Contrast-detail analysis of the effect of image compression on computed tomographic images

Larry T. Cook; Glendon G. Cox; Michael F. Insana; Michael A. McFadden; Timothy J. Hall; Roger S. Gaborski; Fleming Yuan Ming Lure

doi:10.1117/12.236849

27 March 1996 Contrast-detail analysis of the effect of image compression on computed tomographic images

Larry T. Cook, Glendon G. Cox, Michael F. Insana, Michael A. McFadden, Timothy J. Hall, Roger S. Gaborski, Fleming Yuan Ming Lure

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 2712, Medical Imaging 1996: Image Perception; (1996) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.236849
Event: Medical Imaging 1996, 1996, Newport Beach, CA, United States

Abstract

Three compression algorithms were compared by using contrast-detail (CD) analysis. Two phantoms were designed to simulate computed tomography (CT) scans of the head. The first was based on CT scans of a plastic cylinder containing water. The second was formed by combining a CT scan of a head with a scan of the water phantom. The soft tissue of the brainwas replaced by a subimage containing only water. The compression algorithms studied were the full-frame discrete cosine (FDCT) algorithm, the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) algorithm, and a wavelet algorithm. Both the wavelet and JPEG algorithms affected regions of the image near the boundary of the skull. The FDCT algorithm propagated false edges throughout the region interior to the skull. The wavelet algorithm affected the images less than the other compression algorithms. The presence of the skull especially affected observer performance on the FDCT compressed images. All of the findings demonstrated a flattening of the CD curve for large lesions. The results of a compression study using lossy compression algorithms is dependent on the characteristics ofthe image and the nature of the diagnostic task. Because of the high density bone of the skull, head CT images present a much more difficult compression problem than chest x-rays. We found no significant differences among the CD curves for the tested compression algorithms. Key Words: Image compression, contrast-detail analysis.

Citation Download Citation

Larry T. Cook, Larry T. Cook, Glendon G. Cox, Glendon G. Cox, Michael F. Insana, Michael F. Insana, Michael A. McFadden, Michael A. McFadden, Timothy J. Hall, Timothy J. Hall, Roger S. Gaborski, Roger S. Gaborski, Fleming Yuan Ming Lure, Fleming Yuan Ming Lure, } "Contrast-detail analysis of the effect of image compression on computed tomographic images", Proc. SPIE 2712, Medical Imaging 1996: Image Perception, (27 March 1996); doi: 10.1117/12.236849; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.236849

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

PERSONAL SIGN IN
Full access may be available with your subscription

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Remember Email/Username on this computer

Remember Password

No SPIE account? Create an account
or Institutional Sign In via Shibboleth

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $14.40

Non-members: $18.00 ADD TO CART

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years