Presentation + Paper
13 June 2023 Analysis of LiDAR configurations on off-road semantic segmentation performance
Jinhee Yu, Jingdao Chen, Lalitha Dabbiru, Christopher T. Goodin
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
LiDAR-based 3D semantic segmentation is one of the most widely used perception methods to support scene understanding of self-driving vehicles. Most publicly available LiDAR datasets for driving scene segmentation, such as SemanticKITTI, nuScenes, and SemanticPOSS, provide only a single type of LiDAR configuration. Therefore, testing a trained model with a different channel configuration than the training dataset is sometimes inevitable in real-world applications. Despite the significance of this LiDAR channel mismatch problem in the machine learning pipeline, little research has focused on investigating the impact of the LiDAR configuration shift on a model’s test performance. This paper aims to provide referenceable baseline experiments for the LiDAR configuration shifts. We explore the effect of using different LiDAR channels when training and testing a 3D LiDAR point cloud semantic segmentation model, utilizing Cylinder3D for the experiments. A Cylinder3D model is trained and tested on simulated 3D LiDAR point cloud datasets created using the Mississippi State University Autonomous Vehicle Simulator (MAVS) and 32, 64 channel 3D LiDAR point clouds of the RELLIS-3D dataset collected in a real-world off-road environment. Our experimental results demonstrate that sensor and spatial domain shifts significantly impact the performance of LiDAR-based semantic segmentation models. In the absence of spatial domain changes between training and testing, models trained and tested on the same sensor type generally exhibited better performance. Moreover, higher-resolution sensors showed improved performance compared to those with lower-resolution ones. However, results varied when spatial domain changes were present. In some cases, the advantage of a sensor’s higher resolution led to better performance both with and without sensor domain shifts. In other instances, the higher resolution resulted in overfitting within a specific domain, causing a lack of generalization capability and decreased performance when tested on data with different sensor configurations.
Conference Presentation
© (2023) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Jinhee Yu, Jingdao Chen, Lalitha Dabbiru, and Christopher T. Goodin "Analysis of LiDAR configurations on off-road semantic segmentation performance", Proc. SPIE 12540, Autonomous Systems: Sensors, Processing, and Security for Ground, Air, Sea, and Space Vehicles and Infrastructure 2023, 1254003 (13 June 2023); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2663098
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
LIDAR

Sensors

Semantics

Computer simulations

Point clouds

Machine learning

Back to Top