7 August 2001 Workflow comparison of DR- and screen-film-dedicated chest systems
Author Affiliations +
In a medical center performing an average of 50 upright chest examinations per day, a digital radiography dedicated chest device (General Electric) was compared to a conventional screen-film dedicated chest unit (Picker), in terms of workflow, technologist productivity, and overall speed-of-service from examination ordering to interpretation available. An assessment of ease-of-use and workflow of each device was collected via a technologist opinion survey. Productivity was measured as the rate of patient throughput from normalized timing studies. Measurements were made throughout a typical workday and workweek covering periods of constant as well as spurious activity.
© (2001) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Katherine P. Andriole, Katherine P. Andriole, David M. Luth, David M. Luth, Robert G. Gould, Robert G. Gould, } "Workflow comparison of DR- and screen-film-dedicated chest systems", Proc. SPIE 4323, Medical Imaging 2001: PACS and Integrated Medical Information Systems: Design and Evaluation, (7 August 2001); doi: 10.1117/12.435477; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.435477

Back to Top