11 April 1996 Physical measures of image quality in mammography
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 2708, Medical Imaging 1996: Physics of Medical Imaging; (1996); doi: 10.1117/12.237781
Event: Medical Imaging 1996, 1996, Newport Beach, CA, United States
Abstract
A recently introduced method for quantitative analysis of images of the American College of Radiology (ACR) mammography accreditation phantom has been extended to include signal- to-noise-ratio (SNR) measurements, and has been applied to survey the image quality of 54 mammography machines from 17 hospitals. Participants sent us phantom images to be evaluated for each mammography machine at their hospital. Each phantom was loaned to us for obtaining images of the wax insert plate on a reference machine at our institution. The images were digitized and analyzed to yield indices that quantified the image quality of the machines precisely. We have developed methods for normalizing for the variation of the individual speck sizes between different ACR phantoms, for the variation of the speck sizes within a microcalcification group, and for variations in overall speeds of the mammography systems. In terms of the microcalcification SNR, the variability of the x-ray machines was 40.5% when no allowance was made for phantom or mAs variations. This dropped to 17.1% when phantom variability was accounted for, and to 12.7% when mAs variability was also allowed for. Our work shows the feasibility of practical, low-cost, objective and accurate evaluations, as a useful adjunct to the present ACR method.
© (1996) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Dev Prasad Chakraborty, "Physical measures of image quality in mammography", Proc. SPIE 2708, Medical Imaging 1996: Physics of Medical Imaging, (11 April 1996); doi: 10.1117/12.237781; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.237781
PROCEEDINGS
15 PAGES


SHARE
KEYWORDS
Signal to noise ratio

Mammography

Image quality

Image analysis

X-rays

Image processing

Quality measurement

Back to Top