Paper
9 July 1992 Why bother with x-ray lithography?
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The manufacture of state-of-the-art integrated circuits uses UV optical projection lithography. Conventional wisdom (i.e., the trade journals) holds that this technology will take the industry to quarter-micrometer minimum features sizes and below. So, why bother with X-ray lithography? The reason is that lithography is a 'system problem', and proximity X-ray lithography is better matched to that system problem than any other technology, once the initial investment is surmounted. X-ray lithography offers the most cost-effective path to the future of ultra-large-scale integrated circuits with feature sizes of tenth micrometer and below (i.e., gigascale electronics and quantum-effect electronics).
© (1992) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Henry I. Smith and Mark L. Schattenburg "Why bother with x-ray lithography?", Proc. SPIE 1671, Electron-Beam, X-Ray, and Ion-Beam Submicrometer Lithographies for Manufacturing II, (9 July 1992); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.136013
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 8 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

X-ray lithography

Optical lithography

Manufacturing

Distortion

X-rays

Lithography

RELATED CONTENT

Fabrication of 1-Mbit DRAMs By Using X-Ray Lithography
Proceedings of SPIE (August 01 1989)
Optic And X-Ray Lithographies In 1990's
Proceedings of SPIE (November 07 1983)
Cost-effective x-ray lithography
Proceedings of SPIE (August 01 1991)
Present status and technical issues of x-ray lithography
Proceedings of SPIE (September 01 1998)
X-Ray Lithography: Technology For The 1980s
Proceedings of SPIE (June 30 1982)
Cost of ownership for x-ray proximity lithography
Proceedings of SPIE (May 13 1994)

Back to Top