7 June 2000 How detrimental is eye movement during photorefractive keratectomy to the patient's postoperative vision?
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 3908, Ophthalmic Technologies X; (2000) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.387520
Event: BiOS 2000 The International Symposium on Biomedical Optics, 2000, San Jose, CA, United States
This study aimed to gauge the effect of the patient's eye movement during Photo Refractive Keratectomy (PRK) on post- operative vision. A computer simulation of both the PRK procedure and the visual outcome has been performed. The PRK simulation incorporated the pattern of movement of the laser beam to perform a given correction, the beam characteristics, an initial corneal profile, and an eye movement scenario; and generated the corrected corneal profile. The regrowth of the epithelium was simulated by selecting the smoothing filter which, when applied to a corrected cornea with no patient eye movement, produced similar ray tracing results to the original corneal model. Ray tracing several objects, such as letters of various contrast and sizes was performed to assess the quality of the post-operative vision. Eye movement scenarios included no eye movement, constant decentration and normally distributed random eye movement of varying magnitudes. Random eye movement of even small amounts, such as 50 microns reduces the contrast sensitivity of the image. Constant decentration decenters the projected image on the retina, and in extreme cases can lead to astigmatism. Eye movements of the magnitude expected during laser refractive surgery have minimal effect on the final visual outcome.
© (2000) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Natalie M. Taylor, Natalie M. Taylor, Paul P. van Saarloos, Paul P. van Saarloos, Robert H. Eikelboom, Robert H. Eikelboom, } "How detrimental is eye movement during photorefractive keratectomy to the patient's postoperative vision?", Proc. SPIE 3908, Ophthalmic Technologies X, (7 June 2000); doi: 10.1117/12.387520; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.387520


Back to Top