Paper
16 April 1973 Precise Signal And Noise Measurements Of Video Waveforms
H. D. Fisher
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 0032, Developments in Electronic Imaging Techniques II; (1973) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.953593
Event: Developments in Electronic Imaging Techniques, 1972, San Mateo, United States
Abstract
Present methods being used for the evaluation of the peak-to-peak signal and RMS noise are perhaps satisfactory at high signal-to-noise levels, but at low signal-to-noise levels, where many low light level tubes operate, these methods are inadequate. Even at large light levels, signals which can ultimately be detected by the human eye (which integrates for periods of up to 1/5 second) will be buried in the noise of the video waveform (which is usually determined by the large bandwidth of about 10 MHz in the video channel). Any routine image tube measurement, such as spectral response or spatial resolution, will therefore need an averaging technique of one kind or another to eliminate the video noise and permit an accurate measurement over the entire useful range of signal levels. In addition, certain applications also require a knowledge of the noise itself. For instance, the amplitude distribution of the noise is very important in determining the "false alarm rate" of a system designed to detect a specific target. At the limiting resolution of the system, a large noise pulse would be indistinguishable from the target itself. That noise pulse would be a "false alarm". The false alarm rate of a system can only be predicted if the amplitude distribution of the noise is known. In the analysis of photoelectronic imaging devices, the present methods for measuring signal and noise (Ref. 1) include those where a time exposure of an oscilloscope trace is taken, allowing the film to average out the noise. The width of the "grass" displayed (assumed to indicate the ± 3a value of a Gaussian distribution) is divided by six and used as an estimate of the RMS noise value. Peak-to-peak signal is determined by measuring the positive extremes of the noise envelope. An improvement on this, while still subjective in nature, involves using a split screen presentation on the oscilloscope with the unknown signal on one side and a known RMS value on the other. By varying the known waveform amplitude until a match between the two sections is achieved, and then reading the value from the known source, the RMS value can be determined.
© (1973) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
H. D. Fisher "Precise Signal And Noise Measurements Of Video Waveforms", Proc. SPIE 0032, Developments in Electronic Imaging Techniques II, (16 April 1973); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.953593
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Interference (communication)

Oscilloscopes

Video

Signal to noise ratio

Error analysis

Target detection

Electronics

RELATED CONTENT

A simple baseline for signal detection and extraction
Proceedings of SPIE (October 11 2023)
Efficient display of high-dynamic-range imagery
Proceedings of SPIE (September 08 1995)
Detection of constrained signals
Proceedings of SPIE (August 20 2001)

Back to Top