You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
28 June 2001Comparison of a-Si:H/CsI flat-panel digital imaging systems with CR-and CCD-based systems: image quality measurements
The amorphous silicon/cesium iodide (a-Si:H/CsI:Tl) flat-panel imaging systems have recently become commercially available for both chest and mammographic imaging applications. This new detector technology is considered to be a significant improvement over CR techniques. In this work, we measured the image properties for two commercial flat-panel systems and compared them with those measured for CR and CCD based imaging systems. Image quality measurements related to detector properties such as linearity, MTF, NPS and DQE are presented and compared at selected chest and mammographic imaging techniques. Factors and issues related to these measurements are discussed. For chest imaging, the flat-panel system was found to have slightly lower MTFs but significantly higher DQEs than the CR system. For mammographic imaging, the CCD-based system was found to have the highest MTF, followed in order by the flat-panel and CR systems. The flat-panel system was found to have the highest DQEs, followed in the order by the CCD-based and CR systems. The DQEs of the flat-panel systems were found to increase with exposure while those of the CR systems decrease slightly with the exposure in both chest and mammographic imaging. The DQEs of the CCD-based system were found to vary little for exposures ranging from 1 to 30 mR.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Xinming Liu, Chris C. Shaw, Xiujiang Rong, Michael R. Lemacks, "Comparison of a-Si:H/Csl flat-panel digital imaging systems with CR-and CCD-based systems: image quality measurements," Proc. SPIE 4320, Medical Imaging 2001: Physics of Medical Imaging, (28 June 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.430951