You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
7 October 2019Analysis of the controllers of the vessel course control systems in difficult navigation conditions
The article presents a comparison of a few controllers of the vessel's course. The mathematical model of the vessel was set as a transfer function with variable coefficients, which depend on vessel speed. We compared a classic PID controller, a PID controller with self-adjusting coefficients, an adaptive controller with implicit reference model, and an adaptive fuzzy controller. In the result of comparison the adaptive fuzzy controller demonstrated the best quality indicators in comparison with other controllers by set of criteria that allows to recommend this controller for implementation in the vessel's course control systems.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Vladimir V. Ignatyev, Viktor V. Soloviev, Alexandra S. Ignatyeva, Anton S. Boldyreff, "Analysis of the controllers of the vessel course control systems in difficult navigation conditions," Proc. SPIE 11169, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Defense Applications, 111690U (7 October 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2554412