22 May 1995 Reevaluation of the accuracy of NIST photmask linewidth standards
Author Affiliations +
Every artifact measurement standard has some uncertainty associated with its calibration, and the NIST Photomask Linewidth Standards are no exception. The methods of estimating measurement uncertainty, however, and the interpretation of its meaning, have been subjects of discussion for many years. The International organization for Standardization (ISO) has recently published a Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, which outlines an operational procedure for estimating and combining the effects of the various contributing factors. A new NIST policy on measurement uncertainty has led to a change in the method of determining the uncertainty of NIST Photomask Linewidth Standards to comply with ISO recommendations. Consequently, their calibration uncertainty has changed. The new method of evaluating systematic components leads to increased systematic uncertainty, and the new method of combining uncertainty components leads to reduced calibration uncertainty. This paper describes the old and new methods and compares their results.
© (1995) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
James E. Potzick, James E. Potzick, } "Reevaluation of the accuracy of NIST photmask linewidth standards", Proc. SPIE 2439, Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control IX, (22 May 1995); doi: 10.1117/12.209206; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.209206


Photomask linewidth comparison by PTB and NIST
Proceedings of SPIE (November 01 2015)
New NIST photomask linewidth standard
Proceedings of SPIE (December 26 2002)
Updated NIST photomask linewidth standard
Proceedings of SPIE (June 01 2003)
Accuracy and traceability in dimensional measurements
Proceedings of SPIE (June 07 1998)

Back to Top