23 June 1997 Aided versus automatic target recognition
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 3069, Automatic Target Recognition VII; (1997); doi: 10.1117/12.277120
Event: AeroSense '97, 1997, Orlando, FL, United States
Abstract
Automatic target recognition (ATR) algorithms have offered the promise of recognizing items of military importance over the past 20 years. It is the experience of the authors that greater ATR success would be possible if the ATR were used to 'aid' the human operator instead of automatically 'direct' the operator. ATRs have failed not due to their probability of detection versus false alarm rate, but to neglect of the human component. ATRs are designed to improve overall throughput by relieving the human operator of the need to perform repetitive tasks like scanning vast quantities of imagery for possible targets. ATRs are typically inserted prior to the operator and provide cues, which are then accepted or rejected. From our experience at three field exercises and a current operational deployment to the Bosnian theater, this is not the best way to get total system performance. The human operator makes decisions based on learning, history of past events, and surrounding contextual information. Loss of these factors by providing imagery, latent with symbolic cues on top of the original imagery, actually increases the workload of the operator. This paper covers the lessons learned from the field demonstrations and the operational deployment. The reconnaissance and intelligence community's primary use of an ATR should be to establish prioritized cues of potential targets for an operator to 'pull' from and to be able to 'send' targets identified by the operator for a 'second opinion.' The Army and Air Force are modifying their exploitation workstations over the next 18 months to use ATRs, which operate in this fashion. This will be the future architecture that ATRs for the reconnaissance and intelligence community should integrate into.
© (1997) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Mark A. O'Hair, Bradley D. Purvis, Jeff Brown, "Aided versus automatic target recognition", Proc. SPIE 3069, Automatic Target Recognition VII, (23 June 1997); doi: 10.1117/12.277120; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.277120
PROCEEDINGS
10 PAGES


SHARE
KEYWORDS
Automatic target recognition

Target detection

Reconnaissance

Gold

Image segmentation

Optical resolution

Sensors

RELATED CONTENT

Photothermal multi-pixel imaging microscope
Proceedings of SPIE (June 10 2004)
VisNAV 100 a robust, compact imaging sensor for enabling...
Proceedings of SPIE (January 28 2010)
Modeling GPR data from lidar soil surface profile
Proceedings of SPIE (May 10 2012)
Overview of Japanese Earth observation programs
Proceedings of SPIE (October 13 2017)

Back to Top