Paper
5 July 2000 Impact of MEEF on low k1 lithography and mask inspection
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
In this paper, we present a comparative simulation study of mask defect impact in a high MEEF process and its detectability under a mask inspection too. A simulation mode for a mask inspection system is constructed and validated by comparing the simulated signal with data collected from an inspection tool. With this calibrated mode, defect images and scan signals from programmed defect pattens are studied. The corresponding wafer CD variations caused by programmed defects are simulated using a photolithography simulator. We find that for a mask defect of a given size, its impact on wafer varies greatly from location to location, depending on the MEEF of the host patterns surrounding the defect. In comparison, the signal from a high-resolution inspection tool varies linearly with defect size and is nearly independent of the host patterns. Once the MEEF starts its sharp increase, the sensitivity of the inspection tool is required to increase at the same rate. An inspection tool operating at its resolution limit generally could not follow the sharp increase in MEEF once the wafer process starts to degrade. It is therefore important to control the MEEF in the original pattern design to ensure that residual defect does not cause circuit malfunction. Extra margins may have to be introduced in the design rule to account for the impact of residual defects.
© (2000) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Qi-De Qian "Impact of MEEF on low k1 lithography and mask inspection", Proc. SPIE 4000, Optical Microlithography XIII, (5 July 2000); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.389048
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

Inspection

Semiconducting wafers

Critical dimension metrology

Optical lithography

Databases

Lithography

Back to Top