Paper
27 June 2019 MPC model sensitivity analysis: model ambit vs. correction runtime
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Mask Process Correction (MPC) is becoming increasingly relevant as the industry moves toward more challenging technology nodes. Because running MPC on large layouts can be extremely resource intensive, it is important to strike a balance between the quality of the correction and the total turnaround time (TAT). This paper describes the results of applying a geometry-based MPC solution to a mask lithography process created at Toppan where the model is calibrated from AEI metrology data of patterns that accounts for beam blur, etch, and proximity effects present in the etched mask up to ~1 um. In this solution, the model calibration can result in different but equivalent predictors, i.e., the model parameters can differ while the overall error residuals (model RMS) can be nearly identical. The following sections probe a possible trade-off between correction quality and speed by testing how an MPC software based on edge movement behaves as the effective range of an enhanced multi-Gaussian mask model template is constrained.
© (2019) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Alex Zepka, John Valadez, Parikshit Kulkarni, Kohei Yanagisawa, Kota Kobayashi, and Kiyoshi Kageyama "MPC model sensitivity analysis: model ambit vs. correction runtime", Proc. SPIE 11178, Photomask Japan 2019: XXVI Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology, 1117808 (27 June 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2535707
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

Data modeling

Calibration

Metrology

Etching

Electrons

Cadmium

Back to Top