You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
11 May 1994Image processing of storage phosphor musculoskeletal radiographs: a comparison of the AGFA and Fuji bone algorithms
Storage phosphor radiography of the musculoskeletal system offers significant advantages for most potential diseases of the skeleton. Proper use of the system is however essential if its value is to equal or exceed that of conventional screen film radiography. There are two competing storage phosphor imaging commercial systems currently designed to accommodate musculoskeletal images. The Fuji and the AGFA systems. The image processing methods for the Fuji and AGFA machines differ substantially from each other and there are advantages and disadvantages of each system.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Martha C. Nelson M.D., Matthew T. Freedman M.D., Einar V. Pe, Shih-Chung Benedict Lo, Donald V. Smith M.D., Robert G. Leckie, Seong Ki Mun, "Image processing of storage phosphor musculoskeletal radiographs: a comparison of the AGFA and Fuji bone algorithms," Proc. SPIE 2167, Medical Imaging 1994: Image Processing, (11 May 1994); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.175125