14 February 2001 Remote optical measurement techniques: underperformance or overexpectation?
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 4199, Water, Ground, and Air Pollution Monitoring and Remediation; (2001) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.417371
Event: Environmental and Industrial Sensing, 2000, Boston, MA, United States
12 According to users of remote optical instruments for measuring process emissions or air quality, they don't work well enough to justify their use for demonstrating compliance with statutory limits. According to instrument manufacturers, the users don't appreciate their instruments or the performance capabilities and are certainly not prepared to pay enough for the kind of validation they are demanding. One thing is clear; everyone wants proven performance. In this paper we examine the determination of critical performance factors for remote optical measurement techniques within the context of future European standardization legislation.
© (2001) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Andrew Crookell, Andrew Crookell, Richard A. Brook, Richard A. Brook, "Remote optical measurement techniques: underperformance or overexpectation?", Proc. SPIE 4199, Water, Ground, and Air Pollution Monitoring and Remediation, (14 February 2001); doi: 10.1117/12.417371; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.417371


New infrared sources for breath analysis
Proceedings of SPIE (February 26 2006)
Remote sensing of motor vehicle exhaust emissions the road...
Proceedings of SPIE (February 25 2001)
A commercial tunable diode laser (TDL) system for on line...
Proceedings of SPIE (November 03 2004)

Back to Top