21 December 1995 Comparison of two manipulator designs for laparoscopic surgery
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 2351, Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies; (1995) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197308
Event: Photonics for Industrial Applications, 1994, Boston, MA, United States
Two kinematically dissimilar robots for laparoscopic surgery have been designed and built through a collaborative effort between IBM Research and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. The two mechanisms represent two distinct design approaches and a number of different engineering design decisions. In this paper we describe the mechanical design and kinematic structure of the two robots and report on the results of laboratory evaluations of the two mechanisms. The two systems are compared in terms of safety, ergonomics, ease of control, accuracy, and mechanical stiffness. In each of the categories we attempt to separate the impact of the particular design decisions made in the construction of each mechanism from the more general issue of the fundamental potential and limitations of each of the design approaches towards satisfying the particular design criterion. Based on our experience, we offer some conclusions and recommendations regarding the design of surgical robots for laparoscopy.
© (1995) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Janez Funda, B. N. Eldridge, Kreg Gruben, Steve Gomory, Russell H. Taylor, "Comparison of two manipulator designs for laparoscopic surgery", Proc. SPIE 2351, Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, (21 December 1995); doi: 10.1117/12.197308; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197308


Optimal motion control for teleoperated surgical robots
Proceedings of SPIE (December 21 1993)
Laparoscopic telesurgical workstation
Proceedings of SPIE (June 05 1998)
Teleoperated mobile robotics instructional laboratory
Proceedings of SPIE (May 04 1993)
Does a robotic scrub nurse improve economy of movements?
Proceedings of SPIE (February 17 2012)

Back to Top