Determining the optimal angular range of the x-ray source motion in tomosynthesis using virtual clinical trials

Bruno Barufaldi; Trevor L. Vent; Raymond J. Acciavatti; Predrag R. Bakic; Peter B. Noël; Emily F. Conant; Andrew D. A. Maidment

doi:10.1117/12.2549600

16 March 2020 Determining the optimal angular range of the x-ray source motion in tomosynthesis using virtual clinical trials

Bruno Barufaldi, Trevor L. Vent, Raymond J. Acciavatti, Predrag R. Bakic, Peter B. Noël, Emily F. Conant, Andrew D. A. Maidment

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 11312, Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging; 113120I (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549600
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2020, Houston, Texas, United States

Abstract

The limited angle and limited number of projections in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) produce under-sampled datasets that may compromise calcification detection. Small breast lesions, such as microcalcifications, may not be discernible without sufficient sampling in the reconstructed DBT images. We propose a virtual clinical trial (VCT) method to evaluate the calcification detection in DBT using computer simulations of breast phantoms, images, and virtual readers. We used multiple-reader multiple-case (MRMC) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to evaluate the performance of channelized Hotelling observers (CHOs) in calcification detection. The angular motion path of the x-ray source was varied to simulate different DBT acquisition geometries. We simulated continuous and step-and-shoot x-ray source motion and three angular motion paths: ±7.5°, ±15°, and ±25°. The detection of calcifications is affected by the angular motion path, particularly for the ±25° angular range, combined with continuous tube motion, larger detector element sizes (0.14 mm) and larger reconstructed voxel sizes (0.10 mm). When an angular range of ±25° is compared to ±7.5°, the difference in the area under the curve (AUC) is -0.030 (d’ ratio=0.633) and -0.067 (d’ ratio=0.584), for one and two- voxel calcifications (0.1 mm³ and 0.2 mm³), respectively. There is no significant difference in calcification detection using images acquired with ±7.5° and ±15°. The results provide insight on the impact of angular range for calcification detection, an ongoing limitation of tomosynthesis.

Citation Download Citation

Bruno Barufaldi, Trevor L. Vent, Raymond J. Acciavatti, Predrag R. Bakic, Peter B. Noël, Emily F. Conant, and Andrew D. A. Maidment "Determining the optimal angular range of the x-ray source motion in tomosynthesis using virtual clinical trials", Proc. SPIE 11312, Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging, 113120I (16 March 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549600

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
7 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Digital breast tomosynthesis

X-ray sources

Breast

Sensors

Clinical trials

Virtual reality

Computer simulations

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years