindrical lenses

Holograms

Holographic interferometry

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years