13 September 1996 Use of elevated source/drain structure in sub-0.1 um NMOSFETs
Author Affiliations +
As MOSFET feature sizes are scaled down to 0.1 micrometers and below, new techniques are required to develop and fabricate shallow, low contact resistance, and low leakage S/D junctions. In this study, 2D device simulations have been performed to compare conventional drain/source extension and elevated source/drain structure approaches for sub-0.1 micrometers MOSFETs. With a relatively deep n+ junction (approximately 0.1 micrometers ) in the D/S extension structure, the sidewall spacer needs to be wide enough such that the n+ front is away from the gate edge in order not to contribute significantly to short-channel effects due to additional charge sharing and drain-induced-barrier-lowering (DIBL). However this requires increased device layout area and results in increased parasitic resistance due to the long and shallow D/S extensions. Elevated S/D structures offer an alternative solution by providing a sacrificial layer for silicidation and a shallow n+ junction in the substrate to minimize the impact of n+ junctions on short-channel effects in sub-0.1 micrometers devices. The use of elevated S/D structure allows scaling down of the spacer width and relaxing the subsurface doping requirement to achieve a specified DIBL level. These lead to a significant increase in the drive current and a reduction in the junction capacitance. The gate-to-S/D capacitance associated with elevated S/D MOSFET can be controlled by proper scaling of the elevated layer thickness along with other pertinent design parameters.
© (1996) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Jay J. Sun, Jay J. Sun, Jiunn-Yann Tsai, Jiunn-Yann Tsai, Kam F. Yee, Kam F. Yee, Carlton M. Osburn, Carlton M. Osburn, } "Use of elevated source/drain structure in sub-0.1 um NMOSFETs", Proc. SPIE 2875, Microelectronic Device and Multilevel Interconnection Technology II, (13 September 1996); doi: 10.1117/12.250863; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.250863

Back to Top