Translator Disclaimer
Presentation + Paper
6 September 2019 Performance comparison of VVC, AV1 and EVC
Author Affiliations +
This paper presents a study comparing the coding efficiency performance of three video codecs: (a) the Versatile Video Coding (VVC); (b) AV1 codec of the Alliance for Open Media (AOM); and (c) the MPEG-5 Essential Video Coding (EVC). Two approaches to coding were used: (i) constant quality (QP) for VVC, AV1, EVC; and (ii) target bit rate (VBR) for AV1. Constant quality encoding is performed with all the three codecs for an unbiased comparison of the core coding tools. Whereas, target bitrate coding is done with the AV1 codec to study the compression efficiency achieved with rate control, which can and does have a significant impact. Performance is tabulated for on two fronts: (1) objective performance based on PSNR’s and (2) informal subjective assessment. Our general conclusion derived from the assessment of objective metrics and subjective evaluation is that VVC appears to be superior to AV1 and EVC under both constant quality and target bitrate coding. However, relative to currently popular codecs such as AVC and HEVC, that difference is modest.
Conference Presentation
© (2019) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Pankaj Topiwala, Madhu Krishnan, and Wei Dai "Performance comparison of VVC, AV1 and EVC", Proc. SPIE 11137, Applications of Digital Image Processing XLII, 1113715 (6 September 2019);


Performance comparison of VVC, AV1, and HEVC on 8 bit...
Proceedings of SPIE (September 17 2018)
QBIX-G: a transcoding multimedia proxy
Proceedings of SPIE (January 16 2006)
MPEG to H.264 transcoding
Proceedings of SPIE (November 02 2004)
DIVA: a MPEG1 video decoder for interactive applications
Proceedings of SPIE (October 29 1993)
Multistage mode decision for intraprediction in H.264 codec
Proceedings of SPIE (January 18 2004)

Back to Top