1 January 1992 Reticle defect sizing and printability
Author Affiliations +
As reticle defect specifications become more stringent and maximum allowable defect sizes approach the resolution of current defect inspection systems, the mask fabricator1s ability to accurately determine the size of these defects becomes limited. We have evaluated several techniques by which the size of reticle defects can be measured and have found significant discrepancies between techniques. Using a standard defect inspection system, we measured defects at or below 1.0 ^m and found that the results varied with each technique. Defects were sized using both reflected and transmitted light and the results were compared to SEM measurements. The reflected-light measurements best correlated with the SEM measurements, which are considered more accurate. The results of this study indicated that current sizing techniques are inaccurate. A printability evaluation was also performed using a mask with accurately sized defects. Defect printability results were evaluated in terms of their effect on linewidth.
© (1992) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Brian J. Grenon, Brian J. Grenon, Karen D. Badger, Karen D. Badger, Michael J. Trybendis, Michael J. Trybendis, } "Reticle defect sizing and printability", Proc. SPIE 1604, 11th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, (1 January 1992); doi: 10.1117/12.56943; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.56943


Printability of 2D mask quality
Proceedings of SPIE (December 16 2003)
Reticle defects on optical proximity correction features
Proceedings of SPIE (August 31 1998)
SEMATECH J111 project: OPC validation
Proceedings of SPIE (June 28 1998)

Back to Top