Mask error factor: critical dimension variation across different tools, features, and exposure conditions

Igor Jekauc; William R. Roberts; Christine Hampe

doi:10.1117/12.435784

14 September 2001 Mask error factor: critical dimension variation across different tools, features, and exposure conditions

Igor Jekauc, William R. Roberts, Christine Hampe

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 4346, Optical Microlithography XIV; (2001) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.435784
Event: 26th Annual International Symposium on Microlithography, 2001, Santa Clara, CA, United States

Abstract

Mask Error Enhancement Factor (MEEF) or commonly Mask Error Factor (MEF) has recently become an important metric in determining process requirements in the SIA roadmap. MEF, in general, varies inversely with CD and is often significantly above unity indicating that mask CD errors are in effect magnified during the optical transfer to the wafer. Until recently, the SIA roadmap indicated mask makers needed to allow in the reticle budget for a 1.5X MEF allocation. Discussion at recent industry workshops has indicated that this allocation may be underestimated. We have generated experimental results for vertical, horizontal, dense, and isolated lines as well as contact holes for feature sizes in the range of 150 - 250nm. MEF dependence on the lens, and its variation will be compared across several scanning exposure systems. Role of Numerical Aperture (NA) and role of different illumination settings including conventional, annular, and quadrupole will be measured and compared to the simple theoretical expectations. Finally, MEF will be studied across lens location and correlated to the aberrations. A significant difference in mask error factor between horizontal and vertical lines will also be described in terms of feature size and lens aberrations.

Citation Download Citation

Igor Jekauc, William R. Roberts, and Christine Hampe "Mask error factor: critical dimension variation across different tools, features, and exposure conditions", Proc. SPIE 4346, Optical Microlithography XIV, (14 September 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.435784

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available