Paper
26 March 1993 Rational argument for the impracticability of 1× reticles
Gerry Owen, Roger Fabian W. Pease, Nadim I. Maluf, Robert L. Hsieh, Jun Ye, C. Neil Berglund
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Even at 0.5 micrometers design rules, the specifications on 5X reticles are set extremely tightly, on the grounds that ULSI patterns are so complex that tight specifications are essential to obtain acceptable yield. It is usually assumed that these specifications scale with the design rules, and that they should be even tighter for 1X reticles. As a consequence, it has been argued that 1X reticles for 0.25 micrometers design rules are impracticable. A statistical analysis, starting from first principles, and assuming point independent, normally distributed errors, supports the way in which mask specifications are currently set. The assumptions of spatial invariance and normal distribution are crucially important in the analysis. However, it is far from clear that they are valid. Consequently, mask specifications in general, as they are currently set, may be unnecessarily severe.
© (1993) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Gerry Owen, Roger Fabian W. Pease, Nadim I. Maluf, Robert L. Hsieh, Jun Ye, and C. Neil Berglund "Rational argument for the impracticability of 1× reticles", Proc. SPIE 1809, 12th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology and Management, (26 March 1993); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.142149
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 2 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

Reticles

Error analysis

Statistical analysis

Semiconducting wafers

Mask making

Printing

Back to Top