20 December 1989 The Scratch Standard Is Only A Cosmetic Standard
Author Affiliations +
In this paper, I present a history of the scratch-and-dig standard for optical surface quality and show that this standard has since its inception been recognized as a cosmetic standard and not as an objective or performance standard. In addition, I attempt to dispel the myth that the scratch standard was changed during the 1960's and show that scratch number cannot be related to scratch width. Finally, I describe a preliminary aging experiment that suggests that the scratch standards have not aged with time and are, in fact, extremely stable.
© (1989) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Matt Young, Matt Young, } "The Scratch Standard Is Only A Cosmetic Standard", Proc. SPIE 1164, Surface Characterization and Testing II, (20 December 1989); doi: 10.1117/12.962822; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.962822


Virtual image superposing comparator
Proceedings of SPIE (May 28 1993)
Scratches: At What Price Quality
Proceedings of SPIE (November 17 1986)
Tunable Scratch Standards
Proceedings of SPIE (September 03 1985)

Back to Top