Impact-echo and impulse response stress-wave methods: advantages and limitations for the evaluation of highway pavement concrete overlays

Allen G. Davis; Bernhard H. Hertlein; Malcolm K. Lim; Kevin Michols

doi:10.1117/12.259127

13 November 1996 Impact-echo and impulse response stress-wave methods: advantages and limitations for the evaluation of highway pavement concrete overlays

Allen G. Davis, Bernhard H. Hertlein, Malcolm K. Lim, Kevin Michols

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 2946, Nondestructive Evaluation of Bridges and Highways; (1996) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.259127
Event: Nondestructive Evaluation Techniques for Aging Infrastructure and Manufacturing, 1996, Scottsdale, AZ, United States

Abstract

Concrete overlays with thickness ranging between 25 mm and 300 mm are frequently used to restore and strengthen existing concrete pavements and bridge approach slabs. Differences in the strengths and elastic moduli of the overlay and the substrate, as well as the cleanliness and roughness of the interface between the two layers affect the medium and long term performance of these structures. Debonding at the interface, excessive tensile stresses at the base of the overlay and delamination within the upper layer are commonly occurring problems. If these defects are not detected and corrected in god time, the deterioration of the overlay under the action of heavy axle loads is rapid and becomes expensive to fix. Nondestructive methods are required to identify the budding problems of the type described above, by surveying overlay systems quickly and economically. Stress wave methods for flaw detection in concrete structures and foundations have shown great promise in recent years. The Impact-Echo test has been applied successfully to many diverse concrete material problems. The Impulse Response test is proven in the detection of flaws in deep concrete foundations, as well as the location of poor support conditions beneath and delaminations within concrete slabs on grade. This paper presents a case study where both methods were used to examine a stepped concrete overlay on approach slabs to bridge decks on a heavily trafficked interstate highway. The two test methods are briefly described, and a comparison is drawn emphasizing the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques.

Citation Download Citation

Allen G. Davis, Bernhard H. Hertlein, Malcolm K. Lim, and Kevin Michols "Impact-echo and impulse response stress-wave methods: advantages and limitations for the evaluation of highway pavement concrete overlays", Proc. SPIE 2946, Nondestructive Evaluation of Bridges and Highways, (13 November 1996); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.259127

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available