1 June 1994 Nonuniformity of CCDs and the effects of spatial undersampling
Author Affiliations +
CCDs are widely used in astronomy for spectroscopy, photometry, astrometry, and many other applications. This array sensor has a periodic structure which defines individual picture elements (pixels). The stability and excellent overall response of this type of detector are well known. Less widely described is the fact that the internal structure of the array gives rise to intrapixel variations in responsivity. These response modulations are particularly relevant when the data is spatially undersampled; a situation that is not entirely uncommon in certain instruments. We have made detailed measurements of the response variations within CCDs, using an experimental arrangement that gave a 2 micron resolution. Optical response has been determined at all sample points within a pixel, at selected wavelengths in the range 400 to 900 nm. Measurements are presented for front-illuminated thick (EEV) devices and backside- illuminated thin (Tek) CCDs. Models of the internal structure have been constructed and used to calculate theoretical response data; these have been compared with the experimental results. An example of an extracted (FOS) spectrum which demonstrates these undersampling effects is discussed.
© (1994) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Paul R. Jorden, J.-M. Deltorn, Anthony Patrick Oates, "Nonuniformity of CCDs and the effects of spatial undersampling", Proc. SPIE 2198, Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII, (1 June 1994); doi: 10.1117/12.176783; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.176783


CCDs for future x-ray astronomy missions
Proceedings of SPIE (October 15 1997)
State Of The Art In Visible Spectrum Solid-State Imagers
Proceedings of SPIE (April 24 1987)
MOS CCDs for the EPIC on XMM
Proceedings of SPIE (October 31 1996)
3.2 million pixel full frame true 2 phase CCD image...
Proceedings of SPIE (May 15 2000)
The Hubble CCDs: lessons learned
Proceedings of SPIE (August 25 2005)

Back to Top