A comparative analysis between heterogeneously coupled Stranski-Krastanov (SK) on Submonolayer (SML) and Submonolayer (SML) on Stranski-Krastanov (SK) quantum dot heterostructures

Samishta Choudhary; Jhuma Saha; Debiprasad Panda; Debabrata Das; Subhananda Chakrabarti

doi:10.1117/12.2546336

2 March 2020 A comparative analysis between heterogeneously coupled Stranski-Krastanov (SK) on Submonolayer (SML) and Submonolayer (SML) on Stranski-Krastanov (SK) quantum dot heterostructures

Samishta Choudhary, Jhuma Saha, Debiprasad Panda, Debabrata Das, Subhananda Chakrabarti

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 11291, Quantum Dots, Nanostructures, and Quantum Materials: Growth, Characterization, and Modeling XVII; 112910Y (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2546336
Event: SPIE OPTO, 2020, San Francisco, California, United States

Abstract

Heterogeneously coupled SK-SMLQuantum Dot (QD) heterostructures has superior characteristics compared to homogeneously coupled SK QDs in terms of dot density, cumulative strain and absorption efficiency. Here, we have carried out a comparative analysis between heterogeneously coupled SK on SML and SML on SK QDs heterostructures. The barrier thickness between SK and SML QDs, in both structures, has been varied as 5, 7.5 and 10 nm. The tunnelling of carriers from one type of QD (SK/SML) to another type of QD (SML/SK)has been explicated through photoluminescence (PL) study. The appearance of SML peak along with the SK peak for higher barrier thickness has been observed in case of SK on SML QD heterostructure. This might be due to decrease in tunnelling probability of carriers and thereby, transition takes place from both SK and SML QDs. However, this phenomenon has not been observed in SML on SK QD heterostructures. The reason might be the reduced average barrier thickness between SML and SK QDs, which allowed tunnelling of all the carriers. Thus, SML peak was absent in all three SML on SK QD heterostructures. Moreover, strain distribution in all the heterostructures have been investigated through high resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD) measurements. The significant modification in structural morphology of QDs, can be obtained fromHRXRD, clearly demonstrates variation in strain with respect to barrier thickness. This comparative analysis would help the research community to choose the optimized heterostructure for desired optoelectronic applications.

Citation Download Citation

Samishta Choudhary, Jhuma Saha, Debiprasad Panda, Debabrata Das, and Subhananda Chakrabarti "A comparative analysis between heterogeneously coupled Stranski-Krastanov (SK) on Submonolayer (SML) and Submonolayer (SML) on Stranski-Krastanov (SK) quantum dot heterostructures", Proc. SPIE 11291, Quantum Dots, Nanostructures, and Quantum Materials: Growth, Characterization, and Modeling XVII, 112910Y (2 March 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2546336

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
6 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Heterojunctions

Gallium arsenide

Indium arsenide

Quantum dots

Optoelectronics

Quantum wells

X-ray diffraction

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years