1 December 1991 Comparison of synthetic-aperture radar autofocus techniques: phase gradient versus subaperture
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Two methods of focusing synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are compared. Both a conventional subaperture cross-correlation method and a new phase gradient autofocus (PGA) algorithm developed at Sandia National Laboratories are shown to perform well if high-order phase errors are not present. With the introduction of significant high-order phase errors [e.g., due to uncompensated platform motion], both algorithms suffer a loss in performance. However, relative performance degradation is less for PGA than for the subaperture focusing technique. An explanation is presented for the observed behavior of the two autofocus techniques.
© (1991) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Terry M. Calloway, Terry M. Calloway, Charles V. Jakowatz, Charles V. Jakowatz, Paul A. Thompson, Paul A. Thompson, Paul H. Eichel, Paul H. Eichel, } "Comparison of synthetic-aperture radar autofocus techniques: phase gradient versus subaperture", Proc. SPIE 1566, Advanced Signal Processing Algorithms, Architectures, and Implementations II, (1 December 1991); doi: 10.1117/12.49837; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.49837
PROCEEDINGS
12 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top