Remote optical measurement techniques: underperformance or overexpectation?

Andrew Crookell; Richard A. Brook

doi:10.1117/12.417371

14 February 2001 Remote optical measurement techniques: underperformance or overexpectation?

Andrew Crookell, Richard A. Brook

Proceedings Volume 4199, Water, Ground, and Air Pollution Monitoring and Remediation; (2001) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.417371
Event: Environmental and Industrial Sensing, 2000, Boston, MA, United States

Abstract

12 According to users of remote optical instruments for measuring process emissions or air quality, they don't work well enough to justify their use for demonstrating compliance with statutory limits. According to instrument manufacturers, the users don't appreciate their instruments or the performance capabilities and are certainly not prepared to pay enough for the kind of validation they are demanding. One thing is clear; everyone wants proven performance. In this paper we examine the determination of critical performance factors for remote optical measurement techniques within the context of future European standardization legislation.

Citation Download Citation

Andrew Crookell and Richard A. Brook "Remote optical measurement techniques: underperformance or overexpectation?", Proc. SPIE 4199, Water, Ground, and Air Pollution Monitoring and Remediation, (14 February 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.417371

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available