Translator Disclaimer
5 July 2000 Comparison between 2-phase-shifting mask and 3-phase-shifting mask on application of printing low-duty-ratio contact array patterning
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
In this study, 2PSM and 3PSM are implemented to print low- duty-ratio self-aligned contact plugs. The simulation and experimental results demonstrate that 2PSM has larger process windows than 3PSM. One of the advantages of 2PSM is no asymmetric defocus effect, which is caused by the phase difference of 3PSM and reduces the process window of 3PSM. Defocus-dependent shape distortion in the case of 3PSM is not found in the case of 2PSM, either. Different illumination conditions have been investigated to determine the best illumination condition for 2PSM in terms of large common process window besides less x-y distortion. Optimum illumination parameters and suitable scattering bars can minimize pattern distortion.
© (2000) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Kuei-Chun Hung, Benjamin Szu-Min Lin, Hsien-an Chang, Alex Tseng, Lien-Sheng Chung, WeiJyh Liu, Der-Yuan Wu, and Peter Huang "Comparison between 2-phase-shifting mask and 3-phase-shifting mask on application of printing low-duty-ratio contact array patterning", Proc. SPIE 4000, Optical Microlithography XIII, (5 July 2000); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.388974
PROCEEDINGS
8 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
RELATED CONTENT

Comparison of single and dual exposure phase shift mask...
Proceedings of SPIE (December 18 1998)
Advances in vortex via fabrication
Proceedings of SPIE (May 28 2004)
Design methodology for dark-field phase-shifted masks
Proceedings of SPIE (July 01 1991)
Hard phase shifting masks for the 65 nm node ...
Proceedings of SPIE (May 28 2004)

Back to Top